Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Diverting Managed Care Medicaid Patients From Pediatric Emergency Department Use
View through CrossRef
Objective. To evaluate the health outcomes of managed care Medicaid children with non-emergent conditions who were not authorized to be seen in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) by their primary care provider.
Design. Consecutive case surveillance from 6/29/92 to 2/2/93.
Setting. University based PED (17,500 visits/year) in inner city Baltimore.
Participants. Cases were MAC children denied authorization to be seen for non-emergent conditions in the PED. Age and complaint matched MAC children were selected from the university based Pediatric Ambulatory Center (PAC) and from non-emergent PED visits (PED-seen) in order to compare utilization rates after denial.
Intervention. The Maryland Access to Care (MAC) Medicaid program (started in 12/91) emphasizes primary care and appropriate health care utilization by incorporating the following elements of managed care: assignment to primary care provider, gatekeeping, mandatory enrollment and fee for service.
Methods. Consecutive case surveillance from 6/29/92 to 2/2/93 was used to evaluate the health outcomes of MAC children denied authorization for non-emergent care in a university based PED. One week following denial, a pediatric nurse practitioner contacted the patient's caretaker and the MAC provider to ascertain health outcome. Medicaid claims data was used to compare the six month health care utilization of the denied group to age and complaint matched children seen in the PED (PED-seen) or in a primary care clinic (PAC).
Results. 216 MAC patients were not authorized for a PED visit by their MAC providers. 123 (57%) saw their MAC provider within one week of the denied PED visit. 40 (18%) were not seen because their presenting complaint had resolved completely. No adverse health outcomes occurred because of delay in health care delivery. The subsequent ER utilization rate of the denied group was the same as the PED-seen comparison group, and significantly higher than that of the PAC group (P = .002). The denied group was hospitalized at a significantly higher rate relative to these comparison groups (P = .003).
Conclusions. Diverting Medicaid children classified as non-emergent in an ER to their MAC providers can be a safe practice short-term. However, denial of a PED visit has no impact on subsequent ER utilization by Medicaid participants and may be associated with higher hospitalization rate. Gatekeeping in this setting does not necessarily change the health care seeking behavior of these patients.
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Title: Diverting Managed Care Medicaid Patients From Pediatric Emergency Department Use
Description:
Objective.
To evaluate the health outcomes of managed care Medicaid children with non-emergent conditions who were not authorized to be seen in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) by their primary care provider.
Design.
Consecutive case surveillance from 6/29/92 to 2/2/93.
Setting.
University based PED (17,500 visits/year) in inner city Baltimore.
Participants.
Cases were MAC children denied authorization to be seen for non-emergent conditions in the PED.
Age and complaint matched MAC children were selected from the university based Pediatric Ambulatory Center (PAC) and from non-emergent PED visits (PED-seen) in order to compare utilization rates after denial.
Intervention.
The Maryland Access to Care (MAC) Medicaid program (started in 12/91) emphasizes primary care and appropriate health care utilization by incorporating the following elements of managed care: assignment to primary care provider, gatekeeping, mandatory enrollment and fee for service.
Methods.
Consecutive case surveillance from 6/29/92 to 2/2/93 was used to evaluate the health outcomes of MAC children denied authorization for non-emergent care in a university based PED.
One week following denial, a pediatric nurse practitioner contacted the patient's caretaker and the MAC provider to ascertain health outcome.
Medicaid claims data was used to compare the six month health care utilization of the denied group to age and complaint matched children seen in the PED (PED-seen) or in a primary care clinic (PAC).
Results.
216 MAC patients were not authorized for a PED visit by their MAC providers.
123 (57%) saw their MAC provider within one week of the denied PED visit.
40 (18%) were not seen because their presenting complaint had resolved completely.
No adverse health outcomes occurred because of delay in health care delivery.
The subsequent ER utilization rate of the denied group was the same as the PED-seen comparison group, and significantly higher than that of the PAC group (P = .
002).
The denied group was hospitalized at a significantly higher rate relative to these comparison groups (P = .
003).
Conclusions.
Diverting Medicaid children classified as non-emergent in an ER to their MAC providers can be a safe practice short-term.
However, denial of a PED visit has no impact on subsequent ER utilization by Medicaid participants and may be associated with higher hospitalization rate.
Gatekeeping in this setting does not necessarily change the health care seeking behavior of these patients.
Related Results
Medicaid Expansion and Severe Maternal Morbidity
Medicaid Expansion and Severe Maternal Morbidity
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate whether there is an association between state-level Medicaid expansion and severe maternal morbidity (SMM) among Medicaid enrollees who d...
Buprenorphine Dispensing Following Medicaid Expansion Amid Unwinding in North Carolina
Buprenorphine Dispensing Following Medicaid Expansion Amid Unwinding in North Carolina
Importance
The continuous Medicaid enrollment provision adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic ended in March 2023, after which 24 million US residents were disen...
Health insurance, neighborhood income, and emergency department usage by Utah children 1996–1998
Health insurance, neighborhood income, and emergency department usage by Utah children 1996–1998
Abstract
Background
It is estimated that approximately half of emergency department (ED) usage in the U.S. and other developed count...
The Geographic Distribution of Pediatric Anesthesiologists Relative to the US Pediatric Population
The Geographic Distribution of Pediatric Anesthesiologists Relative to the US Pediatric Population
BACKGROUND:
The geographic relationship between pediatric anesthesiologists and the pediatric population has potentially important clinical and policy implications. In ...
The Effect of Community Type on Access to Orthopedic Services for Medicaid-Insured Patients
The Effect of Community Type on Access to Orthopedic Services for Medicaid-Insured Patients
Purpose Medicaid-insured patients have less access to specialty care compared to those who are privately insured. Limited and delayed access to orthopaedic services can affect pati...
The Pediatric Anesthesiology Workforce: Projecting Supply and Trends 2015–2035
The Pediatric Anesthesiology Workforce: Projecting Supply and Trends 2015–2035
BACKGROUND:
A workforce analysis was conducted to predict whether the projected future supply of pediatric anesthesiologists is balanced with the requirements o...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Applying the Theoretical Domains Framework to the Implementation of Medicaid Coverage for Doula Services: Doulas’ Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators in the State of Florida
Applying the Theoretical Domains Framework to the Implementation of Medicaid Coverage for Doula Services: Doulas’ Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators in the State of Florida
Abstract
As of September 2023, more than half of US states have either expanded Medicaid to cover doula care or are in the process of implementing doula care into M...

