Javascript must be enabled to continue!
St. Cyprian of Carthage and the College of Bishops
View through CrossRef
This book assesses episcopal cooperation as envisioned by the third-century bishop Cyprian of Carthage. It outlines and assesses the interactions between local bishops, provincial groups of bishops, and the worldwide college. Assessing these interactions sheds light on the relationship between Cyprian’s strong sense of local autonomy and the reality that each bishop was responsible to the world-wide college. Episcopal consensus was the sine qua non, for Cyprian, for a major issue of faith or practice to become one that defined membership in the college and, ultimately, the Church.
The book brings this assessment into a modern scholarly debate by concluding with an evaluation of the ecclesiology of the Orthodox scholar Nicolas Afanasiev and his critiques of Cyprian. Afanasiev lamented Cyprian as the father of universal ecclesiology and claimed that Cyprian’s college wielded authority above that of the local bishop. This book argues that Afanasiev fundamentally misconstrued Cyprian’s understanding of collegiality. It is shown that, for Cyprian, collegiality was the framework for the common ministry of the bishops and did not infringe on the sovereignty of the local bishop. Rather, it was the college’s collective duty to define the boundaries of acceptable Christian belief and practice.
Title: St. Cyprian of Carthage and the College of Bishops
Description:
This book assesses episcopal cooperation as envisioned by the third-century bishop Cyprian of Carthage.
It outlines and assesses the interactions between local bishops, provincial groups of bishops, and the worldwide college.
Assessing these interactions sheds light on the relationship between Cyprian’s strong sense of local autonomy and the reality that each bishop was responsible to the world-wide college.
Episcopal consensus was the sine qua non, for Cyprian, for a major issue of faith or practice to become one that defined membership in the college and, ultimately, the Church.
The book brings this assessment into a modern scholarly debate by concluding with an evaluation of the ecclesiology of the Orthodox scholar Nicolas Afanasiev and his critiques of Cyprian.
Afanasiev lamented Cyprian as the father of universal ecclesiology and claimed that Cyprian’s college wielded authority above that of the local bishop.
This book argues that Afanasiev fundamentally misconstrued Cyprian’s understanding of collegiality.
It is shown that, for Cyprian, collegiality was the framework for the common ministry of the bishops and did not infringe on the sovereignty of the local bishop.
Rather, it was the college’s collective duty to define the boundaries of acceptable Christian belief and practice.
Related Results
Bishops, 1550–1700
Bishops, 1550–1700
The church “thinks in centuries,” meaning that the role and significance of the episcopate remained the same in the period from 1550 to 1700 as it had in the time period covered in...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below:
RTD: Beyond Hospit...
Itinerant Anabaptist bishops from the Lower Rhine in the 1540s and 1550s
Itinerant Anabaptist bishops from the Lower Rhine in the 1540s and 1550s
This dissertation challenges the prevailing narrative in Anabaptist history and offers a fresh perspective on the regrouping of Anabaptists in the Habsburg Netherlands and adjacent...
Hannibal's hard ‘homecoming’ after 203 BCE
Hannibal's hard ‘homecoming’ after 203 BCE
Abstract“Hannibal's War” was what Carthage called the Second Punic War from 218–202 BCE because it was clear from the outset Carthaginian leadership was not fully participatory or ...
Death, Decay and Delight in Cyprian of Carthage
Death, Decay and Delight in Cyprian of Carthage
Abstract
A martyr’s suffering and death is glorious, says Cyprian of Carthage. No surprises there. But what about the ageing, suffering and death common to humanity? Old age is...
Bishops, 1400–1550
Bishops, 1400–1550
Within the hierarchy of the Church, bishops are regarded as successors to the apostles, ranking above priests and deacons. They are shepherds of the Christian flock, teaching the d...
Konferencja Biskupów w świetle motu proprio "Apostolos suos"
Konferencja Biskupów w świetle motu proprio "Apostolos suos"
The Motu proprio: Apostolos Sttos of pope John Paul II,dated 21 May 1998, is a continuation and intensification of the Second Vatican Council's teaching on the Bishops Conferences....
FATUR IRENAEUS DUM CYPRIANUS TACET: UNA CENSURA A CIPRIANO DE CARTAGO EN TIEMPOS DE LA REFORMA
FATUR IRENAEUS DUM CYPRIANUS TACET: UNA CENSURA A CIPRIANO DE CARTAGO EN TIEMPOS DE LA REFORMA
For centuries, Saint Irenaeus of Lyon did not have a collective prayer, while the fate of Saint Cyprian of Carthage was different from the dawn of Christianity. The relationship be...

