Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Against Necessitarianism
View through CrossRef
The laws of nature are at most physically necessary, and they are not metaphysically necessary. Dispositional Essentialists claim that if natural laws derive from powers, then the laws of nature are metaphysically necessary. But the idea that properties have dispositional essences does not entail necessitarianism for several reasons. There might be no laws of nature. The laws might have exceptions, or be probabilistic. There are non-dispositional properties that could figure in contingent laws. The world might have contained different properties. Finally, even if a property has a dispositional essence, it might have had a slightly different causal profile. Furthermore, the Necessitarian’s views are less revisionary than they initially seem.
Title: Against Necessitarianism
Description:
The laws of nature are at most physically necessary, and they are not metaphysically necessary.
Dispositional Essentialists claim that if natural laws derive from powers, then the laws of nature are metaphysically necessary.
But the idea that properties have dispositional essences does not entail necessitarianism for several reasons.
There might be no laws of nature.
The laws might have exceptions, or be probabilistic.
There are non-dispositional properties that could figure in contingent laws.
The world might have contained different properties.
Finally, even if a property has a dispositional essence, it might have had a slightly different causal profile.
Furthermore, the Necessitarian’s views are less revisionary than they initially seem.
Related Results
Building II
Building II
This chapter argues for a particular way of characterizing what it takes for a relation to count as a building relation. All building relations are a) asymmetric and irreflexive, b...
Spinoza’s Metaphysics of Modality
Spinoza’s Metaphysics of Modality
Chapter four argues that ignoring a fundamental explanatory question has led interpreters to misunderstand Spinoza’s views on necessity, contingency, possibility, and impossibility...
From “Epicurean” Physics to Ethics
From “Epicurean” Physics to Ethics
This chapter discusses Baxter’s theory of natural law and his polemics against Thomas Hobbes and Benedict de Spinoza on ethical matters. Baxter’s natural law theory drew on Francis...