Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Conclusion
View through CrossRef
In 1918 Alsace was restored to French rule after almost fifty years of annexation into the German Empire. Its return was greeted with enthusiasm in Alsace and across France, but reintegration proved much more difficult than expected. This concluding chapter traces how the return of Alsace to France was shaped by the border, and suggests that consideration of the border as a driver of change encourages us to avoid a binary view of Alsace as either French or German or falling between two nations. Instead, a focus on the border encourages the consideration of Alsace as a dynamic force and draws our attention to the multiple languages that the population adopted to describe return. It underlines that reintegration proved a multi-cornered struggle and reveals that nations are not formed in isolation, but rather through interactions involving actors at the centre, at the periphery, and beyond the national boundaries.
Title: Conclusion
Description:
In 1918 Alsace was restored to French rule after almost fifty years of annexation into the German Empire.
Its return was greeted with enthusiasm in Alsace and across France, but reintegration proved much more difficult than expected.
This concluding chapter traces how the return of Alsace to France was shaped by the border, and suggests that consideration of the border as a driver of change encourages us to avoid a binary view of Alsace as either French or German or falling between two nations.
Instead, a focus on the border encourages the consideration of Alsace as a dynamic force and draws our attention to the multiple languages that the population adopted to describe return.
It underlines that reintegration proved a multi-cornered struggle and reveals that nations are not formed in isolation, but rather through interactions involving actors at the centre, at the periphery, and beyond the national boundaries.
Related Results
Conclusion
Conclusion
The Conclusion reiterates the main conceit of the book: that witnessing is rhetorically commonplace in modern public culture in a twofold sense—culturally commonplace and rhetorica...
Conclusion
Conclusion
The conclusion argues that the study of debates on urban change in Berlin and Cairo reveals a parallel periodization in the history of these two cities. During the second half of t...
Conclusion
Conclusion
The Conclusion summarizes the main tenets of the book, which, first, aims to propose a new comprehensive approach to the analysis of time in narrative that takes account both of th...
Conclusion (346–66)
Conclusion (346–66)
This chapter provides the Latin test and a literal translation into English of the conclusion to Juvenal’s tenth satire and a detailed critical appreciation of those lines (346-366...
Conclusion
Conclusion
The conclusion summarizes the main aims of the book. Even though shame can be a painful and damaging emotion, we would still not be better off without it. A continued liability to ...
Conclusion
Conclusion
The conclusion, first, critically assesses what Spinoza’s theory of the human mind, as reconstructed in this book, achieves with respect to an overall aim of advocating the view th...
Conclusion
Conclusion
The conclusion summarizes the findings of the book’s investigation of the hypothesis that epidemics which were mysterious and without known cures were the most likely to provoke ha...
Conclusion
Conclusion
The conclusion brings together the results from the book and shows that for Aristotle, the process of habituation is long and arduous, and that nature can hinder one’s chances of d...