Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Informal interactions between audit committees and internal audit functions

View through CrossRef
PurposeThis paper aims to recognise the importance of informal processes within corporate governance and complement existing research in this area by investigating factors associated with the existence of informal interactions between audit committees and internal audit functions and in providing directions for future research.Design/methodology/approachTo examine the existence and drivers of informal interactions between audit committees and internal audit functions, this paper relies on a questionnaire survey of chief audit executives (CAEs) in the UK from listed and non‐listed, as well as financial and non‐financial, companies. While prior qualitative research suggests that informal interactions do take place, most of the evidence is based on particular organisational setting or on a very small range of interviews. The use of a questionnaire enabled the examination of the existence of internal interactions across a relatively larger number of entities.FindingsThe paper finds evidence of audit committees and internal audit functions engaging in informal interactions in addition to formal pre‐scheduled regular meetings. Informal interactions complement formal meetings with the audit committee and as such represent additional opportunities for the audit committees to monitor internal audit functions. Audit committees' informal interactions are significantly and positively associated with audit committee independence, audit chair's knowledge and experience, and internal audit quality.Originality/valueThe results demonstrate the importance of the background of the audit committee chair for the effectiveness of the governance process. This is possibly the first paper to examine the relationship between audit committee quality and internal audit, on the existence and driver of informal interactions. Policy makers should recognize that in addition to formal mechanisms, informal processes, such as communication outside of formal pre‐scheduled meetings, play a significant role in corporate governance.
Title: Informal interactions between audit committees and internal audit functions
Description:
PurposeThis paper aims to recognise the importance of informal processes within corporate governance and complement existing research in this area by investigating factors associated with the existence of informal interactions between audit committees and internal audit functions and in providing directions for future research.
Design/methodology/approachTo examine the existence and drivers of informal interactions between audit committees and internal audit functions, this paper relies on a questionnaire survey of chief audit executives (CAEs) in the UK from listed and non‐listed, as well as financial and non‐financial, companies.
While prior qualitative research suggests that informal interactions do take place, most of the evidence is based on particular organisational setting or on a very small range of interviews.
The use of a questionnaire enabled the examination of the existence of internal interactions across a relatively larger number of entities.
FindingsThe paper finds evidence of audit committees and internal audit functions engaging in informal interactions in addition to formal pre‐scheduled regular meetings.
Informal interactions complement formal meetings with the audit committee and as such represent additional opportunities for the audit committees to monitor internal audit functions.
Audit committees' informal interactions are significantly and positively associated with audit committee independence, audit chair's knowledge and experience, and internal audit quality.
Originality/valueThe results demonstrate the importance of the background of the audit committee chair for the effectiveness of the governance process.
This is possibly the first paper to examine the relationship between audit committee quality and internal audit, on the existence and driver of informal interactions.
Policy makers should recognize that in addition to formal mechanisms, informal processes, such as communication outside of formal pre‐scheduled meetings, play a significant role in corporate governance.

Related Results

Paper K-9 Pelaporan Hasil Audit dan Tindak Lanjut Audit Internal
Paper K-9 Pelaporan Hasil Audit dan Tindak Lanjut Audit Internal
Pelaporan hasil audit merupakan komponen utama dalam komunikasi dari audit internal tentang hasil audit. Untuk mengkomunikasikan hasil audit diperlukan susunan laporan, dimana hasi...
Hubungan Kualitas Audit, Komite Audit, dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah terhadap Kinerja Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia
Hubungan Kualitas Audit, Komite Audit, dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah terhadap Kinerja Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia
ABSTRAK Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengetahui hubungan kualitas audit, komite audit, dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah (DPS) terhadap kinerja Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia pada tahun...
Improving the Quality of the External Audit and Their Role in the Audit Committees
Improving the Quality of the External Audit and Their Role in the Audit Committees
The study reviews committees and their role in improving the external audit quality through examining a case study of Sudanese banks. The study problem can be formulated from the f...
Pengaruh Audit Tenure dan Audit Delay terhadap Kualitas Audit
Pengaruh Audit Tenure dan Audit Delay terhadap Kualitas Audit
Abstract. The mining industry contributes significantly to the Indonesian economy, but its complexity requires audit quality to ensure transparency of financial statements. Audit t...
DETERMINAN FEE AUDIT
DETERMINAN FEE AUDIT
ABSTRACT This study aims to examine the factors that affect audit fees. Factors examined include  factors derived from the entity (client) and the factors derived from the auditor....
PERAN AUDIT FEE DAN FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KUALITAS AUDIT
PERAN AUDIT FEE DAN FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KUALITAS AUDIT
Abstract: This research purpose to obtain empirical evidence regarding factor that has an influence on audit quality, such as the audit firm reputation, audit tenure and auditor sw...

Back to Top