Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Cochlear Implantation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Experience From the UK Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Service

View through CrossRef
Objective: To review the outcomes of cochlear implants (CI) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) in a large cohort, and identify factors associated with poor hearing benefit. Study Design: Fifteen-year retrospective national observational case series. Setting: United Kingdom regional NF2 multidisciplinary teams. Patients: Consecutive patients with NF2 receiving a CI. Interventions: CI for hearing rehabilitation. Main outcome measures: 1) Audiometric performance at 9 to 12 months after implantation using City University of New York (CUNY) sentence recognition score, and Bamford- Kowal-Bench (BKB) word recognition score in quiet (BKBq), and in noise (BKBn). 2) CI use at most recent review. Results: Sixty four consecutive patients, median age 43 years, were included. Nine to 12 months mean audiometric scores were: CUNY 60.9%, BKBq 45.8%, BKBn 41.6%. There was no difference in audiometric outcomes between VS treatment modalities. At most recent review (median 3.6 years from implantation), 84.9% with device in situ/available data were full or part-time users. Between 9 and 12 months and most recent review there was an interval reduction in mean audiometric scores: CUNY −12.9%, BKBq −3.3%, BKBn −4.9%. Larger tumor size and shorter duration of profound hearing loss were the only variables associated with poorer audiometric scores. Tumor growth at the time of surgery was the only variable associated with CI non-use. Individual patient response was highly variable. Conclusions: CI can provide significant and sustained auditory benefits to patients with NF2 independent of tumor treatment modality, with the majority of those implanted becoming at least part-time users. Larger datasets are required to reliably assess the role of independent variables.
Title: Cochlear Implantation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Experience From the UK Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Service
Description:
Objective: To review the outcomes of cochlear implants (CI) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) in a large cohort, and identify factors associated with poor hearing benefit.
Study Design: Fifteen-year retrospective national observational case series.
Setting: United Kingdom regional NF2 multidisciplinary teams.
Patients: Consecutive patients with NF2 receiving a CI.
Interventions: CI for hearing rehabilitation.
Main outcome measures: 1) Audiometric performance at 9 to 12 months after implantation using City University of New York (CUNY) sentence recognition score, and Bamford- Kowal-Bench (BKB) word recognition score in quiet (BKBq), and in noise (BKBn).
2) CI use at most recent review.
Results: Sixty four consecutive patients, median age 43 years, were included.
Nine to 12 months mean audiometric scores were: CUNY 60.
9%, BKBq 45.
8%, BKBn 41.
6%.
There was no difference in audiometric outcomes between VS treatment modalities.
At most recent review (median 3.
6 years from implantation), 84.
9% with device in situ/available data were full or part-time users.
Between 9 and 12 months and most recent review there was an interval reduction in mean audiometric scores: CUNY −12.
9%, BKBq −3.
3%, BKBn −4.
9%.
Larger tumor size and shorter duration of profound hearing loss were the only variables associated with poorer audiometric scores.
Tumor growth at the time of surgery was the only variable associated with CI non-use.
Individual patient response was highly variable.
Conclusions: CI can provide significant and sustained auditory benefits to patients with NF2 independent of tumor treatment modality, with the majority of those implanted becoming at least part-time users.
Larger datasets are required to reliably assess the role of independent variables.

Related Results

The Therapeutic Dilemma of Cochlear Nerve Deficiency: Cochlear or Brainstem Implantation?
The Therapeutic Dilemma of Cochlear Nerve Deficiency: Cochlear or Brainstem Implantation?
ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes between 2 age‐matched cohorts of children with cochlear nerve deficiency: those receiving auditory brainstem implants (group A) or cochlear implant...
Objective Measures at Different Stages of Cochlear Implantation: A Data Analysis
Objective Measures at Different Stages of Cochlear Implantation: A Data Analysis
Objectives: The aim of this literature review was to summarize the results of scientific publications on the use of objective electrophysiological methods at different stages of co...
The Effect of Cochlear Coverage on Auditory and Speech Performance in Cochlear Implant Patients
The Effect of Cochlear Coverage on Auditory and Speech Performance in Cochlear Implant Patients
Objective: To determine the effect of cochlear coverage on audiological and speech parameters in patients with cochlear implants. Previous work has investigated the eff...
Retinitis Pigmentosa
Retinitis Pigmentosa
In studying the cases with typical and atypical pigmentary degeneration of the retina we strived to analyse in the clinical material all ophthalmoscopic and ocular changes together...
Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Syndrome: A Case Report
Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Syndrome: A Case Report
Objective: To evaluate cochlear implantation in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome with regard to surgical difficulties and hearing outcomes. ...
Language Development in Children with Cochlear Implant using Bimodal Approach: SLP Perspective
Language Development in Children with Cochlear Implant using Bimodal Approach: SLP Perspective
Background: The development of language skills in children with cochlear implants is a vital area of research, particularly in understanding the impact of the bimodal approach. Thi...
Hearing optimisation in neurofibromatosis type 2: A systematic review
Hearing optimisation in neurofibromatosis type 2: A systematic review
BackgroundIt is common for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 to develop bilateral profound hearing loss hearing loss, and this is one of the main determinants of quality of li...

Back to Top