Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Locomotor disability: Meaning, causes and effects of interventions

View through CrossRef
This paper provides a synopsis of a long-term programme of MRC-funded work on locomotor disability in older people. Specifically it describes the meaning and experience of disability, examines the risk factors for disability and systematically reviews the evidence from randomized trials of complex interventions for disability. We undertook a national prospective study of a representative sample of 999 people aged 65 years or more plus in-depth interviews with a small subsample and a selected sample obtained from hospital sources. Secondary analysis of several large prospective studies was carried out and a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials of the effects of complex interventions for disability. Very few participants subscribed to the constructs of longstanding illness, disability or infirmity that surveys often use. A wide range of social and psychological factors, independently of chronic diseases, were strongly associated with disability. People with greater functional reserve capacity and those with greater self-efficacy were generally less likely to suffer from catastrophic decline in ability and had better quality of life in the face of disability. In reviewing 89 trials (over 97,000 participants) of complex interventions for disability, evidence of benefits was found although no relationship with intensity of intervention was apparent. Our findings on the meaning and experience of disability suggest the need for modifications to routinely used survey questions and for different ways of understanding the need for and receipt of care among older people with disabilities. The diverse risk factors for disability suggest that novel approaches across social, psychological as well as more traditional rehabilitation and behavioural risk factor modification would be worth exploring. Complex interventions appeared to help older people to live independently and limit functional decline irrespective of age and health status.
Title: Locomotor disability: Meaning, causes and effects of interventions
Description:
This paper provides a synopsis of a long-term programme of MRC-funded work on locomotor disability in older people.
Specifically it describes the meaning and experience of disability, examines the risk factors for disability and systematically reviews the evidence from randomized trials of complex interventions for disability.
We undertook a national prospective study of a representative sample of 999 people aged 65 years or more plus in-depth interviews with a small subsample and a selected sample obtained from hospital sources.
Secondary analysis of several large prospective studies was carried out and a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials of the effects of complex interventions for disability.
Very few participants subscribed to the constructs of longstanding illness, disability or infirmity that surveys often use.
A wide range of social and psychological factors, independently of chronic diseases, were strongly associated with disability.
People with greater functional reserve capacity and those with greater self-efficacy were generally less likely to suffer from catastrophic decline in ability and had better quality of life in the face of disability.
In reviewing 89 trials (over 97,000 participants) of complex interventions for disability, evidence of benefits was found although no relationship with intensity of intervention was apparent.
Our findings on the meaning and experience of disability suggest the need for modifications to routinely used survey questions and for different ways of understanding the need for and receipt of care among older people with disabilities.
The diverse risk factors for disability suggest that novel approaches across social, psychological as well as more traditional rehabilitation and behavioural risk factor modification would be worth exploring.
Complex interventions appeared to help older people to live independently and limit functional decline irrespective of age and health status.

Related Results

Disability Studies
Disability Studies
This article brings together key texts and theorists from disability studies, which is a growing and vibrant inter/multidisciplinary field. It is an area of inquiry that has been e...
Unveiling the Disability A Study of Social Discrimination in Contemporary American Memoires
Unveiling the Disability A Study of Social Discrimination in Contemporary American Memoires
The study aims to explore social discrimination as experienced by disabled persons and depicted in contemporary American memoirs by the disabled person. It investigates the effects...
Where Is Disability in Global Public Health?
Where Is Disability in Global Public Health?
Accounting for about 15% of the world’s population, persons with disabilities constitute a critical population. Despite a substantial knowledge base in disability and public health...
Food Studies and Disability Justice
Food Studies and Disability Justice
Robust scholarship at the intersection of disability studies and food studies is rare. Disability scholars who study and write about experiences of disabled people in relation to f...
Locomotion Improves Children's Spatial Search: A Meta-Analytic Review
Locomotion Improves Children's Spatial Search: A Meta-Analytic Review
This meta-analysis quantitatively summarized the developmental influence and the effects of locomotor experience as well as the benefits of locomotor practice, locomotor assistance...
The functional disability of the elderly in tambon Krabi-noi Muang district, Krabi province, Thailand
The functional disability of the elderly in tambon Krabi-noi Muang district, Krabi province, Thailand
This research investigates the functional disability of the elderly residents of Tambon Krabi-noi, Muang district, Krabi province in 2005 and aims to explore (1) the prevalence of ...

Back to Top