Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Deepstar's Program Related to FPSO's

View through CrossRef
Abstract Since Deep Star's inception in 1992, the Program has progressed from a $500,000 paper study of the feasibility of extended reach subsea tiebacks to focus on developing generic deepwater technology. DeepStar Phase IV began in 1998 and now has a budget of approximately $13MM for its' work studies. As with Phase III, Phase IV emphasizes testing with a goal of expediting the deployment of technology. DeepStar Committees focus on Regulatory, Flow Assurance, Subsea Equipment, Vessels, Mooring, Risers, Drilling & Completions, Reservoir Engineering, and MetOcean (Gulf of Mexico Inflow Measurement) issues. The continued cooperative research efforts between DeepStar, Industry, and Government Agencies reap many benefits. Illustrative examples of DeepStar technology include: novel pigging and instrumentation, flow assurance instrumentation, prediction of hydrate plug movement, subsea intervention, dynamic steel tube umbilicals, composite drilling risers, and methods to alleviate shallow water flows. Nearing completion of Phase IV on December 31, 1999, DeepStar has initiated work on a field-scale hydrate and paraffin flow assurance test facility at a DOE site in Casper, Wyoming. Deepstar has deployed an electrically heated pipeline system in an ocean environment, polyester mooring in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) and kicked off a project to measure the inflow through the Yucatan (GOM) Straight. Introduction DeepStar's Regulatory Subcommittee was formed in Phase II of the DeepStar Program in 1992. As an integral part of the network of interlocking subcommittees, the committee has remained an active part of the DeepStar Program. The Regulatory Subcommittee has retained its original organizational structure and objectives and maintained a consistent group of operator and regulator representatives since Phase II. The Chairman and Co-Chairman and the regulator representatives for the Committee have served since its inception and provide the group consistency in carrying out teamwork. Table I identifies the committee make-up during the various phases of the DeepStar Program and Figure I depicts the reporting relationship of the committees in Phase IV. More detailed information on the Deepstar Program can be accessed in OTC Paper 7264 "The Deepstar Project." The objective of the committee has always centered on the exchange of technical information between the working technical groups in DeepStar and the regulatory representatives of the Mineral Management Service (MMS) and the United States Coast Guard (USCG). The objective being the full review of the relevant issues involved in the deployment of new tools or processes in the development of fields in the Gulf of Mexico. In the majority of cases, the review process is triggered by work carried out in the technical groups and presented to the Regulatory Group to expose the issues to the Regulatory Committee in a technical session prior to a request for permit. An exception to the normal process was the work carried out on the Deepwater Operations Plan, which was brought up in the Regulatory Committee and worked through several technical groups in the program. Figure II denotes the typical cycle of the jointly developed DWOP. The key elements of the work processes are the high level of technical review that is provided for the group. Discussions are then held with operator personnel, regulatory representatives and by contractors that normally attend the meetings.
Title: Deepstar's Program Related to FPSO's
Description:
Abstract Since Deep Star's inception in 1992, the Program has progressed from a $500,000 paper study of the feasibility of extended reach subsea tiebacks to focus on developing generic deepwater technology.
DeepStar Phase IV began in 1998 and now has a budget of approximately $13MM for its' work studies.
As with Phase III, Phase IV emphasizes testing with a goal of expediting the deployment of technology.
DeepStar Committees focus on Regulatory, Flow Assurance, Subsea Equipment, Vessels, Mooring, Risers, Drilling & Completions, Reservoir Engineering, and MetOcean (Gulf of Mexico Inflow Measurement) issues.
The continued cooperative research efforts between DeepStar, Industry, and Government Agencies reap many benefits.
Illustrative examples of DeepStar technology include: novel pigging and instrumentation, flow assurance instrumentation, prediction of hydrate plug movement, subsea intervention, dynamic steel tube umbilicals, composite drilling risers, and methods to alleviate shallow water flows.
Nearing completion of Phase IV on December 31, 1999, DeepStar has initiated work on a field-scale hydrate and paraffin flow assurance test facility at a DOE site in Casper, Wyoming.
Deepstar has deployed an electrically heated pipeline system in an ocean environment, polyester mooring in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) and kicked off a project to measure the inflow through the Yucatan (GOM) Straight.
Introduction DeepStar's Regulatory Subcommittee was formed in Phase II of the DeepStar Program in 1992.
As an integral part of the network of interlocking subcommittees, the committee has remained an active part of the DeepStar Program.
The Regulatory Subcommittee has retained its original organizational structure and objectives and maintained a consistent group of operator and regulator representatives since Phase II.
The Chairman and Co-Chairman and the regulator representatives for the Committee have served since its inception and provide the group consistency in carrying out teamwork.
Table I identifies the committee make-up during the various phases of the DeepStar Program and Figure I depicts the reporting relationship of the committees in Phase IV.
More detailed information on the Deepstar Program can be accessed in OTC Paper 7264 "The Deepstar Project.
" The objective of the committee has always centered on the exchange of technical information between the working technical groups in DeepStar and the regulatory representatives of the Mineral Management Service (MMS) and the United States Coast Guard (USCG).
The objective being the full review of the relevant issues involved in the deployment of new tools or processes in the development of fields in the Gulf of Mexico.
In the majority of cases, the review process is triggered by work carried out in the technical groups and presented to the Regulatory Group to expose the issues to the Regulatory Committee in a technical session prior to a request for permit.
An exception to the normal process was the work carried out on the Deepwater Operations Plan, which was brought up in the Regulatory Committee and worked through several technical groups in the program.
Figure II denotes the typical cycle of the jointly developed DWOP.
The key elements of the work processes are the high level of technical review that is provided for the group.
Discussions are then held with operator personnel, regulatory representatives and by contractors that normally attend the meetings.

Related Results

Deepstar Study on Predicting FPSO Responses - Model Tests VS Numerical Analysis
Deepstar Study on Predicting FPSO Responses - Model Tests VS Numerical Analysis
1. ABSTRACT This paper presents the correlation study of FPSO model tests and numerical analyses sponsored by the DeepStar program. The numerical analysis results...
FPSO EIS Results and Record of Decision
FPSO EIS Results and Record of Decision
Abstract The United States Department of the Interior (DOI), Minerals Management Service (MMS) prepared an environmental impact statement (EIS)1 to evaluate poten...
FPSO's Today: What is the Optimum Concept?
FPSO's Today: What is the Optimum Concept?
ABSTRACT FPSO technology over the past years has rapidly evolved from tanker based units with classical mooring systems to purpose-shaped new built vessels equipp...
The Challenges and Opportunities of FPSO Relocations
The Challenges and Opportunities of FPSO Relocations
Abstract The first FPSO relocation project was completed 18 years ago (SBM's FPSO II), and since that time there has been a steady rise in the number and complexi...
The Sanha LPG FPSO
The Sanha LPG FPSO
Abstract The FPSO industry will soon have the first LPG FPSO in operation. The SANHA LPG FPSO is the first gas related FPSO. With the installation of the LPG FPSO...
Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading Systems in the Gulf of Mexico OCS: A Regulatory Perspective
Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading Systems in the Gulf of Mexico OCS: A Regulatory Perspective
Abstract Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading (FPSO) systems represent an untested technology in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico (GOM) Outer Continental Shelf. Th...
FPSO Environmental Impact Statement: What is Happening?
FPSO Environmental Impact Statement: What is Happening?
Abstract This paper explores the regulatory issues around the use offloating production, storage, and offloading systems (FPSOs) and shuttle tankers in the Gulf o...

Back to Top