Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Management of pouch dysfunction in a tertiary centre
View through CrossRef
AbstractAimRestorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis is the operation of choice for ulcerative colitis (UC) and some cases of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Although it offers improvement in quality of life and high patient satisfaction, pouch surgery is also associated with significant morbidity. The aim of this study was to describe the management of patients referred to a tertiary centre with pouch dysfunction.MethodAll patients referred with pouch dysfunction from other institutions between October 2006 and November 2014 were included in this retrospective study. Information regarding initial diagnosis before RPC, type of procedure, symptoms leading to referral, relation of the appearance of symptoms to the ileostomy closure, investigations, final diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up was reviewed.ResultsOne hundred and twenty‐one patients were included, having had RPC mostly for UC (94%), and with diverting ileostomy (83%). The most frequent reasons for referral were high frequency of defaecation in 83 (69%) patients, abdominal pain and incontinence in 45 (37%) each and perianal pain in 44 (36%). The principal investigations performed were pouchoscopy in 97 (80%) patients, examination under anaesthesia (EUA) in 62 (51%), pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 56 (46%) and contrast radiology of the pouch (pouchogram) in 45 (35%). The commonest diagnoses were pouchitis (primary and secondary) in 24 (21%) patients and anastomotic leakage in 26 (22%). After full investigation a cause for the symptoms could not be found in 24 (20%) patients, resulting in the diagnosis of exclusion of ‘irritable pouch syndrome’ or functional disorder. The treatments given were long‐term antibiotic therapy in 29 (25%) patients, ileostomy in 19 (16%), use of a Medena catheter to promote anal evacuation in 17 (15%) and dilatation of a stenosis under anaesthetic in 12 (10%). Six (5%) patients underwent major revision surgery of the pouch with a defunctioning ileostomy and the pouch was excised in another six (5%).ConclusionPatients with ileoanal pouch dysfunction often have multiple symptoms. This study shows that a wide range of investigations and treatment modalities need to be available to manage such patients, with a specialized approach in a multidisciplinary setting.
Title: Management of pouch dysfunction in a tertiary centre
Description:
AbstractAimRestorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis is the operation of choice for ulcerative colitis (UC) and some cases of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).
Although it offers improvement in quality of life and high patient satisfaction, pouch surgery is also associated with significant morbidity.
The aim of this study was to describe the management of patients referred to a tertiary centre with pouch dysfunction.
MethodAll patients referred with pouch dysfunction from other institutions between October 2006 and November 2014 were included in this retrospective study.
Information regarding initial diagnosis before RPC, type of procedure, symptoms leading to referral, relation of the appearance of symptoms to the ileostomy closure, investigations, final diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up was reviewed.
ResultsOne hundred and twenty‐one patients were included, having had RPC mostly for UC (94%), and with diverting ileostomy (83%).
The most frequent reasons for referral were high frequency of defaecation in 83 (69%) patients, abdominal pain and incontinence in 45 (37%) each and perianal pain in 44 (36%).
The principal investigations performed were pouchoscopy in 97 (80%) patients, examination under anaesthesia (EUA) in 62 (51%), pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 56 (46%) and contrast radiology of the pouch (pouchogram) in 45 (35%).
The commonest diagnoses were pouchitis (primary and secondary) in 24 (21%) patients and anastomotic leakage in 26 (22%).
After full investigation a cause for the symptoms could not be found in 24 (20%) patients, resulting in the diagnosis of exclusion of ‘irritable pouch syndrome’ or functional disorder.
The treatments given were long‐term antibiotic therapy in 29 (25%) patients, ileostomy in 19 (16%), use of a Medena catheter to promote anal evacuation in 17 (15%) and dilatation of a stenosis under anaesthetic in 12 (10%).
Six (5%) patients underwent major revision surgery of the pouch with a defunctioning ileostomy and the pouch was excised in another six (5%).
ConclusionPatients with ileoanal pouch dysfunction often have multiple symptoms.
This study shows that a wide range of investigations and treatment modalities need to be available to manage such patients, with a specialized approach in a multidisciplinary setting.
Related Results
P0192 Appropriate pouch volume associated with improved clinical outcomes and long-term quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: Results from China UC Pouch Center Union
P0192 Appropriate pouch volume associated with improved clinical outcomes and long-term quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: Results from China UC Pouch Center Union
Abstract
Background
The total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has been widely accepted as a radi...
What Is the Optimal Strategy for Pouch Salvage at Time of Redo Ileal-Pouch Anal Anastomosis? Pouch Repair with Reanastomosis vs Pouch Excision with Neopouch
What Is the Optimal Strategy for Pouch Salvage at Time of Redo Ileal-Pouch Anal Anastomosis? Pouch Repair with Reanastomosis vs Pouch Excision with Neopouch
BACKGROUND:
The long-term risk of pouch failure after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) range from 5% to 15%. Salvage surgery for fai...
Management of Pouch Neoplasia
Management of Pouch Neoplasia
BACKGROUND:
Pouch neoplasia occurs following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, with or without mucosectomy in ulcerative colitis and familiar adenomatous polyposis.
...
The Surgical Management of Ileal Pouch Strictures
The Surgical Management of Ileal Pouch Strictures
BACKGROUND:
Total proctocolectomy with IPAA reconstruction is the surgical approach of choice in ulcerative colitis, indeterminate colitis, familial adenomatous polypos...
Histopathological Evaluation of Pouch Neoplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
Histopathological Evaluation of Pouch Neoplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis
BACKGROUND:
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is often required for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis after colectomy. This procedure reduce...
Osoby niejednokrotnie przebywające w izbie wytrzeźwień
Osoby niejednokrotnie przebywające w izbie wytrzeźwień
In Poland we have at present in towns 29 detoxication centres with 1,226 beds; people found by the police in public places in a state of intoxication are more and more often taken ...
Review of current practice and outcomes following ileoanal pouch surgery: lessons learned from the Ileoanal Pouch Registry and the 2017 Ileoanal Pouch Report
Review of current practice and outcomes following ileoanal pouch surgery: lessons learned from the Ileoanal Pouch Registry and the 2017 Ileoanal Pouch Report
AbstractAimThe second Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) Ileoanal Pouch Registry (IPR) report was released in July 2017 following a first report in...
The Implications of Pouch Physiology
The Implications of Pouch Physiology
INTRODUCTION:
Patients undergoing an IPAA experience a completely different physiology of defecation than when they had a rectum. The new “normal” is poorly appreciated...

