Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The California Indian Scalp Bounty Myth

View through CrossRef
In the often contentious and acrimonious debates over whether the Golden State’s Indigenous peoples were targeted for genocide by white Euro-Americans between 1846 and 1873, inflammatory scalp bounty accusations against the state of California have become a staple of public discourse. California is frequently accused by public leaders, political activists, academic scholars, and others of once having paid cash rewards ranging anywhere from twenty-five cents to twenty-five dollars for Indian scalps, heads, and other body parts in order to wage a deliberate “war of extermination” against its Native peoples. So routinely are these allegations made that they now go largely uncontested and appear to have won nearly universal acceptance as established historical facts. These “facts,” however, are false. The state of California never offered, let alone actually paid, cash bounties for Native American scalps, heads, or other body parts. And, despite numerous similar claims to the contrary, neither did any county—nor, with one possible exception, did any incorporated town or city. Nevertheless, thanks in large part to repeated and unchallenged assertions based on very faulty scholarship, scalp bounty allegations have been allowed to evolve over the past thirty years to become a popular but polarizing myth that serves mainly to inflame public passions and to frustrate rational discourse in what are frequently bruising public quarrels over vital contemporary issues such as tribal sovereignty, reparations for past injustices, casino gaming regulation, and, of course, disputed points of historical interpretation central to the genocide debate. This essay traces the evolution of the pervasive California Indian scalp bounty myth from its origins in the 1990s and examines the numerous different versions that its propagators have put forth over time, despite a near-total lack of concrete supporting evidence. Although scalping itself was widely practiced by state militiamen and volunteer “Indian fighters” like the infamous Jackson Farley and Hi Good, the taking of corporal trophies in California’s genocidal frontier wars did not result from the pursuit of financial reward. Indeed, the remarkably small number of documented cases reveals that Indian scalp bounties remained extremely rare in gold rush California and were seldom offered anywhere except in a scattered handful of isolated and unincorporated rural communities.
University of California Press
Title: The California Indian Scalp Bounty Myth
Description:
In the often contentious and acrimonious debates over whether the Golden State’s Indigenous peoples were targeted for genocide by white Euro-Americans between 1846 and 1873, inflammatory scalp bounty accusations against the state of California have become a staple of public discourse.
California is frequently accused by public leaders, political activists, academic scholars, and others of once having paid cash rewards ranging anywhere from twenty-five cents to twenty-five dollars for Indian scalps, heads, and other body parts in order to wage a deliberate “war of extermination” against its Native peoples.
So routinely are these allegations made that they now go largely uncontested and appear to have won nearly universal acceptance as established historical facts.
These “facts,” however, are false.
The state of California never offered, let alone actually paid, cash bounties for Native American scalps, heads, or other body parts.
And, despite numerous similar claims to the contrary, neither did any county—nor, with one possible exception, did any incorporated town or city.
Nevertheless, thanks in large part to repeated and unchallenged assertions based on very faulty scholarship, scalp bounty allegations have been allowed to evolve over the past thirty years to become a popular but polarizing myth that serves mainly to inflame public passions and to frustrate rational discourse in what are frequently bruising public quarrels over vital contemporary issues such as tribal sovereignty, reparations for past injustices, casino gaming regulation, and, of course, disputed points of historical interpretation central to the genocide debate.
This essay traces the evolution of the pervasive California Indian scalp bounty myth from its origins in the 1990s and examines the numerous different versions that its propagators have put forth over time, despite a near-total lack of concrete supporting evidence.
Although scalping itself was widely practiced by state militiamen and volunteer “Indian fighters” like the infamous Jackson Farley and Hi Good, the taking of corporal trophies in California’s genocidal frontier wars did not result from the pursuit of financial reward.
Indeed, the remarkably small number of documented cases reveals that Indian scalp bounties remained extremely rare in gold rush California and were seldom offered anywhere except in a scattered handful of isolated and unincorporated rural communities.

Related Results

Sensitive Scalp: A Possible Association With the Use of Hair Conditioners
Sensitive Scalp: A Possible Association With the Use of Hair Conditioners
A sensitive scalp is defined by the occurrence of unpleasant sensations (tingling, burning, pain, pruritus) triggered by stimuli that should not cause such sensations. Environmenta...
Kritik Mitos Tentang “Hang Tuah” Karya Amir Hamzah
Kritik Mitos Tentang “Hang Tuah” Karya Amir Hamzah
This study reveals the myth criticism on rhyme "Hang Tuah", an Amir Hamzah’s work expressing Malay myth. The Malay myth found in the rhyme "Hang Tuah" is placed as a meeting place ...
Manifestation of Hippocampal Interictal Discharges on Clinical Scalp EEG Recordings
Manifestation of Hippocampal Interictal Discharges on Clinical Scalp EEG Recordings
Purpose: Epileptiform activity limited to deep sources such as the hippocampus currently lacks reliable scalp correlates. Recent studies, however, have found that a sub...
Characteristics of Sensitive Scalp in French Women and Comparison With Scalp Dermatoses
Characteristics of Sensitive Scalp in French Women and Comparison With Scalp Dermatoses
ABSTRACT Background A sensitive scalp is a particular location of sensitive skin, characterised by the occurrence of unpl...
Abstract P1-21-02: Scalp sparing whole-brain radiotherapy using IMRT technique. Do we need it?
Abstract P1-21-02: Scalp sparing whole-brain radiotherapy using IMRT technique. Do we need it?
Abstract Introduction: The prognosis of metastatic breast cancer patients is improving due to advances in systemic therapy, which led to better control of the diseas...
Orthogonal Curve Analysis of Human Scalp Shape
Orthogonal Curve Analysis of Human Scalp Shape
This paper presents a shape analysis on orthogonal feature curves of 3D bald head scans with the intention of predicting scalp shape under the hair. While there are currently a num...
Atypical Presentations of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Case Series with Literature Review
Atypical Presentations of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Case Series with Literature Review
Abstract Introduction: Pilonidal sinus (PNS) typically arises in the sacrococcygeal region but can occasionally present in atypical locations, including the axilla, intermammary re...
Fetal Scalp Lactate Microsampling for Non-Reassuring Fetal Status during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study
Fetal Scalp Lactate Microsampling for Non-Reassuring Fetal Status during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study
<i>Objective:</i> The aim was to study the predictive value and feasibility of fetal scalp lactate microsampling in the management of non-reassuring fetal status during...

Back to Top