A Potential Specificity Code for B. subtilis SsbA and SsbB Quaternary Structures

Bacterial single‐stranded (ss) DNA‐binding proteins (SSBs) bind and protect ssDNA intermediates formed during genome maintenance reactions and help to recruit DNA replication and repair proteins to their sites of action through interactions mediated by their C‐terminal tails. While SSB has been studied extensively in E. coli , much less is known about the paralogous SSBs, SsbA and SsbB, that are found in many gram‐positive bacteria such as B. subtilis . Similarly to E. coli SSB, B. subtilis SsbA and SsbB both bind ssDNA through an oligosaccharide/oligonucleotide binding (OB) domain and function as homo‐tetramers. However, SsbB lacks the critical C‐terminal tail responsible for protein‐protein interactions, leading to differences in functionality. Although the OB domains of B. subtilis SsbA and SsbB are 63% identitical to one another, native gel analysis indicates that mixtures of SsbA and SsbB do not exchange monomers, but instead maintain strictly homo‐tetrameric quaternary structures. A recent crystal structure of B. subtilis SsbA revealed a unique hydrogen‐bonding interface between SsbA monomers that was not observed in the SsbB structure. We hypothesize that these interface differences could prevent SsbA/SsbB hetero‐tetramer formation. To test this hypothesis, we engineered a B. subtilis SsbA interface variant that change a key OB domain interface residue to the corresponding residue in SsbB (Asp74Ser). This variant failed to allow hetero‐tetramer formation. However, since Asp74 is only one residue in a more complex interaction network, we are now testing our hypothesis using a double variant of SsbA (Asp74Ser, Arg4Gln) that better mimics the SsbB interface network for mixed SsbA/SsbB tetramer formation. If a variant that is capable of forming mixed SsbA/SsbB tetramers is discovered, we plan to use it to test the effects of mixed‐tetramer formation in vivo and to further probe the functions of SSBs in gram‐positive bacteria. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .