Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Maternal pain and anxiety in genetic amniocentesis: expectation versus reality

View through CrossRef
AbstractObjectiveTo investigate maternal perceptions of both pain and anxiety before and after genetic amniocentesis.Study designThis prospective study of midtrimester, singleton pregnancies was conducted between March 2000 and July 2000. Study variables included patient demographics, medical and obstetric histories, indication for amniocentesis and a description of the source of information used by the patient regarding the procedure and technical degree of difficulty. Maternal pain and anxiety associated with performing amniocentesis were subjectively quantified with the use of the visual analog scale (VAS). Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed rank test, anova, and simple and stepwise regression analyses.ResultsOne hundred and eighty‐three women participated in the study. Perception of pain before amniocentesis was significantly higher compared to that expressed immediately after the procedure, with a mean VAS score of 3.7 ± 2.5 vs. 2.1 ± 2.0 (P < 0.0001). Similarly, perception of anxiety was significantly greater prior to the procedure, with a mean VAS score of 4.6 ± 2.8 vs. 2.8 ± 2.4 after the amniocentesis (P < 0.0001). Perceptions of pain and anxiety were significantly and positively correlated to each other both before and after the procedure (P < 0.0001). History of a prior amniocentesis was the only variable associated with reducing expected pain and anxiety (negative correlation, P < 0.001), whereas the technical degree of difficulty was the only significant variable impacting on the actual pain and anxiety (positive correlation, P < 0.005).ConclusionsPreamniocentesis counseling should emphasize the fact that, for most women, the actual pain and anxiety experienced during the procedure are significantly lower than expected. In fact, on a scale of 0–10, the mean level of pain was only 2.1, with a slightly higher mean level of anxiety. Copyright © 2002 ISUOG
Title: Maternal pain and anxiety in genetic amniocentesis: expectation versus reality
Description:
AbstractObjectiveTo investigate maternal perceptions of both pain and anxiety before and after genetic amniocentesis.
Study designThis prospective study of midtrimester, singleton pregnancies was conducted between March 2000 and July 2000.
Study variables included patient demographics, medical and obstetric histories, indication for amniocentesis and a description of the source of information used by the patient regarding the procedure and technical degree of difficulty.
Maternal pain and anxiety associated with performing amniocentesis were subjectively quantified with the use of the visual analog scale (VAS).
Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon signed rank test, anova, and simple and stepwise regression analyses.
ResultsOne hundred and eighty‐three women participated in the study.
Perception of pain before amniocentesis was significantly higher compared to that expressed immediately after the procedure, with a mean VAS score of 3.
7 ± 2.
5 vs.
2.
1 ± 2.
0 (P < 0.
0001).
Similarly, perception of anxiety was significantly greater prior to the procedure, with a mean VAS score of 4.
6 ± 2.
8 vs.
2.
8 ± 2.
4 after the amniocentesis (P < 0.
0001).
Perceptions of pain and anxiety were significantly and positively correlated to each other both before and after the procedure (P < 0.
0001).
History of a prior amniocentesis was the only variable associated with reducing expected pain and anxiety (negative correlation, P < 0.
001), whereas the technical degree of difficulty was the only significant variable impacting on the actual pain and anxiety (positive correlation, P < 0.
005).
ConclusionsPreamniocentesis counseling should emphasize the fact that, for most women, the actual pain and anxiety experienced during the procedure are significantly lower than expected.
In fact, on a scale of 0–10, the mean level of pain was only 2.
1, with a slightly higher mean level of anxiety.
Copyright © 2002 ISUOG.

Related Results

Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Autistic women report high levels of pain, pain-related anxiety, and pain interference
Autistic women report high levels of pain, pain-related anxiety, and pain interference
Abstract Introduction: Evidence suggests autistic adults experience pain in different ways compared with nonautistic peop...
Ramifications of third trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study
Ramifications of third trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study
Abstract Background: To determine the association between gestational age at amniocentesis and procedure-related complications in twin gestations.Methods: A retrospective ...
Genetic Amniocentesis in Multiple Pregnancy
Genetic Amniocentesis in Multiple Pregnancy
<i>Objectives:</i> Second-trimester genetic amniocentesis is the most frequently used invasive prenatal diagnostic technique. Several reports have been published about ...
Development of the Ego and Discomfort Anxiety Inventory: Initial Validity and Reliability
Development of the Ego and Discomfort Anxiety Inventory: Initial Validity and Reliability
This article reports on four studies regarding the development, reliability, and validity of scales to measure two forms of anxiety, ego anxiety and discomfort anxiety. In the firs...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...
Second trimester amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders in Bangladesh
Second trimester amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders in Bangladesh
Background: Amniocentesis is characteristically carried out under ultra-sonographic control, between 15 and 17 weeks of pregnancy. The term prenatal diagnosis firmly comprises all ...

Back to Top