Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

History of Archaeological Research in Afghan Sistan

View through CrossRef
This chapter traces the historical and archaeological study of Afghan Sistan from the time of European travelers in the 19th century to the present. Numerous English and other European visitors to Sistan in the 19th century wrote journals of their travels. The border location of Sistan meant that the various Afghan boundary commissions of the 1880s and subsequent decades spent much time in the area, including surveyor G.P. Tate, who wrote the first extensive research volume on Sistan in 1910. Archaeological work was slow in coming: a brief French mission and excavation in the 1930s, American Walter Fairservis’s survey in 1949-50, and work by British archaeologist Norman Hammond, German scholar Klaus Fischer, and American George Dales in the 1950s and 1960s. The only archaeologist to visit Sistan after the Helmand Sistan Project was Mark Abramiuk, working with the US military in 2010-2011. Much more extensive work has taken place in Iranian Sistan by Italian and Iranian teams, though with different emphases and results than in Afghan Sistan.
Title: History of Archaeological Research in Afghan Sistan
Description:
This chapter traces the historical and archaeological study of Afghan Sistan from the time of European travelers in the 19th century to the present.
Numerous English and other European visitors to Sistan in the 19th century wrote journals of their travels.
The border location of Sistan meant that the various Afghan boundary commissions of the 1880s and subsequent decades spent much time in the area, including surveyor G.
P.
Tate, who wrote the first extensive research volume on Sistan in 1910.
Archaeological work was slow in coming: a brief French mission and excavation in the 1930s, American Walter Fairservis’s survey in 1949-50, and work by British archaeologist Norman Hammond, German scholar Klaus Fischer, and American George Dales in the 1950s and 1960s.
The only archaeologist to visit Sistan after the Helmand Sistan Project was Mark Abramiuk, working with the US military in 2010-2011.
Much more extensive work has taken place in Iranian Sistan by Italian and Iranian teams, though with different emphases and results than in Afghan Sistan.

Related Results

Afghan internationalism and the question of Afghanistan's political legitimacy
Afghan internationalism and the question of Afghanistan's political legitimacy
This article uses Afghan engagement with twentieth-century international politics to reflect on the fluctuating nature of Afghan statehood and citizenship, with a particular focus ...
Critical Analyses of Pak-Afghan Transit Trade Agreement: Pakistan’s Perspective
Critical Analyses of Pak-Afghan Transit Trade Agreement: Pakistan’s Perspective
Asia’s Cockpit, Afghanistan, is not only a strategic neigbour but also share intellectual, geographical, cultural, and diplomatic relations with Pakistan. Pakistan and Afghanistan’...
Phytolith extraction and counting procedure for modern plant material rich in silica skeletons v1
Phytolith extraction and counting procedure for modern plant material rich in silica skeletons v1
Modern plant tissues are often processed for phytolith analysis. They represent a fundamental source of comparison for archeological and palaeoenvironmental phytolith assemblages; ...
Phytolith extraction and counting procedure for modern plant material rich in silica skeletons v2
Phytolith extraction and counting procedure for modern plant material rich in silica skeletons v2
Modern plant tissues are often processed for phytolith analysis. They represent a fundamental source of comparison for archeological and palaeoenvironmental phytolith assemblages; ...
Phytolith extraction and counting procedure for modern plant material rich in silica skeletons v1
Phytolith extraction and counting procedure for modern plant material rich in silica skeletons v1
Modern plant tissues are often processed for phytolith analysis. They represent a fundamental source of comparison for archeological and palaeoenvironmental phytolith assemblages; ...

Back to Top