Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Ethicality of Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccinations in Uganda: A Qualitative Study
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
COVID-19 spread globally and caused greater than 3.9 million deaths worldwide. Approximately 2.8 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered worldwide. Some studies have suggested that vaccination is the most effective strategy for mitigating COVID-19. However, due to vaccine hesitancy, many people end up shunning vaccinations. The parliamentary committee on health in Uganda proposed making coronavirus vaccinations mandatory and as a result, the Public Health Act was amended in 2022 making vaccinations of immunizable diseases mandatory. There has not been a scientific study to explore the views of healthcare workers, bioethicists, and the general public on the ethicality of mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations in Uganda.
Methods
This was a cross-section sectional study that employed in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. The study was conducted in Mulago National Referral Hospital, Makerere University, College of Health Sciences, Wandegeya, and Mulago areas. Fifteen participants were purposively selected based on their expertise for in-depth interviews and four groups of twenty-four members for focus group discussions. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed. The coding was both deductive and inductive. NVivo software 12 was used to support data analysis and illustrative quotes were extracted.
Results
The participants shared their perspective on the ethicality surrounding mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations. Opinions were divided: 21 participants supported the mandates, 5 expressed reservations, and 13 opposed them. Supporters argued that requiring vaccination helped reduce infection rates and that the overall benefits outweighed any potential risks. Those with reservations felt that, while mandates were necessary in principle, there were significant practical concerns, controversies, and shortcomings in their implementation. Opponents contended that such mandates infringed upon their personal autonomy.
Conclusion
This inquiry into the ethicality of mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations raised mixed views among the stakeholders, and implementors of vaccination programs should have put this in mind.
Clinical Trial number:
Not Applicable
Title: The Ethicality of Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccinations in Uganda: A Qualitative Study
Description:
Abstract
Background
COVID-19 spread globally and caused greater than 3.
9 million deaths worldwide.
Approximately 2.
8 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered worldwide.
Some studies have suggested that vaccination is the most effective strategy for mitigating COVID-19.
However, due to vaccine hesitancy, many people end up shunning vaccinations.
The parliamentary committee on health in Uganda proposed making coronavirus vaccinations mandatory and as a result, the Public Health Act was amended in 2022 making vaccinations of immunizable diseases mandatory.
There has not been a scientific study to explore the views of healthcare workers, bioethicists, and the general public on the ethicality of mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations in Uganda.
Methods
This was a cross-section sectional study that employed in-depth interviews and focus group discussions.
The study was conducted in Mulago National Referral Hospital, Makerere University, College of Health Sciences, Wandegeya, and Mulago areas.
Fifteen participants were purposively selected based on their expertise for in-depth interviews and four groups of twenty-four members for focus group discussions.
Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed.
The coding was both deductive and inductive.
NVivo software 12 was used to support data analysis and illustrative quotes were extracted.
Results
The participants shared their perspective on the ethicality surrounding mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations.
Opinions were divided: 21 participants supported the mandates, 5 expressed reservations, and 13 opposed them.
Supporters argued that requiring vaccination helped reduce infection rates and that the overall benefits outweighed any potential risks.
Those with reservations felt that, while mandates were necessary in principle, there were significant practical concerns, controversies, and shortcomings in their implementation.
Opponents contended that such mandates infringed upon their personal autonomy.
Conclusion
This inquiry into the ethicality of mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations raised mixed views among the stakeholders, and implementors of vaccination programs should have put this in mind.
Clinical Trial number:
Not Applicable.
Related Results
Evaluation of female university students’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward human papillomavirus infection and vaccination. Multicenter cross-sectional study
Evaluation of female university students’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward human papillomavirus infection and vaccination. Multicenter cross-sectional study
Abstract
Introduction
Having good knowledge and a favorable attitude toward human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV vaccinations is the cornerstone for i...
An ontology-based approach to engineering ethicality requirements
An ontology-based approach to engineering ethicality requirements
AbstractIn a world where Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pervasive, humans may feel threatened or at risk by giving up control to machines. In this context, ethicality becomes a ma...
Delivering Adolescent Vaccinations in the Medical Home: A New Era?
Delivering Adolescent Vaccinations in the Medical Home: A New Era?
BACKGROUND. Medical homes are health care settings that offer continuous, comprehensive, accessible primary care; these settings generally involve pediatric and family physician pr...
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) surface glycoproteins, including shared epitope motifs, sho...
COVID-19 scenarios for comparing the effectiveness of age-specific vaccination regimes, exemplified for the city of Aschaffenburg (Germany)
COVID-19 scenarios for comparing the effectiveness of age-specific vaccination regimes, exemplified for the city of Aschaffenburg (Germany)
AbstractPurpose of this reportThe purpose of this rapid communication is to illustrate the effectiveness of different vaccination regimes for controlling the number of severe and c...
The Uganda’s perspective, status and implementation of the National leather value chain Strategies
The Uganda’s perspective, status and implementation of the National leather value chain Strategies
Uganda is transforming her leather value chain to a modern and competitive sub-sector, aiming at production of value-added leather materials and leather products from the abundant ...
PERSEPSI IBU HAMIL TENTANG VAKSIN COVID-19 TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN VAKSINASI COVID-19
PERSEPSI IBU HAMIL TENTANG VAKSIN COVID-19 TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN VAKSINASI COVID-19
Latar Belakang: kasus positif Covid-19 di Kabupaten Sukoharjo tahun 2021 mencapai 12.350 dan terus mengalami penambahan jumlah. Dari jumlah tersebut terdapat 168 kasus positif Covi...

