Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Pharmacokinetic interactions of efavirenz and voriconazole in healthy volunteers
View through CrossRef
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Efavirenz 400 mg q24 h reduces exposure to voriconazole 200 mg q12 h when the two drugs are co‐administered.• Furthermore, voriconazole increases the systemic exposure of efavirenz.• Co‐administration was therefore initially contraindicated. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • The doses of efavirenz and voriconazole can be adjusted to provide adequate exposure to both drugs when the two are co‐administered, without compromising safety.• Appropriate adjustment of doses for both drugs may thus represent an alternative to a mere contraindication.AIMSCo‐administration of standard‐dose voriconazole and efavirenz results in a substantial decrease in voriconazole levels, while concurrently increasing efavirenz levels. Hence, concomitant use of standard doses of these drugs was initially contraindicated. This study assessed different dose combinations of efavirenz and voriconazole, with the goal of attaining a dose combination that provides systemic exposures similar to standard‐dose monotherapy with each drug.METHODSThis was an open‐label, four‐treatment, multiple‐dose, fixed‐sequence study in 16 healthy males. Steady‐state pharmacokinetics were assessed following two test treatments (voriconazole 300 mg q12 h + efavirenz 300 mg q24 h and voriconazole 400 mg q12 h + efavirenz 300 mg q24 h) and compared with standard‐dose monotherapy (voriconazole 200 mg q12 h or efavirenz 600 mg q24 h).RESULTSDose adjustment to voriconazole 300 mg q12 h with efavirenz 300 mg q24 h decreased voriconazole area under the concentration–time curve (AUCτ) and maximum concentration (Cmax), with changes of −55% [90% confidence interval (CI) −62, −45] and −36% (90% CI −49, −21), respectively, when compared with monotherapy. Voriconazole 400 mg q12 h plus efavirenz 300 mg q24 h decreased voriconazole AUCτ (−7%; 90% CI −23, 13) and increased Cmax (23%; 90% CI −1, 53), while increasing efavirenz AUCτ (17%; 90% CI 6, 29) and not changing Cmax when compared with the respective monotherapy regimens. No serious adverse events were observed with voriconazole plus efavirenz.CONCLUSIONSWhen co‐administered, voriconazole dose should be increased to 400 mg q12 h and efavirenz dose decreased to 300 mg q24 h in order to provide systemic exposures similar to standard‐dose monotherapy.
Title: Pharmacokinetic interactions of efavirenz and voriconazole in healthy volunteers
Description:
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Efavirenz 400 mg q24 h reduces exposure to voriconazole 200 mg q12 h when the two drugs are co‐administered.
• Furthermore, voriconazole increases the systemic exposure of efavirenz.
• Co‐administration was therefore initially contraindicated.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • The doses of efavirenz and voriconazole can be adjusted to provide adequate exposure to both drugs when the two are co‐administered, without compromising safety.
• Appropriate adjustment of doses for both drugs may thus represent an alternative to a mere contraindication.
AIMSCo‐administration of standard‐dose voriconazole and efavirenz results in a substantial decrease in voriconazole levels, while concurrently increasing efavirenz levels.
Hence, concomitant use of standard doses of these drugs was initially contraindicated.
This study assessed different dose combinations of efavirenz and voriconazole, with the goal of attaining a dose combination that provides systemic exposures similar to standard‐dose monotherapy with each drug.
METHODSThis was an open‐label, four‐treatment, multiple‐dose, fixed‐sequence study in 16 healthy males.
Steady‐state pharmacokinetics were assessed following two test treatments (voriconazole 300 mg q12 h + efavirenz 300 mg q24 h and voriconazole 400 mg q12 h + efavirenz 300 mg q24 h) and compared with standard‐dose monotherapy (voriconazole 200 mg q12 h or efavirenz 600 mg q24 h).
RESULTSDose adjustment to voriconazole 300 mg q12 h with efavirenz 300 mg q24 h decreased voriconazole area under the concentration–time curve (AUCτ) and maximum concentration (Cmax), with changes of −55% [90% confidence interval (CI) −62, −45] and −36% (90% CI −49, −21), respectively, when compared with monotherapy.
Voriconazole 400 mg q12 h plus efavirenz 300 mg q24 h decreased voriconazole AUCτ (−7%; 90% CI −23, 13) and increased Cmax (23%; 90% CI −1, 53), while increasing efavirenz AUCτ (17%; 90% CI 6, 29) and not changing Cmax when compared with the respective monotherapy regimens.
No serious adverse events were observed with voriconazole plus efavirenz.
CONCLUSIONSWhen co‐administered, voriconazole dose should be increased to 400 mg q12 h and efavirenz dose decreased to 300 mg q24 h in order to provide systemic exposures similar to standard‐dose monotherapy.
Related Results
Effects of inflammation on voriconazole metabolism and peripheral blood trough concentration
Effects of inflammation on voriconazole metabolism and peripheral blood trough concentration
Abstract
Background
The inner association of inflammation with voriconazole (VCZ) metabolism has not been fully investigated. This study further discussed the relationship...
Efavirenz-Induced Skin Eruption and Successful Desensitization
Efavirenz-Induced Skin Eruption and Successful Desensitization
OBJECTIVE: To report a patient with efavirenz-induced hypersensitivity syndrome reaction who was successfully desensitized to efavirenz. CASE SUMMARY: A 37-year-old HIV-positive wh...
Abstract 2656: Ethical considerations in evaluating targeted anticancer drug candidates in healthy volunteers – safety and risk assessments
Abstract 2656: Ethical considerations in evaluating targeted anticancer drug candidates in healthy volunteers – safety and risk assessments
Abstract
Background: Biopharmaceutical and clinical pharmacology studies are typically conducted in healthy volunteers with few exceptions, such as for anti-cancer d...
Cytochrome 2B6 polymorphism and efavirenz‐induced central nervous system symptoms : a substudy of the ANRS ALIZE trial
Cytochrome 2B6 polymorphism and efavirenz‐induced central nervous system symptoms : a substudy of the ANRS ALIZE trial
ObjectivesSingle nucleotide polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2B6 gene have been associated with high interindividual variation in efavirenz pharmacokinetics. However, cli...
Inhibitory effects of CYP3A4 inhibitors voriconazole, itraconazole, and fluconazole on the pharmacokinetic profiles of ceritinib in rats by HPLC-MS/MS
Inhibitory effects of CYP3A4 inhibitors voriconazole, itraconazole, and fluconazole on the pharmacokinetic profiles of ceritinib in rats by HPLC-MS/MS
Introduction: Ceritinib is a second-line drug used to treat patients
with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have acquired resistance to
crizotinib. Triazole antifungals are th...
Pharmacogenetic Analysis of Voriconazole Treatment in Children
Pharmacogenetic Analysis of Voriconazole Treatment in Children
Voriconazole is among the first-line antifungal drugs to treat invasive fungal infections in children and known for its pronounced inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetic variab...
Peningkatan Disolusi dan Stabilitas Efavirenz Menggunakan Beberapa Metode Dispersi Padat
Peningkatan Disolusi dan Stabilitas Efavirenz Menggunakan Beberapa Metode Dispersi Padat
Efavirenz merupakan obat terapi AIDS yang memiliki beberapa bentuk polimorf. Beberapa bentuk polimorf akan memiliki perbedaan dalam disolusi dan stabiltasnya. Dispersi padat merupa...
Involvement Of Volunteers In Agricultural Education Programs In New Mexico
Involvement Of Volunteers In Agricultural Education Programs In New Mexico
Enrollments in secondary agricultural education programs in New Mexico have steadily increased over the past several years placing more demands on the programs and their resources....


