Javascript must be enabled to continue!
MELDEQ : An alternative Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
View through CrossRef
Multiple studies have demonstrated an advantage for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients under the current liver allocation system, such that the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) recently voted in support of a proposal to delay granting Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception points to all HCC patients for 6 months, independently of a candidate's native MELD score or alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) level. We obtained UNOS data on adult patients who were added to the wait list between January 22, 2005 and September 30, 2009, and we explored the relationship between HCC, MELD, AFP, and other factors that contribute to not only dropout on the wait list but posttransplant survival as well. The aim was to establish an equivalent Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELDEQ) score for HCC patients that would reduce the disparity in access to transplantation between HCC and non‐HCC patients. We determined risk groups for HCC patients with dropout hazards equivalent to those of non‐HCC patients, and we evaluated projections for HCC wait‐list dropout/transplantation probabilities on the basis of the MELDEQ prioritization scheme. Projections indicate that lower risk HCC patients (MELDEQ ≤ 18) would have dropout probabilities similar to those of non‐HCC patients in the same MELD score range, whereas dropout probabilities for higher risk HCC patients would actually be improved. The posttransplant survival of all HCC risk groups is lower than that of their non‐HCC counterparts, with 1‐year survival of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.70‐0.85) for MELDEQ scores ≥ 31. These results suggest that HCC patients with a combination of a low biochemical MELD score and a low AFP level (MELDEQ ≤ 15) would receive a marked advantage in comparison with patients with chemical MELD scores in a similar range and that a delay of 6 months for listing may be appropriate. In contrast, patients with MELDEQ scores > 15 would likely be adversely affected by a universal 6‐month delay in listing. Liver Transpl 21:612–622, 2015. © 2015 AASLD.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: MELDEQ : An alternative Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Description:
Multiple studies have demonstrated an advantage for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients under the current liver allocation system, such that the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) recently voted in support of a proposal to delay granting Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception points to all HCC patients for 6 months, independently of a candidate's native MELD score or alpha‐fetoprotein (AFP) level.
We obtained UNOS data on adult patients who were added to the wait list between January 22, 2005 and September 30, 2009, and we explored the relationship between HCC, MELD, AFP, and other factors that contribute to not only dropout on the wait list but posttransplant survival as well.
The aim was to establish an equivalent Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELDEQ) score for HCC patients that would reduce the disparity in access to transplantation between HCC and non‐HCC patients.
We determined risk groups for HCC patients with dropout hazards equivalent to those of non‐HCC patients, and we evaluated projections for HCC wait‐list dropout/transplantation probabilities on the basis of the MELDEQ prioritization scheme.
Projections indicate that lower risk HCC patients (MELDEQ ≤ 18) would have dropout probabilities similar to those of non‐HCC patients in the same MELD score range, whereas dropout probabilities for higher risk HCC patients would actually be improved.
The posttransplant survival of all HCC risk groups is lower than that of their non‐HCC counterparts, with 1‐year survival of 0.
77 (95% CI, 0.
70‐0.
85) for MELDEQ scores ≥ 31.
These results suggest that HCC patients with a combination of a low biochemical MELD score and a low AFP level (MELDEQ ≤ 15) would receive a marked advantage in comparison with patients with chemical MELD scores in a similar range and that a delay of 6 months for listing may be appropriate.
In contrast, patients with MELDEQ scores > 15 would likely be adversely affected by a universal 6‐month delay in listing.
Liver Transpl 21:612–622, 2015.
© 2015 AASLD.
Related Results
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
[RETRACTED] Bridport Health Reviews - Powerfully Detoxifies The Liver, Lose Liver Fat And Improve Gut Health! v1
[RETRACTED] Bridport Health Reviews - Powerfully Detoxifies The Liver, Lose Liver Fat And Improve Gut Health! v1
[RETRACTED]Product Name - Bridport Health Ingredients - Milk Thistle, Beetroot, Artichoke Extract & More. Category - Liver Support Supplement Main Benefits - Helps Protect The ...
[RETRACTED] Bridport Health Liver Support Does It Really Work v1
[RETRACTED] Bridport Health Liver Support Does It Really Work v1
[RETRACTED]Depiction • Where to Get Bottle Online –Click Here • Item Name -Bridport Health Liver • Aftereffects - No Major Side Effects • Classification - Health • Accessibility -O...
Evaluating the GALAD Score in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Evaluating the GALAD Score in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma
This paper aims to evaluate the GALAD score in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma. The paper conducted a retrospective study of 86 Hepatocellular Carcinoma patients who underwent ...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Impact of SARS CoV-2 /COVID-19 infection on the course of advanced chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma
Impact of SARS CoV-2 /COVID-19 infection on the course of advanced chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma
Abstract
Background
About 20% of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 develop COVID-19—the disease that has dominated health care in the last two years...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...

