Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The impact of different antimicrobial exposures on the gut microbiome in the ARMORD observational study

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Better metrics to compare the impact of different antimicrobials on the gut microbiome would aid efforts to control antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Methods The Antibiotic Resistance in the Microbiome – Oxford (ARMORD) study recruited inpatients, outpatients and healthy volunteers in Oxfordshire, UK, who provided stool samples for metagenomic sequencing. Data on previous antimicrobial use and potential confounders were recorded. Exposures to each antimicrobial were considered as factors in a multivariable linear regression, also adjusted for demographics, with separate analyses for those contributing samples cross-sectionally or longitudinally. Outcomes were Shannon diversity and relative abundance of specific bacterial taxa (Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, and major anaerobic groups) and antimicrobial resistance genes (targeting beta-lactams, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, macrolides, and glycopeptides). Results 225 adults were included in the cross-sectional analysis, and a subset of 79 patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplant provided serial samples for longitudinal analysis. Results were largely consistent between the two sampling frames. Recent use of piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, intravenous co-amoxiclav and clindamycin were associated with large reductions in microbiome diversity and reduced abundance of anaerobes. Exposure to piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem were associated with a decreased abundance of Enterobacteriaceae, and an increased abundance of Enterococcus and major AMR genes, but there was no evidence that these antibiotics had a greater impact on microbiome diversity than iv co-amoxiclav or oral clindamycin. In contrast, co-trimoxazole, doxycycline, antifungals and antivirals had less impact on microbiome diversity and selection of AMR genes. Conclusion Simultaneous estimation of the impact of over 20 antimicrobials on the gut microbiome and AMR gene abundance highlighted important differences between individual drugs. Some drugs in the WHO Access group (co-amoxiclav, clindamycin) had similar magnitude impact on microbiome diversity to those in the Watch group (meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam) with potential implications for acquisition of resistant organisms. Metagenomic sequencing can be used to compare the impact of different antimicrobial agents and treatment strategies on the commensal flora.
Title: The impact of different antimicrobial exposures on the gut microbiome in the ARMORD observational study
Description:
Abstract Background Better metrics to compare the impact of different antimicrobials on the gut microbiome would aid efforts to control antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
Methods The Antibiotic Resistance in the Microbiome – Oxford (ARMORD) study recruited inpatients, outpatients and healthy volunteers in Oxfordshire, UK, who provided stool samples for metagenomic sequencing.
Data on previous antimicrobial use and potential confounders were recorded.
Exposures to each antimicrobial were considered as factors in a multivariable linear regression, also adjusted for demographics, with separate analyses for those contributing samples cross-sectionally or longitudinally.
Outcomes were Shannon diversity and relative abundance of specific bacterial taxa (Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, and major anaerobic groups) and antimicrobial resistance genes (targeting beta-lactams, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, macrolides, and glycopeptides).
Results 225 adults were included in the cross-sectional analysis, and a subset of 79 patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplant provided serial samples for longitudinal analysis.
Results were largely consistent between the two sampling frames.
Recent use of piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, intravenous co-amoxiclav and clindamycin were associated with large reductions in microbiome diversity and reduced abundance of anaerobes.
Exposure to piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem were associated with a decreased abundance of Enterobacteriaceae, and an increased abundance of Enterococcus and major AMR genes, but there was no evidence that these antibiotics had a greater impact on microbiome diversity than iv co-amoxiclav or oral clindamycin.
In contrast, co-trimoxazole, doxycycline, antifungals and antivirals had less impact on microbiome diversity and selection of AMR genes.
Conclusion Simultaneous estimation of the impact of over 20 antimicrobials on the gut microbiome and AMR gene abundance highlighted important differences between individual drugs.
Some drugs in the WHO Access group (co-amoxiclav, clindamycin) had similar magnitude impact on microbiome diversity to those in the Watch group (meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam) with potential implications for acquisition of resistant organisms.
Metagenomic sequencing can be used to compare the impact of different antimicrobial agents and treatment strategies on the commensal flora.

Related Results

The impact of different antimicrobial exposures on the gut microbiome in the ARMORD observational study
The impact of different antimicrobial exposures on the gut microbiome in the ARMORD observational study
Abstract Background Better metrics to compare the impact of different antimicrobials on the gut microbiome would aid efforts to control antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Methods The ...
Impact of urbanization on gut microbiome mosaics across geographic and dietary contexts
Impact of urbanization on gut microbiome mosaics across geographic and dietary contexts
ABSTRACT This study provides a comprehensive assessment of how urban-rural divides influence gut microbial diversity and composit...
Quantifying the impact of Human Leukocyte Antigen on the human gut microbiome
Quantifying the impact of Human Leukocyte Antigen on the human gut microbiome
AbstractObjectiveThe gut microbiome is affected by a number of factors, including the innate and adaptive immune system. The major histocompatibility complex (MHC), or the human le...
Fecal microbiome predicts treatment response after the initiation of semaglutide or empagliflozin uptake
Fecal microbiome predicts treatment response after the initiation of semaglutide or empagliflozin uptake
The gut microbiome has been shown to be affected by the use of many human-targeted medications, and the interaction can be bidirectional. This has been clearly demonstrated for typ...
Relationship between gut microbiota and Hashimoto’ s thyroiditis: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study
Relationship between gut microbiota and Hashimoto’ s thyroiditis: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study
Abstract Background Hashimoto's thyroiditis(HT)is one of the most common autoimmune diseases. Observational studies have proved that the gut microbiome is related to the o...
Impact of gut permeability on the breast microbiome using a non-human primate model
Impact of gut permeability on the breast microbiome using a non-human primate model
Abstract We previously demonstrated in non-human primates (NHP) that Mediterranean diet consumption shifted the proportional abundance of Lactobacillus in the breast and gut. Th...
Gut Microbiome and Health Assessment Due To Arsenic Toxicity: A Review
Gut Microbiome and Health Assessment Due To Arsenic Toxicity: A Review
Arsenic is considered as a class 1 carcinogen and first among toxicants ranked by the Environmental Protection Agency. Arsenic toxicity includes  deleterious effect on  gut  microb...

Back to Top