Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A New Standoff-Factor Formula for Orthovoltage Radiotherapy Treatments
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Orthovoltage x-rays are useful for the treatment of some superficial cancers and benign conditions. An orthovoltage machine has numerous different applicators (open and closed ended) and energies that require measurements for all different applicator-energy combinations in addition to patient-specific Standoff Factor (SF) measurements, which is arduous and time-consuming. This study aimed to introduce a simple, accurate, and practical method to calculate SF.
This factor is usually calculated based on the inverse square law (ISL), which is not an accurate approximation for closed-ended applicators. In this work, we introduced a simple, accurate, and practical method to calculate SF that is valid for both open-ended and closed-ended applicators. Xstrahl 300 therapy unit was used with two sets of Open-ended and Closed-ended applicators with energies up to 300 kVp. The proposed SF empirical formula and ISL were evaluated against the measurements. For open-ended applicators, the maximum Percentage Differences (PD) in calculated SF using the suggested formula and ISL were 2.2% and 3.4% relative to the measurement, respectively. For closed-ended applicators, the maximum PD was 3.2% and -8.1% using the suggested formula and ISL relative to the measurement, respectively. The results demonstrated satisfactory accuracy compared to the measured standoff factor values and superior accuracy when compared to the commonly used ISL method, particularly for closed-ended applicators. The study concluded that SF calculated using the proposed formula was in agreement with measured SF at clinically relevant standoff distances for all energies and applicators combinations. Thus, we recommend using this proposed formula for SF calculations.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: A New Standoff-Factor Formula for Orthovoltage Radiotherapy Treatments
Description:
Abstract
Orthovoltage x-rays are useful for the treatment of some superficial cancers and benign conditions.
An orthovoltage machine has numerous different applicators (open and closed ended) and energies that require measurements for all different applicator-energy combinations in addition to patient-specific Standoff Factor (SF) measurements, which is arduous and time-consuming.
This study aimed to introduce a simple, accurate, and practical method to calculate SF.
This factor is usually calculated based on the inverse square law (ISL), which is not an accurate approximation for closed-ended applicators.
In this work, we introduced a simple, accurate, and practical method to calculate SF that is valid for both open-ended and closed-ended applicators.
Xstrahl 300 therapy unit was used with two sets of Open-ended and Closed-ended applicators with energies up to 300 kVp.
The proposed SF empirical formula and ISL were evaluated against the measurements.
For open-ended applicators, the maximum Percentage Differences (PD) in calculated SF using the suggested formula and ISL were 2.
2% and 3.
4% relative to the measurement, respectively.
For closed-ended applicators, the maximum PD was 3.
2% and -8.
1% using the suggested formula and ISL relative to the measurement, respectively.
The results demonstrated satisfactory accuracy compared to the measured standoff factor values and superior accuracy when compared to the commonly used ISL method, particularly for closed-ended applicators.
The study concluded that SF calculated using the proposed formula was in agreement with measured SF at clinically relevant standoff distances for all energies and applicators combinations.
Thus, we recommend using this proposed formula for SF calculations.
Related Results
Bounds on the sum of broadcast domination number and strong metric dimension of graphs
Bounds on the sum of broadcast domination number and strong metric dimension of graphs
Let [Formula: see text] be a connected graph of order at least two with vertex set [Formula: see text]. For [Formula: see text], let [Formula: see text] denote the length of an [Fo...
Theoretical study of laser-cooled SH<sup>–</sup> anion
Theoretical study of laser-cooled SH<sup>–</sup> anion
The potential energy curves, dipole moments, and transition dipole moments for the <inline-formula><tex-math id="M13">\begin{document}${{\rm{X}}^1}{\Sigma ^ + }$\end{do...
A saturation problem in meshes
A saturation problem in meshes
Let [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] be graphs, where we view [Formula: see text] as the “host” graph and [Formula: see text] as a “forbidden” graph. A spanning subgraph...
When is R[θ] integrally closed?
When is R[θ] integrally closed?
Let [Formula: see text] be an integrally closed domain with quotient field [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] be an element of an integral domain containing [Formula: see ...
Inductive graph invariants and approximation algorithms
Inductive graph invariants and approximation algorithms
We introduce and study an inductively defined analogue [Formula: see text] of any increasing graph invariant [Formula: see text]. An invariant [Formula: see text] is increasing if ...
Revisiting near-threshold photoelectron interference in argon with a non-adiabatic semiclassical model
Revisiting near-threshold photoelectron interference in argon with a non-adiabatic semiclassical model
<sec> <b>Purpose:</b> The interaction of intense, ultrashort laser pulses with atoms gives rise to rich non-perturbative phenomena, which are encoded within th...
The Aα-eigenvalues of the generalized subdivision graph
The Aα-eigenvalues of the generalized subdivision graph
Let [Formula: see text] be a graph with an adjacency matrix [Formula: see text] and a diagonal degree matrix [Formula: see text]. For any graph [Formula: see text] and a real numbe...
Ld(2,1)-labeling on T-graphs
Ld(2,1)-labeling on T-graphs
In this paper, we are concerned with the [Formula: see text]-Graphs, which are graphs defined based on the Topological structure of the given set. Precisely, for a given topology [...

