Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Bearing Characteristics of Multi-Wing Pile Foundations under Lateral Loads in Dapeng Bay Silty Clay

View through CrossRef
This study provides a theoretical basis for reinforcement of the soil around multi-wing piles. Limit analysis was used to determine the ultimate lateral capacity (ULC) of three- and four-wing piles in Dapeng Bay silty clay. The effects of the pile–soil interaction coefficient α, wing width Bw, and lateral-load direction β on the ULC of the pile and the shear plastic zone range of the surrounding soil were analyzed. The normalized ULC of the three-wing pile decreased when the wing–diameter ratio increased. When Bw was 0.15 m and α was 0.4, the ULC of the four-wing pile was 19% higher than that of the three-wing pile. As β increased, the normalized ULC of the four-wing pile decreased, whereas that of the three-wing pile went through a minimum at 30°. The size of the soil shear plastic ring did not depend on α for either pile type; it increased around the three-wing (but not the four-wing) pile with changes in β. However, there was also a double plastic ring of broken soil around the four-wing pile. The four-wing pile had a more symmetrical influence on the soil around the pile than the three-wing pile.
Title: Bearing Characteristics of Multi-Wing Pile Foundations under Lateral Loads in Dapeng Bay Silty Clay
Description:
This study provides a theoretical basis for reinforcement of the soil around multi-wing piles.
Limit analysis was used to determine the ultimate lateral capacity (ULC) of three- and four-wing piles in Dapeng Bay silty clay.
The effects of the pile–soil interaction coefficient α, wing width Bw, and lateral-load direction β on the ULC of the pile and the shear plastic zone range of the surrounding soil were analyzed.
The normalized ULC of the three-wing pile decreased when the wing–diameter ratio increased.
When Bw was 0.
15 m and α was 0.
4, the ULC of the four-wing pile was 19% higher than that of the three-wing pile.
As β increased, the normalized ULC of the four-wing pile decreased, whereas that of the three-wing pile went through a minimum at 30°.
The size of the soil shear plastic ring did not depend on α for either pile type; it increased around the three-wing (but not the four-wing) pile with changes in β.
However, there was also a double plastic ring of broken soil around the four-wing pile.
The four-wing pile had a more symmetrical influence on the soil around the pile than the three-wing pile.

Related Results

Analysis Of Three-Dimensional Pile Groups With Nonlinear Soil Response And Pile-Soil-Pile Interaction
Analysis Of Three-Dimensional Pile Groups With Nonlinear Soil Response And Pile-Soil-Pile Interaction
ABSTRACT Present methods of pile group analysis are either limited to special geometric cases or do not consider pile-soil-pile interaction. An analytical procedu...
Pile–Soil Interaction and Group Pile Effect in Composite Foundation Under Different Pile Length Conditions
Pile–Soil Interaction and Group Pile Effect in Composite Foundation Under Different Pile Length Conditions
With the rapid development of urbanization and infrastructure construction, the requirements for the foundation design of high-rise buildings and large bridges are increasing. Pile...
Model Test of Jacked Pile Penetration Process Considering Influence of Pile Diameter
Model Test of Jacked Pile Penetration Process Considering Influence of Pile Diameter
In order to investigate the influence of different diameters on pile end resistance, pile side resistance, pile axial force and pile force transmission law of jacked pile penetrati...
Pile Driving Measurements On The Heather Platform Installation
Pile Driving Measurements On The Heather Platform Installation
Abstract The first leg piles of the Heather Platform were instrumented using strain transducers and accelerometers that were attached to the pile just below its t...
Simplified Heat Transfer Model for Spiral‐Coil Energy Pile Groups and the Pile–Pile Thermal Interference
Simplified Heat Transfer Model for Spiral‐Coil Energy Pile Groups and the Pile–Pile Thermal Interference
ABSTRACTThe spiral heat exchanger of the energy pile groups is divided into multiple segments. Each heat exchanger segment is regarded as a three‐dimensional spiral heat source of ...
Behaviour of rock socketed pile groups
Behaviour of rock socketed pile groups
Rock socketed pile groups are extensively employed in the construction industry due to their effectiveness in maximizing space utilization while supporting substantial structural l...
A New Way to Predict Capacity of Piles in Clay
A New Way to Predict Capacity of Piles in Clay
ABSTRACT According to a new concept proposed for correlating results of pile load tests with soil parameters, the total frictional capacity of pipe piles embedded...
Application of Model Pile Tests to Axial Pile Design
Application of Model Pile Tests to Axial Pile Design
ABSTRACT Experiments conducted with instrumented model pile segment probes at Harvey and Empire, Louisiana are summarized and the observed behavior interpreted. C...

Back to Top