Javascript must be enabled to continue!
61 THE 5-YEAR RESULTS FOR ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF SUPERFICIAL ESOPHAGEAL CANCER AT A NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Superficial esophageal cancer (HGD = high grade dysplasia, T1a and T1b with no evidence of spread) accounts for about 20 % of all esophageal cancers. Traditionally, radical esophagectomy, with a significant degree of comorbidity has been the mainstay of treatment. Now most international guidelines, including the ESGE (European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy) recommends endoscopic treatment as the first choice of treatment. The aim of this abstract was to present our data from 2014-2018.
Methods
From 2014 to 2018 (and ongoing) we have registered all patients endoscopically treated for LGD (low grade dysplasia) and superficial esophageal cancer, including some cases with T1b. The patient material, including treatment modality, histology, time of follow-up, the need for surgery and its outcome were registered. The majority of follow-ups took place at our hospital. Data was also retrieved from cases of late follow-up at other hospitals.
Results
86 patients were endoscopically treated. The histology revealed LGD (24%), HGD (50%) and adenocarcinoma (21%). 15% were treated for a T1a tumor, 7% for T1b. 29% underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), 29% radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and 40% had both. The endoscopic treatment resulted in complete resolution of dysplasia in 64%, downstaging in 11%, whilst progression occurred in 11%. Five patients were operated for initial T1b or progression into T1b. The operation specimen showed no residual tumor in 3/5 patients. There were no serious complications. 90-days mortality was 1%.
Conclusion
Endoscopic treatment is a safe and efficient treatment option for superficial esophageal cancer. Few patients needed surgery and there was few and exclusively mild complications. This treatment modality will spare many patients for esophageal surgery with its associated high level of comorbidity.
Title: 61 THE 5-YEAR RESULTS FOR ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF SUPERFICIAL ESOPHAGEAL CANCER AT A NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Description:
Abstract
Superficial esophageal cancer (HGD = high grade dysplasia, T1a and T1b with no evidence of spread) accounts for about 20 % of all esophageal cancers.
Traditionally, radical esophagectomy, with a significant degree of comorbidity has been the mainstay of treatment.
Now most international guidelines, including the ESGE (European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy) recommends endoscopic treatment as the first choice of treatment.
The aim of this abstract was to present our data from 2014-2018.
Methods
From 2014 to 2018 (and ongoing) we have registered all patients endoscopically treated for LGD (low grade dysplasia) and superficial esophageal cancer, including some cases with T1b.
The patient material, including treatment modality, histology, time of follow-up, the need for surgery and its outcome were registered.
The majority of follow-ups took place at our hospital.
Data was also retrieved from cases of late follow-up at other hospitals.
Results
86 patients were endoscopically treated.
The histology revealed LGD (24%), HGD (50%) and adenocarcinoma (21%).
15% were treated for a T1a tumor, 7% for T1b.
29% underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), 29% radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and 40% had both.
The endoscopic treatment resulted in complete resolution of dysplasia in 64%, downstaging in 11%, whilst progression occurred in 11%.
Five patients were operated for initial T1b or progression into T1b.
The operation specimen showed no residual tumor in 3/5 patients.
There were no serious complications.
90-days mortality was 1%.
Conclusion
Endoscopic treatment is a safe and efficient treatment option for superficial esophageal cancer.
Few patients needed surgery and there was few and exclusively mild complications.
This treatment modality will spare many patients for esophageal surgery with its associated high level of comorbidity.
Related Results
The analysis on Tiam2 for expression in esophageal carcinoma: A descriptive study
The analysis on Tiam2 for expression in esophageal carcinoma: A descriptive study
Rationale:
To investigate T lymphoma invasion and metastasis inducing factor 2 (Tiam2) protein for expression in esophageal carcinoma and relationship with clinical fea...
Molecular Marker Discovery and effect Evaluation of KRT17 and COL1A1 in Esophageal Cancer Detection
Molecular Marker Discovery and effect Evaluation of KRT17 and COL1A1 in Esophageal Cancer Detection
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is one of the malignant tumors in the digestive system. Because the early symptoms of esophageal cancer are occult and lack effective screening o...
PS02.096: ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR ESOPHAGEAL HIGH-GRADE SQUAMOUS DYSPLASIA: A CASE REPORT
PS02.096: ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR ESOPHAGEAL HIGH-GRADE SQUAMOUS DYSPLASIA: A CASE REPORT
Abstract
Background
Endoscopic resection is a novel therapeutic technique for early esophageal cancer and it is indicated in wel...
CircBCAR3 accelerates esophageal cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis via sponging miR-27a-3p
CircBCAR3 accelerates esophageal cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis via sponging miR-27a-3p
Abstract
Rationale
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been demonstrated to contribute to esophageal cancer progression. CircBCAR3 (hsa_circ_0007624) is p...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Esophageal Cancer
Esophageal Cancer
Esophageal cancers are malignancies that can arise along the entire length of the esophagus, from the cervical inlet to the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). The most common histolo...
Two cases of severe esophageal ulcer caused by chemotherapy for breast cancer after particle beam therapy for esophageal cancer
Two cases of severe esophageal ulcer caused by chemotherapy for breast cancer after particle beam therapy for esophageal cancer
Background: Particle beam treatment for esophageal cancer can produce a better local therapeutic effect than can conventional radiotherapy. However, events that occur in the esopha...
O15 ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY OF LUNG TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH SYSTEMIC CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISORDER: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE
O15 ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY OF LUNG TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH SYSTEMIC CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISORDER: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE
Abstract
Aim
To examine the esophageal motility of lung transplant recipients diagnosed with systemic connective tissue disorder...

