Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

An empirical assessment of common or usual names to label cell‐based seafood products

View through CrossRef
Abstract An important consideration in the commercialization of cell‐based meat, poultry, and seafood is what common or usual name to use on package labels to meet U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations. However, naming these products has been the subject of considerable debate. This study used a 3 × 10 between‐subjects online experiment involving a quota sample of 3,186 U.S. adult panel participants to test common or usual names using images of realistic packages of three types of seafood that a consumer might encounter in a supermarket. The terms tested were, “cell‐based seafood,” “cell‐cultured seafood,” “cultivated seafood,” and “cultured seafood” and the phrases, “produced using cellular aquaculture,” “cultivated from the cells of ____,” and “grown directly from the cells of ____,” where the blanks are filled by the name of the seafood product. Five criteria were used for evaluation, including each term's ability to: enable consumers to distinguish cell‐based seafood from wild and farmed fish, to signal potential allergenicity, be seen by consumers as an appropriate term to identify the product, not disparage either cell‐based or conventional products, and not evoke thoughts, images, or emotions that are inconsistent with the idea that the products are safe, healthy, and nutritious. The results showed that “cell‐based seafood” outperforms the other names tested. It enables consumers to recognize that the products are neither wild caught nor farm raised, signals potential allergenicity, is seen as an appropriate name for describing the technology/process, and it performs well with respect to measures of consumer acceptance, particularly in comparison to conventional products. Practical Application Creating consensus around a single common or usual name for cell‐based meat, poultry, and seafood products is clearly important both for regulatory reasons and for shaping public perceptions and understanding of the products that are labeled with it. Our findings suggest that “cell‐based” is the best common or usual name for seafood products that both meets FDA regulatory requirements and performs well with respect to potential consumer acceptance. Consistent use of this term by industry, advocates, and regulators would help orient consumers to what is likely to be a transformational food technology.
Title: An empirical assessment of common or usual names to label cell‐based seafood products
Description:
Abstract An important consideration in the commercialization of cell‐based meat, poultry, and seafood is what common or usual name to use on package labels to meet U.
S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations.
However, naming these products has been the subject of considerable debate.
This study used a 3 × 10 between‐subjects online experiment involving a quota sample of 3,186 U.
S.
adult panel participants to test common or usual names using images of realistic packages of three types of seafood that a consumer might encounter in a supermarket.
The terms tested were, “cell‐based seafood,” “cell‐cultured seafood,” “cultivated seafood,” and “cultured seafood” and the phrases, “produced using cellular aquaculture,” “cultivated from the cells of ____,” and “grown directly from the cells of ____,” where the blanks are filled by the name of the seafood product.
Five criteria were used for evaluation, including each term's ability to: enable consumers to distinguish cell‐based seafood from wild and farmed fish, to signal potential allergenicity, be seen by consumers as an appropriate term to identify the product, not disparage either cell‐based or conventional products, and not evoke thoughts, images, or emotions that are inconsistent with the idea that the products are safe, healthy, and nutritious.
The results showed that “cell‐based seafood” outperforms the other names tested.
It enables consumers to recognize that the products are neither wild caught nor farm raised, signals potential allergenicity, is seen as an appropriate name for describing the technology/process, and it performs well with respect to measures of consumer acceptance, particularly in comparison to conventional products.
Practical Application Creating consensus around a single common or usual name for cell‐based meat, poultry, and seafood products is clearly important both for regulatory reasons and for shaping public perceptions and understanding of the products that are labeled with it.
Our findings suggest that “cell‐based” is the best common or usual name for seafood products that both meets FDA regulatory requirements and performs well with respect to potential consumer acceptance.
Consistent use of this term by industry, advocates, and regulators would help orient consumers to what is likely to be a transformational food technology.

Related Results

A Comparison of Cell-Based and Cell-Cultured as Appropriate Common or Usual Names to Label Products Made from the Cells of Fish
A Comparison of Cell-Based and Cell-Cultured as Appropriate Common or Usual Names to Label Products Made from the Cells of Fish
ABSTRACT Using an online experiment with a nationally representative sample of 1200 adult American consumers, two “common or usual names,” “Cell-Based Seafood” and ...
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Maternal seafood consumption and fetal growth: a birth cohort study in urban China
Maternal seafood consumption and fetal growth: a birth cohort study in urban China
Abstract Background Seafood is a good source of essential fatty acids which has a presumably beneficial effect on develop...
The current state of the plant nomenclature in crop production on the example of dissertation titles
The current state of the plant nomenclature in crop production on the example of dissertation titles
Aim. The aim of this article is to analyze the current state of plant nomenclature in agricultural practice. Methods. The analysis of literary sources, mathematical analysis. Resul...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Identifying future climate risks embedded in international seafood import portfolios
Identifying future climate risks embedded in international seafood import portfolios
Seafood, one of the most highly traded commodities, benefits diverse livelihoods and supports global nutrition by supplying critical fatty acids, micronutrients, and animal protein...
Vadja asustusnimed
Vadja asustusnimed
The Votian habitation names The paper deals with Votic habitation names in a broader sense than usual, encompassing, apart from the names of settlements and their subdivisions, a...
Asustusnimed Kiili vallas; 109-126
Asustusnimed Kiili vallas; 109-126
 Settlement names in Kiili municipality The paper provides a survey of the settlement names used in the municipality of Kiili, Harju county. As a regional study it is intended to...

Back to Top