Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Birth after Caesarean Section: A Retrospective Audit of 10 Years of State-Wide Data
View through CrossRef
Rates of Caesarean Section (CS) have been increasing worldwide with varying rates of [5] percent in Sub-Saharan Africa to 43 percent in Latin America and the Caribbean [1]. In Australia too rates have increased from 32 percent in 2011 to 38 percent in 20212. Attempts have been made to seek ways at slowing the rise in rates of CS but with little success [3]. Women who have had a previous CS may elect to have a Elective Repeat CS (ERCS) or have an attempt at a Vaginal Birth (VBAC) in their subsequent pregnancy. A planned VBAC, considering the woman’s individual history and needs, is viewed as a safe option for many women with a single previous lower segment caesarean section [4]. Studies have shown that a Trial of Labour (TOL) ending in a VBAC is most favourable for the mother, newborn, and the health service [5,6]. Likelihood of success rates are reported to be between 60 and 80 percent [7]. A recent meta-analysis [8] noted successful vaginal birth rates of 74.3 percent if labour was spontaneous and 60.7 percent if induced. Achieving successful VBAC has also been reported to be less expensive and more effective than undergoing an ERCS [9,10]. There has recently been an international multi-centre trial that aims to increase the proportion of women having VBAC by increasing woman-centred care and facilitating women’s empowerment in their choice of birth in three countries – Germany, Ireland and Italy [1]. An attempt at vaginal birth is also supported by various colleges across countries [4,7,12]. One of the reasons for the preference of ERCS may be a concern of a failed trial at vaginal birth resulting in an emergency CS. In one study of 29 352 women who attempted a vaginal birth after CS compared to 169 377 women without previous CS, Odds Ratio (OR) for emergency CS was 3.65 (CI: 3.26-4.08) higher when compared to women without previous CS [13]. The scibasejournals.org aim of this retrospective study however was to use a large dataset with a specific objective to report on the success and failure rate and to identify any specific predictors of a successful or an unsuccessful vaginal birth in women who are pregnant after one previous CS.
Open Source Publications
Title: Birth after Caesarean Section: A Retrospective Audit of 10 Years of State-Wide Data
Description:
Rates of Caesarean Section (CS) have been increasing worldwide with varying rates of [5] percent in Sub-Saharan Africa to 43 percent in Latin America and the Caribbean [1].
In Australia too rates have increased from 32 percent in 2011 to 38 percent in 20212.
Attempts have been made to seek ways at slowing the rise in rates of CS but with little success [3].
Women who have had a previous CS may elect to have a Elective Repeat CS (ERCS) or have an attempt at a Vaginal Birth (VBAC) in their subsequent pregnancy.
A planned VBAC, considering the woman’s individual history and needs, is viewed as a safe option for many women with a single previous lower segment caesarean section [4].
Studies have shown that a Trial of Labour (TOL) ending in a VBAC is most favourable for the mother, newborn, and the health service [5,6].
Likelihood of success rates are reported to be between 60 and 80 percent [7].
A recent meta-analysis [8] noted successful vaginal birth rates of 74.
3 percent if labour was spontaneous and 60.
7 percent if induced.
Achieving successful VBAC has also been reported to be less expensive and more effective than undergoing an ERCS [9,10].
There has recently been an international multi-centre trial that aims to increase the proportion of women having VBAC by increasing woman-centred care and facilitating women’s empowerment in their choice of birth in three countries – Germany, Ireland and Italy [1].
An attempt at vaginal birth is also supported by various colleges across countries [4,7,12].
One of the reasons for the preference of ERCS may be a concern of a failed trial at vaginal birth resulting in an emergency CS.
In one study of 29 352 women who attempted a vaginal birth after CS compared to 169 377 women without previous CS, Odds Ratio (OR) for emergency CS was 3.
65 (CI: 3.
26-4.
08) higher when compared to women without previous CS [13].
The scibasejournals.
org aim of this retrospective study however was to use a large dataset with a specific objective to report on the success and failure rate and to identify any specific predictors of a successful or an unsuccessful vaginal birth in women who are pregnant after one previous CS.
Related Results
Paper K-9 Pelaporan Hasil Audit dan Tindak Lanjut Audit Internal
Paper K-9 Pelaporan Hasil Audit dan Tindak Lanjut Audit Internal
Pelaporan hasil audit merupakan komponen utama dalam komunikasi dari audit internal tentang hasil audit. Untuk mengkomunikasikan hasil audit diperlukan susunan laporan, dimana hasi...
A study of intra-operative maternal morbidity after repeating caesarean section
A study of intra-operative maternal morbidity after repeating caesarean section
Background: Caesarean section (CS) is one of the most common obstetric procedures worldwide and an increased rate of caesarean section has been observed in recent studies. Maternal...
DETERMINAN FEE AUDIT
DETERMINAN FEE AUDIT
ABSTRACT This study aims to examine the factors that affect audit fees. Factors examined include factors derived from the entity (client) and the factors derived from the auditor....
Spatial and hierarchical Bayesian analysis to identify factors associated with caesarean delivery use in Ethiopia: Evidence from national population and health facility data
Spatial and hierarchical Bayesian analysis to identify factors associated with caesarean delivery use in Ethiopia: Evidence from national population and health facility data
Background
Caesarean section has a significant role in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. A linked analysis of population and health facility data is valuable to map and ide...
Sebuah Jurnal Audit Audit Plan, Audit Program dan Audit Prosedur Pada Harta, Utang dan Modal
Sebuah Jurnal Audit Audit Plan, Audit Program dan Audit Prosedur Pada Harta, Utang dan Modal
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana proses dan prosedur audit plan, audit program dan audit prosedur pada harta, utang dan modal. Penelitian ini juga dimaksudka...
Literature Review Pengaruh Audit Fee, Audit Tenure, Rotasi Audit, Audit Delay, Dan Komite Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit
Literature Review Pengaruh Audit Fee, Audit Tenure, Rotasi Audit, Audit Delay, Dan Komite Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit
Masih terdapat hasil audit yang kurang berkualitas dilihat dari kasus-kasus keuangan terdahulu yang melibatkan akuntan publik. Artikel ini mereview faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi ...
THE ROLE OF AUDIT ROTATION, AUDIT COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT, AUDIT CAPACITY STRESS, AND AUDIT TENURE IN DETERMINING AUDIT QUALITY
THE ROLE OF AUDIT ROTATION, AUDIT COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT, AUDIT CAPACITY STRESS, AND AUDIT TENURE IN DETERMINING AUDIT QUALITY
Abstract— The quality of audits is a crucial factor determining the credibility of financial reporting. This research aims to explore the determinants that impact audit quality for...
PENGARUH AUDIT TENURE, UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, AUDIT DELAY, KOMITE AUDIT, DAN ROTASI AUDIT TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT
PENGARUH AUDIT TENURE, UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, AUDIT DELAY, KOMITE AUDIT, DAN ROTASI AUDIT TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kualitas audit pada perusahaan sektor keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia, dengan fokus pada...

