Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Deux lettres de Vjačeslav Ivanov
View through CrossRef
Two Letters of Vjačeslav Ivanov
After years of reflexion Vjačeslav Ivanov decided, in 1926, to join the Catholic Church. Не informed the Vatican Congregation for the Eastern Church about his wish and asked to be authorized to use for this occasion a statement written by Vladimir Solov'ev instead of the usual formula, according to which the postulant «abjured» the Orthodox Church. Ivanov did not abjure. Не believed on the contrary that by professing the unity of the Universal Church one acts as a real member of Orthodoxy as it was before the quarrels and schisms.
The Congregation, after consulting the Holy Office, agreed to the unusual proceeding.
A year later, the 15 years old son of Ivanov, Dimitri, wrote to his father — then in Pavia — informing him about his intention to become a catholic. To his great surprise his father strongly objected and insisted that Dimitri go to the Russian Orthodox church, discuss the mater with the Rector, confess and, if the Rector allowed, receive Communion. Не should first become a good orhodox, before deciding.
Dimitri obeyed. But a few months later he became dangerously ill. Не then returned to his previous decision and this time his father agreed. Не only regretted that in the hospital chapel it was not possible to celebrate the liturgy in the bizantine rite. As he later wrote to his friend, S. L. Frank, «the Catholic Church consists of two halves: the Latin Church and the Greek Church. The latter is not as numerous but essential on a spiritual level because preceding the course of history it accomplishes the wholeness of the Universal Church».
Title: Deux lettres de Vjačeslav Ivanov
Description:
Two Letters of Vjačeslav Ivanov
After years of reflexion Vjačeslav Ivanov decided, in 1926, to join the Catholic Church.
Не informed the Vatican Congregation for the Eastern Church about his wish and asked to be authorized to use for this occasion a statement written by Vladimir Solov'ev instead of the usual formula, according to which the postulant «abjured» the Orthodox Church.
Ivanov did not abjure.
Не believed on the contrary that by professing the unity of the Universal Church one acts as a real member of Orthodoxy as it was before the quarrels and schisms.
The Congregation, after consulting the Holy Office, agreed to the unusual proceeding.
A year later, the 15 years old son of Ivanov, Dimitri, wrote to his father — then in Pavia — informing him about his intention to become a catholic.
To his great surprise his father strongly objected and insisted that Dimitri go to the Russian Orthodox church, discuss the mater with the Rector, confess and, if the Rector allowed, receive Communion.
Не should first become a good orhodox, before deciding.
Dimitri obeyed.
But a few months later he became dangerously ill.
Не then returned to his previous decision and this time his father agreed.
Не only regretted that in the hospital chapel it was not possible to celebrate the liturgy in the bizantine rite.
As he later wrote to his friend, S.
L.
Frank, «the Catholic Church consists of two halves: the Latin Church and the Greek Church.
The latter is not as numerous but essential on a spiritual level because preceding the course of history it accomplishes the wholeness of the Universal Church».
Related Results
“Mysteries of the Linguistic Sphinx”: Vyacheslav Ivanov and Mikhail Bakhtin in Ludmila A. Gogotishvili’s interpretation
“Mysteries of the Linguistic Sphinx”: Vyacheslav Ivanov and Mikhail Bakhtin in Ludmila A. Gogotishvili’s interpretation
The article examines the linguistic interpretation of the problem of the influence of Vyach. Ivanov symbolism on the dialogical concept of Mikhail Bakhtin, first undertaken by Lyud...
Vjačeslav Ivanov et Vladimir Solov'ev
Vjačeslav Ivanov et Vladimir Solov'ev
Michel GRABAR, Vjačeslav Ivanov et Vladimir Solov'ev.
Philosophe et poète, Vladimir Solov'ev a eu une influence déterminante sur la constitution de la « nouvelle conscience re...
The Nietzschean stratum in Vyacheslav Ivanov’s tragedy Prometheus
The Nietzschean stratum in Vyacheslav Ivanov’s tragedy Prometheus
Vyacheslav Ivanov’s tragedy Prometheus is full of subtexts, including Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy, which was first identified by Valery Bryusov in his review of the tragedy. T...
La correspondance de Voltaire avec Étienne–Noël Damilaville
La correspondance de Voltaire avec Étienne–Noël Damilaville
La présente thèse porte sur la correspondance de Voltaire avec Étienne- Noël Damilaville qui dure huit ans (1760- 1768). Le corpus est composé des lettres qui nous sont parvenues ;...
Édition critique des lettres de Juliette Drouet à Victor Hugo de 1874-1875
Édition critique des lettres de Juliette Drouet à Victor Hugo de 1874-1875
Pendant cinquante ans, de 1833 à 1883, Juliette Drouet écrivit environ vingt-deux mille lettres à Victor Hugo. Le corpus étudié, composé de 653 lettres plus une enveloppe, propose ...
A historical analysis of the differences between Ashkenazic scribal styles, namely, the Arizal and the Beth Yosef
A historical analysis of the differences between Ashkenazic scribal styles, namely, the Arizal and the Beth Yosef
Une analyse historique des différences entre les styles scribales ashkénazes, à savoir l'Arizal et le Beth Yosef
Sofrei STaM (Torah scribes) modernes utilisent fond...
The Evolution of Erasmus’ Epistolary Style
The Evolution of Erasmus’ Epistolary Style
L'évolution du style épistolaire d'Érasme
Il existe de nombreuses preuves qu'Érasme a soigneusement planifié la publication de différents recueils de ses lettres. Pour d'autr...
The Russian Symbolist Viacheslav Ivanov on Aesthetic Experience as Religious
The Russian Symbolist Viacheslav Ivanov on Aesthetic Experience as Religious
Viacheslav Ivanov (1866, Moscow–1949, Rome) is one of the most prominent Russian symbolist poets and a leading theorist of symbolism at the beginning of the twentieth century. The ...

