Profiling tear film enzymes reveals major metabolic pathways involved in the homeostasis of the ocular surface

AbstractThe ocular surface (OS) enzymes are of great interest due to their potential for novel ocular drug development. We aimed first to profile and classify the enzymes of the OS to describe major biological processes and pathways that are involved in the maintenance of homeostasis. Second, we aimed to compare the enzymatic profiles between the two most common tear collection methods, capillary tubes (CT) and Schirmer strips (ScS). A comprehensive tear proteomic dataset was generated by pooling all enzymes identified from nine tear proteomic analyses of healthy subjects using mass spectrometry. In these studies, tear fluid was collected using CT (n = 4), ScS (n = 4) or both collection methods (n = 1). Classification and functional analysis of the enzymes was performed using a combination of bioinformatic tools. The dataset generated identified 1010 enzymes. The most representative classes were hydrolases (EC 3) and transferases (EC 2). Phosphotransferases, esterases and peptidases were the most represented subclasses. A large portion of the identified enzymes was common to both collection methods (n = 499). More enzymes were specifically detected in the ScS-extracted proteome. The major pathways in which the identified enzymes participate are related to the immune system and protein, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Metabolic processes for nucleosides, cellular amides, sugars and sulfur compounds constituted the most enriched biological processes. Knowledge of these molecules highly susceptible to pharmacological manipulation might help to predict the metabolism of ophthalmic medications and develop novel prodrug strategies as well as new drug delivery systems. Combining such extensive knowledge of the OS enzymes with new analytical approaches and techniques might create new prospects for understanding, predicting and manipulating the metabolism of ocular pharmaceuticals. Our study reports new, essential data on OS enzymes while also comparing the enzyme profiles obtained via the two most popular methods of tear collection, capillary tubes and Schirmer strips.