Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Truth in Sentencing

View through CrossRef
The chapter explores the evolution of early release policy and practice between 1987 and 1992—a transitional period sometimes described as an ‘Indian Summer’ for liberal criminal justice policy. It begins with a brief overview of the challenges facing the criminal justice system on the eve of the 1987 General Election. It goes on to consider the piecemeal modification of remission arrangements in July 1987, a measure to relieve pressure on the prison system that ultimately came at a high cost for the Home Office. It provides a detailed overview of the proceedings of the Carlisle Committee and the compromises that laid the ground for their final report ‘The Parole System in England and Wales’. The chapter concludes by reflecting upon the initial reaction to the Carlisle Report and the considerable uncertainty within the Home Office about how best to respond to these challenging proposals.
Title: Truth in Sentencing
Description:
The chapter explores the evolution of early release policy and practice between 1987 and 1992—a transitional period sometimes described as an ‘Indian Summer’ for liberal criminal justice policy.
It begins with a brief overview of the challenges facing the criminal justice system on the eve of the 1987 General Election.
It goes on to consider the piecemeal modification of remission arrangements in July 1987, a measure to relieve pressure on the prison system that ultimately came at a high cost for the Home Office.
It provides a detailed overview of the proceedings of the Carlisle Committee and the compromises that laid the ground for their final report ‘The Parole System in England and Wales’.
The chapter concludes by reflecting upon the initial reaction to the Carlisle Report and the considerable uncertainty within the Home Office about how best to respond to these challenging proposals.

Related Results

21. Sentencing Procedure and the General Principles of Sentencing
21. Sentencing Procedure and the General Principles of Sentencing
This chapter explains the procedure on passing sentence and the general principles that govern a court’s decision when passing sentence. It discusses the role of the Crow Prosecuti...
21. Sentencing Procedure and the General Principles of Sentencing
21. Sentencing Procedure and the General Principles of Sentencing
This chapter explains the procedure on passing sentence and the general principles that govern a court’s decision when passing sentence. It discusses the role of the Crow Prosecuti...
21. Sentencing Procedure and the General Principles of Sentencing
21. Sentencing Procedure and the General Principles of Sentencing
This chapter explains the procedure on passing sentence and the general principles that govern a court’s decision when passing sentence. It discusses the role of the Crow Prosecuti...
Truth-Making and the Nature of Truth
Truth-Making and the Nature of Truth
Chapter 9 claimed that a way to preserve ideas about truth-making is to think of truth differently for different sorts of claims. However, what, exactly is the connection between t...
Sentencing, Public Opinion, and Criminal Justice
Sentencing, Public Opinion, and Criminal Justice
Abstract This volume celebrates the achievements of Julian V Roberts KC (Hon), Emeritus Professor of Criminology at the University of Oxford, over forty years of sch...
Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries
Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries
Abstract This collection of original essays surveys the evolution of sentencing policies and practices in Western countries over the past twenty-five years. The volu...
Reassessing Truth Commissions
Reassessing Truth Commissions
Truth commissions are temporary institutions that are tasked with investigating patterns of political violence under a prior regime as part of a process of political change. In the...
Public Prosecutors and Discretion
Public Prosecutors and Discretion
Abstract The role of the public prosecutor in sentencing has become the subject of intense debate in recent years. Experts recognize that their influence on sente...

Back to Top