Development and Test of Social Director of Sports Psychological Contract Scale

In order to provide important realistic basis for standardizing, guiding and governing the guiding behavior of social sports instructors, the measuring tools of psychological expectation were compiled. According to the survey data of 285 social sports instructors and 365 social sports instructors, project analysis, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were carried out, and reliability and validity tests were conducted. The results are as follows: (1) the social sports instructors psychological contract scale by the growth and development, belonging and identity and norms and guidelines of three dimensions, 36 projects, divided into organizational responsibility subscales (growth liability, ownership, standard responsibility) and personal responsibility subscales (development rule of liability, recognition and responsibility) two subscales. (2) The Cronbach's Alpha value of organizational responsibility scale was 0.927 and KMO was 0.904 (P<0.5); the Cronbach's Alpha value of personal responsibility scale was 0.932 and KMO was 0.921 (P<0.5). The subscales of organizational responsibility and personal responsibility χ2/ DF < 3, GFI > 0.8, CFI < 0.9, RMSEA < 0.8; the structure and data fit well and meet the requirements of psychological test. (3) It is consistent with the realistic, conditional exchange and development-oriented dimensions of the authoritative psychological contract research contents at home and abroad, and reflects the group characteristics of social sports instructors in the expressions and specific items. Individual responsibility is greater than organizational responsibility; Organizational norms and personal norms have the highest expectation of responsibility; the pursuit of growth and development is greater than belonging identification. The psychological contract scale for social sports instructors has a reasonable structure, good reliability and validity, and reflects the value pursuit of the group. It is an ideal evaluation tool for studying the psychological contract of social sports instructors.