Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The spatiotemporal link of temporal expectations: contextual temporal expectation is independent of spatial attention

View through CrossRef
Abstract Temporal expectation is the ability to construct predictions regarding the timing of events, based on previously-experienced temporal regularities of different types. For example, cue-based expectations are constructed when a cue validly indicates when a target is expected to occur. However, in the absence of such cues, expectations can be constructed based on contextual temporal information, including the event’s hazard-rate function – its moment-by-moment conditional probability that changes over time; and prior experiences, which provide probabilistic information regarding the event’s predicted timing (sequential effects). It was previously suggested that cue-based temporal expectation is exerted via synchronization of spatially-specific neural activity at a target's predictable time, within receptive fields corresponding to the target’s expected location. Here, we tested if the same theoretical model holds for contextual temporal effects. Participants (n = 40) performed a speeded spatial-cueing detection task, with two-thirds valid spatial cues. The target’s hazard-rate function was modulated by varying the foreperiod – the interval between the spatial cue and the target - among trials, and was manipulated between groups by changing the interval distribution. Reaction times were analyzed using both frequentist and Bayesian generalized linear mixed models, accounting for hazard and sequential effects. Results showed that the effects of contextual temporal structures on reaction times were independent of spatial attention. This suggests that the spatiotemporal mechanisms, thought to account for cue-based expectation, cannot explain other sources of temporal expectations. We conclude that expectations based on contextual structures have different characteristics than cue-based temporal expectation, suggesting reliance on distinct neural mechanisms. Significance statement Temporal expectation is the ability to predict an event onset based on temporal regularities. A neurophysiological model suggested that temporal expectation relies on the synchronization of spatially-specific neurons whose receptive fields represent the attended location. This model predicts that temporal expectation would be evident solely within the locus of spatial attention. Existing evidence supported this model for expectation based on associations between a temporal cue and a target, but here we show that it cannot account for another source of temporal expectation – expectation that is based on contextual information, i.e. hazard-rate and recent priors. These findings reveal the existence of different predictive mechanisms for cued and contextual temporal predictions, with the former depending on spatial attention and the latter non-spatially-specific.
Title: The spatiotemporal link of temporal expectations: contextual temporal expectation is independent of spatial attention
Description:
Abstract Temporal expectation is the ability to construct predictions regarding the timing of events, based on previously-experienced temporal regularities of different types.
For example, cue-based expectations are constructed when a cue validly indicates when a target is expected to occur.
However, in the absence of such cues, expectations can be constructed based on contextual temporal information, including the event’s hazard-rate function – its moment-by-moment conditional probability that changes over time; and prior experiences, which provide probabilistic information regarding the event’s predicted timing (sequential effects).
It was previously suggested that cue-based temporal expectation is exerted via synchronization of spatially-specific neural activity at a target's predictable time, within receptive fields corresponding to the target’s expected location.
Here, we tested if the same theoretical model holds for contextual temporal effects.
Participants (n = 40) performed a speeded spatial-cueing detection task, with two-thirds valid spatial cues.
The target’s hazard-rate function was modulated by varying the foreperiod – the interval between the spatial cue and the target - among trials, and was manipulated between groups by changing the interval distribution.
Reaction times were analyzed using both frequentist and Bayesian generalized linear mixed models, accounting for hazard and sequential effects.
Results showed that the effects of contextual temporal structures on reaction times were independent of spatial attention.
This suggests that the spatiotemporal mechanisms, thought to account for cue-based expectation, cannot explain other sources of temporal expectations.
We conclude that expectations based on contextual structures have different characteristics than cue-based temporal expectation, suggesting reliance on distinct neural mechanisms.
Significance statement Temporal expectation is the ability to predict an event onset based on temporal regularities.
A neurophysiological model suggested that temporal expectation relies on the synchronization of spatially-specific neurons whose receptive fields represent the attended location.
This model predicts that temporal expectation would be evident solely within the locus of spatial attention.
Existing evidence supported this model for expectation based on associations between a temporal cue and a target, but here we show that it cannot account for another source of temporal expectation – expectation that is based on contextual information, i.
e.
hazard-rate and recent priors.
These findings reveal the existence of different predictive mechanisms for cued and contextual temporal predictions, with the former depending on spatial attention and the latter non-spatially-specific.

Related Results

/r/philosophy 2016-2017 AMA Series Recap + Survey!
/r/philosophy 2016-2017 AMA Series Recap + Survey!
This past academic year the moderators of /r/philosophy organised an ongoing AMA series with 18 different philosophers working on a variety of different topics, from metaphysics to...
Characterizing spatiotemporal population receptive fields in human visual cortex with fMRI
Characterizing spatiotemporal population receptive fields in human visual cortex with fMRI
AbstractThe use of fMRI and computational modeling has advanced understanding of spatial characteristics of population receptive fields (pRFs) in human visual cortex. However, we k...
Retraction notice to: The special issue of filomat no. 34:15 (2020)
Retraction notice to: The special issue of filomat no. 34:15 (2020)
Retraction of the special issue: FILOMAT 34:15 (2020) The First International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Intelligent Control (ICARIC 2018). <br><br><font...
Advances in an Event-Based Spatiotemporal Data Modeling
Advances in an Event-Based Spatiotemporal Data Modeling
Spatiotemporal data are vitally important for the national economy and defense modernization since it is not only an important component of human society and geographical informati...
Spatiotemporal Adaptive Attention Graph Convolution Network for city-level Air Quality Prediction
Spatiotemporal Adaptive Attention Graph Convolution Network for city-level Air Quality Prediction
Abstract Air pollution is the leading cause of human diseases. Accurate air quality predictions are critical to human health. However, it is difficult to extract spatiotemp...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Temporal expectation modulates cortical dynamics of sensory memory
Temporal expectation modulates cortical dynamics of sensory memory
AbstractIncreased memory load is often signified by enhanced neural oscillatory power in the alpha range (8–13 Hz), taken to reflect inhibition of task-irrelevant brain regions. Th...
Role of the Frontal Lobes in the Propagation of Mesial Temporal Lobe Seizures
Role of the Frontal Lobes in the Propagation of Mesial Temporal Lobe Seizures
Summary: The depth ictal electroencephalographic (EEG) propagation sequence accompanying 78 complex partial seizures of mesial temporal origin was reviewed in 24 patients (15 from...

Back to Top