Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Philosophy of the Future and the Posthuman: Implications and Philosophical Analysis
View through CrossRef
The relevance of the study arises from philosophical and ideological contradictions regarding human identity, which are intensifying in the scientific worldview and socio-cultural paradigm. The purpose of the article is to reveal the philosophical understanding of existential, anthropological, and axiological transformations of humans in the future. The research task is to highlight prospects for human dimensionality in the near future and global strategies of human existence within an uncertain future model. The analysis is based on reviewing, comparing, and systematising 52 scientific works covering anthropological topics within the context of philosophy, science, and civilisation. The study results indicate the absence of a unified posthuman model due to the uncertainty of human positioning in the future. The modern scientific picture offers only fragmented changes to the traditional idea of humans (biological, social, spiritual). In contrast, philosophy remains a key tool for interpreting developmental vectors of anthropological strategies that ensure the integrity of future humanity. The study’s specificity lies in balancing dichotomous and synergistic principles of philosophical and anthropological dimensions. On one hand, the posthuman contrasts with modern humans from scientific, natural, and socio-cultural perspectives. On the other hand, the formation of the posthuman is driven by processes where scientific, natural, and socio-cultural dimensions influence human transformation. The research prospects involve applying a synergistic model—potentially a methodological foundation for future philosophy—that emphasises pluralistic, interdisciplinary, and multicultural approaches to studying the posthuman. The study highlights the variability in scientific and philosophical discourse regarding the posthuman, leading to turbulence in philosophical and anthropological research. In this context, it is essential to preserve value-existential and functional-practical constants of the world order, correlating the philosophical methodology of the future (posthumanism and transhumanism) with characteristics of the human of the future.
Title: Philosophy of the Future and the Posthuman: Implications and Philosophical Analysis
Description:
The relevance of the study arises from philosophical and ideological contradictions regarding human identity, which are intensifying in the scientific worldview and socio-cultural paradigm.
The purpose of the article is to reveal the philosophical understanding of existential, anthropological, and axiological transformations of humans in the future.
The research task is to highlight prospects for human dimensionality in the near future and global strategies of human existence within an uncertain future model.
The analysis is based on reviewing, comparing, and systematising 52 scientific works covering anthropological topics within the context of philosophy, science, and civilisation.
The study results indicate the absence of a unified posthuman model due to the uncertainty of human positioning in the future.
The modern scientific picture offers only fragmented changes to the traditional idea of humans (biological, social, spiritual).
In contrast, philosophy remains a key tool for interpreting developmental vectors of anthropological strategies that ensure the integrity of future humanity.
The study’s specificity lies in balancing dichotomous and synergistic principles of philosophical and anthropological dimensions.
On one hand, the posthuman contrasts with modern humans from scientific, natural, and socio-cultural perspectives.
On the other hand, the formation of the posthuman is driven by processes where scientific, natural, and socio-cultural dimensions influence human transformation.
The research prospects involve applying a synergistic model—potentially a methodological foundation for future philosophy—that emphasises pluralistic, interdisciplinary, and multicultural approaches to studying the posthuman.
The study highlights the variability in scientific and philosophical discourse regarding the posthuman, leading to turbulence in philosophical and anthropological research.
In this context, it is essential to preserve value-existential and functional-practical constants of the world order, correlating the philosophical methodology of the future (posthumanism and transhumanism) with characteristics of the human of the future.
Related Results
What is Analytic Philosophy
What is Analytic Philosophy
Special Issue: What is Analytic PhilosophyReferencesHaaparantaG. P. Baker and P. M. S. Hacker. Frege: Logical Excavations. Oxford, Blackwell, 1984.M. Dummett. The Interpretation of...
Escaping the Shadow
Escaping the Shadow
Photo by Karl Raymund Catabas on Unsplash
The interests of patients at most levels of policymaking are represented by a disconnected patchwork of groups … “After Buddha was dead, ...
Artificial Intelligence and Engineering: Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives in the New Era
Artificial Intelligence and Engineering: Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives in the New Era
In this work, a general definition, meaning, and importance of engineering are expressed generally, and the main branches of engineering are briefly discussed. The concept of techn...
Posthuman Body in Nights at the Circus by Angela Carter
Posthuman Body in Nights at the Circus by Angela Carter
This study aims to analyse the posthuman body in Nights at the Circus (1984) by Angela Carter from the perspective of posthuman feminism. Posthuman feminism explores the humanist i...
Natural philosophy, medieval
Natural philosophy, medieval
Medieval Latin natural philosophy falls into two main periods, before the rise of the universities (mainly in the twelfth century, when works were produced in connection with arist...
Empirical and Philosophical Reflections on Trust
Empirical and Philosophical Reflections on Trust
<p>A dominant claim in the philosophical literature on trust is that we should stop thinking in terms of group trustworthiness or appropriate trust in groups. In this paper, ...
Empirical and Philosophical Reflections on Trust
Empirical and Philosophical Reflections on Trust
<p>A dominant claim in the philosophical literature on trust is that we should stop thinking in terms of group trustworthiness or appropriate trust in groups. In this paper, ...
Sartre in Space: Rethinking Architecture & Rebuilding Philosophy
Sartre in Space: Rethinking Architecture & Rebuilding Philosophy
<p>This thesis considers spatial and architectural language used in philosophical text to determine the value of a cross-disciplinary relationship between architecture and ph...

