Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The formation of personhood in the educational theories of Philipp Abraham Kohnstamm and Martinus Jan Langeveld

View through CrossRef
This study shows how the educational theory of Kohnstamm is based on his elaboration of the philosophy of personalism. It follows that personhood formation should be understood as the becoming of a personality. This implies an educational process that, in addition to developing uniqueness and individuality, is also aimed at learning to make moral choices. From this study it ensues that personhood formation can likewise be understood as educating a child to listen to the voice of its conscience. In Kohnstamm’s understanding, this can be regarded as the voice of God. The family is the primary place of personhood formation in his theory, yet he also stressed that personhood formation is mainly self-formation. It is a process of discovering one’s own unique convictions. Another important idea in the process of personhood formation is learning to bear responsibility. As a child grows, so does this responsibility. Again, parents play the most important role in this process, but the contact between a child and a teacher or youth leader is also personhood-forming. Didactic forms of education can also contribute to this, as can subjects such as visual education, literature, drama and movement education. It is important for the educational modality to ensure that a child is formed into an individual in community. In the theory of Langeveld, personhood formation means becoming a ‘self-responsible self-determining personality’. Hereby Langeveld envisaged an education that allows for the child (the person) to discover who they are and understand why they make certain choices (self-determination). This comprises a process of formation in which both freedom and bearing responsibility increase. The role of the child as co-determinant subject in the process of personhood formation is stressed in Langeveld’s theory. An important (second) aim of Langeveld’s theory is that personhood formation also means the child is not only formed into an autonomous individual, but also learns to bear responsibility for the community. Further, this study evidences that, also in Langeveld’s theory, personhood formation can be equated with conscience formation. This comprises a process of learning to listen to the voice of one’s inner moral authority. The forming would take place primarily as part of the parent-child relationship. Next, this dissertation presents five insights that follow from this historical-educational research while contributing to contemporary discussions on personhood formation.
Title: The formation of personhood in the educational theories of Philipp Abraham Kohnstamm and Martinus Jan Langeveld
Description:
This study shows how the educational theory of Kohnstamm is based on his elaboration of the philosophy of personalism.
It follows that personhood formation should be understood as the becoming of a personality.
This implies an educational process that, in addition to developing uniqueness and individuality, is also aimed at learning to make moral choices.
From this study it ensues that personhood formation can likewise be understood as educating a child to listen to the voice of its conscience.
In Kohnstamm’s understanding, this can be regarded as the voice of God.
The family is the primary place of personhood formation in his theory, yet he also stressed that personhood formation is mainly self-formation.
It is a process of discovering one’s own unique convictions.
Another important idea in the process of personhood formation is learning to bear responsibility.
As a child grows, so does this responsibility.
Again, parents play the most important role in this process, but the contact between a child and a teacher or youth leader is also personhood-forming.
Didactic forms of education can also contribute to this, as can subjects such as visual education, literature, drama and movement education.
It is important for the educational modality to ensure that a child is formed into an individual in community.
In the theory of Langeveld, personhood formation means becoming a ‘self-responsible self-determining personality’.
Hereby Langeveld envisaged an education that allows for the child (the person) to discover who they are and understand why they make certain choices (self-determination).
This comprises a process of formation in which both freedom and bearing responsibility increase.
The role of the child as co-determinant subject in the process of personhood formation is stressed in Langeveld’s theory.
An important (second) aim of Langeveld’s theory is that personhood formation also means the child is not only formed into an autonomous individual, but also learns to bear responsibility for the community.
Further, this study evidences that, also in Langeveld’s theory, personhood formation can be equated with conscience formation.
This comprises a process of learning to listen to the voice of one’s inner moral authority.
The forming would take place primarily as part of the parent-child relationship.
Next, this dissertation presents five insights that follow from this historical-educational research while contributing to contemporary discussions on personhood formation.

Related Results

Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
Personhood, dementia policy and the Irish National Dementia Strategy
Personhood, dementia policy and the Irish National Dementia Strategy
Personhood and its realisation in person-centred care is part of the narrative, if not always the reality, of care for people with dementia. This paper examines how personhood is c...
Degrees of AI Personhood
Degrees of AI Personhood
Abstract Taking as premise artificial intelligence (AI) systems’ propensity to straddle the border between objects and subjects, which in some cases warrants thei...
Taking Personhood Seriously
Taking Personhood Seriously
This Article takes the recent Twitter merger litigation, along with other high-profile legal developments, as an opportunity to re-examine one of the most important, and misunderst...
Do We Need to Discuss AI Personhood? An Analysis Between Technological Logic and A Critique of Category Mistakes
Do We Need to Discuss AI Personhood? An Analysis Between Technological Logic and A Critique of Category Mistakes
The existing scholarly discussion regarding "AI Personhood" is essentially a Pseudo-Problem stemming from a category mistake. First, from a technological ontological perspective, A...
ENVIRONMENTAL PERSONHOOD REIMAGINED: A CONCISE PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW
ENVIRONMENTAL PERSONHOOD REIMAGINED: A CONCISE PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW
Abstract This paper is built upon one question: can the natural world be recognised as a ‘member’ of a legal community? By exploring the nature of legal personhood, this paper rev...
Personhood as Particularity: John Zizioulas, Colin Gunton, and the Trinitarian Theology of Personhood
Personhood as Particularity: John Zizioulas, Colin Gunton, and the Trinitarian Theology of Personhood
AbstractOne of the dimensions of this paper’s twofold purpose is to examine the validity of John Zizioulas’ definition of personhood as communion, and whether or not this produces ...
Personhood within the context of sedation at the end of life in Singapore
Personhood within the context of sedation at the end of life in Singapore
The concept of personhood is critical to the provision of holistic, patient-centred, palliative care yet no common definition of this term exists. Some characterise personhood by t...

Back to Top