Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Direct interactions between invasive plants and native pollinators: evidence, impacts and approaches
View through CrossRef
Summary
Invasive non‐native plants form interactions with native species and have the potential to cause direct and indirect impacts on those species, as well as the functioning of invaded ecosystems.
Many entomophilous invasive plants form interactions with resident pollinators; sometimes, these interactions are necessary for the reproductive success of the invader. However, the direct role native pollinators play in plant invasion is not well understood and varies according to invasive plant traits, including breeding system and pollination syndrome.
The majority of studies addressing impacts on plant–pollinator mutualisms have focussed on the indirect impacts of plant invasion for native plant pollination. Fewer studies have focussed on the direct effects of invasive plants on native flower visitors.
Impacts of invasive plants on native pollinators can occur at a range of scales: from the individual flower visitors (in terms of nutrition, health and fitness), to populations (size, density and growth rates), communities (richness, diversity and composition) and community‐level interactions (insect–flower interaction networks). Most research to date has focussed on community‐level impacts, with almost nothing known about the effects of invaders on native flower visitor individuals or populations.
Invasive plant traits, including reward quantity and quality, spatial and temporal availability and accessibility, modulate effects on native flower visitors, and thus, different plant species have different impacts. Similarly, flower visitors do not all respond in the same way to invasive plants. Thus, generalizations are difficult to make, but understanding impacts at the individual and population level for different visitor taxa is key to explaining community‐level impacts.
There have been varied approaches to determining impacts, with most studies attempting to compare invaded vs. non‐invaded habitats. The pros and cons of different approaches are discussed.
Since it is impractical to study every invasive plant in every ecological context in which it occurs, we recommend a better understanding of relevant individual‐level traits to predict direct interactions between invasive plants and native pollinators.
A Lay Summary is available for this article.
Title: Direct interactions between invasive plants and native pollinators: evidence, impacts and approaches
Description:
Summary
Invasive non‐native plants form interactions with native species and have the potential to cause direct and indirect impacts on those species, as well as the functioning of invaded ecosystems.
Many entomophilous invasive plants form interactions with resident pollinators; sometimes, these interactions are necessary for the reproductive success of the invader.
However, the direct role native pollinators play in plant invasion is not well understood and varies according to invasive plant traits, including breeding system and pollination syndrome.
The majority of studies addressing impacts on plant–pollinator mutualisms have focussed on the indirect impacts of plant invasion for native plant pollination.
Fewer studies have focussed on the direct effects of invasive plants on native flower visitors.
Impacts of invasive plants on native pollinators can occur at a range of scales: from the individual flower visitors (in terms of nutrition, health and fitness), to populations (size, density and growth rates), communities (richness, diversity and composition) and community‐level interactions (insect–flower interaction networks).
Most research to date has focussed on community‐level impacts, with almost nothing known about the effects of invaders on native flower visitor individuals or populations.
Invasive plant traits, including reward quantity and quality, spatial and temporal availability and accessibility, modulate effects on native flower visitors, and thus, different plant species have different impacts.
Similarly, flower visitors do not all respond in the same way to invasive plants.
Thus, generalizations are difficult to make, but understanding impacts at the individual and population level for different visitor taxa is key to explaining community‐level impacts.
There have been varied approaches to determining impacts, with most studies attempting to compare invaded vs.
non‐invaded habitats.
The pros and cons of different approaches are discussed.
Since it is impractical to study every invasive plant in every ecological context in which it occurs, we recommend a better understanding of relevant individual‐level traits to predict direct interactions between invasive plants and native pollinators.
A Lay Summary is available for this article.
Related Results
Impacts of man-made structures on marine biodiversity and species status - native & non-native species
Impacts of man-made structures on marine biodiversity and species status - native & non-native species
<p>Coastal environments are exposed to anthropogenic activities such as frequent marine traffic and restructuring, i.e., addition, removal or replacing with man-made structur...
Urbanization increases floral fidelity of pollinators
Urbanization increases floral fidelity of pollinators
Understanding how urbanization alters functional interactions among
pollinators and plants is critically important given increasing
anthropogenic land use and declines in pollinato...
Assessment of Invasive Species Severity along the Nature Trail at the Doi Chiang Dao Biosphere Reserve, Chiang Mai Province
Assessment of Invasive Species Severity along the Nature Trail at the Doi Chiang Dao Biosphere Reserve, Chiang Mai Province
Background and Objectives: Doi Chiang Dao Biosphere Reserve has been officially declared as the fifth Biosphere Reserve of Thailand, representing a critically important terrestrial...
Comparative Study of Pollination Efficiency in Native vs. Invasive Insects
Comparative Study of Pollination Efficiency in Native vs. Invasive Insects
The effectiveness of pollinators differs greatly among species and ecological settings, despite their vital role in sustaining biodiversity and agricultural output. Invasive insect...
New directions in pollinator research: diversity, conflict and response to global change
New directions in pollinator research: diversity, conflict and response to global change
Interactions between pollinators and their plant hosts are central to maintaining global biodiversity and ensuring our food security. In this special issue, we compile reviews that...
The role of plant-plant facilitation in non-native plant invasions.
The role of plant-plant facilitation in non-native plant invasions.
Abstract
Biological invasions are one the most important drivers of the current environmental changes generating important biodiversity losses. Although several hypotheses ...
The biology of incipient, pre-invasive or intraepithelial neoplasia
The biology of incipient, pre-invasive or intraepithelial neoplasia
Invasive tumors (cancers or malignant lesions) typically develop in the setting in which there is the presence of putative non-invasive lesions and the development of these non-inv...
Interactive effects of climate change and plant invasion on alpine biodiversity and ecosystem dynamics
Interactive effects of climate change and plant invasion on alpine biodiversity and ecosystem dynamics
<p>Drivers of global change have direct impacts on the structure of communities and functioning of ecosystems, and interactions between drivers may buffer or exacerbate these...

