Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Psychiatric Examination of the Neurologic Patient
View through CrossRef
A well-conducted psychiatric evaluation is central to the care of neurologic patients with psychiatric disorders. The evaluation is aimed at defining the psychiatric condition in the context of the patient’s past psychiatric history and current neurologic disease. The information derived from the evaluation is used to develop a formulation, establish a diagnosis, and form a basis for treatment planning. This chapter discusses the psychiatric evaluation of the neurologic patient in detail. It includes examination techniques and questions as well as practical approaches to conducting an assessment of the patient’s cognitive state. Along the way, common psychiatric symptoms encountered in neurologic patients are defined and differentiated from related symptoms. The chapter concludes by illustrating how to generate a formulation and differential diagnosis. The psychiatric evaluation consists of three parts: the history; the mental status examination (MSE); and the formulation, including the differential diagnosis. The history, which is essential to defining the problem, is taken from the patient and from one or more informants. The importance of taking a history from an informant is underscored in the context of neurologic disease because patients may be forgetful, lack insight, or have language and other cognitive problems that may limit their ability to provide a good history. History-taking begins with defining the psychiatric chief complaint and then obtaining the family and personal history. Starting in this way, rather than with the chief complaint followed by the history of present illness (HPI), makes it easier to see that the psychiatric symptoms may have been caused by, or influenced by, factors other than the neurologic disease—factors that can include psychiatric disorders as such, aspects of patients’ personalities, and responses patients have to the circumstances of their lives. Table 1–1 provides an outline of important elements of the psychiatric history for neurologic patients and can be used as a checklist in clinical practice. Defining the psychiatric chief complaint is the physician’s first task. ‘‘Psychiatric chief complaint’’ in this context refers to the occurrence of cognitive, affective, behavioral, or perceptual phenomena that are brought to the physician’s attention by the patient, a family member or other informant, or by the physician’s own observation.
Title: The Psychiatric Examination of the Neurologic Patient
Description:
A well-conducted psychiatric evaluation is central to the care of neurologic patients with psychiatric disorders.
The evaluation is aimed at defining the psychiatric condition in the context of the patient’s past psychiatric history and current neurologic disease.
The information derived from the evaluation is used to develop a formulation, establish a diagnosis, and form a basis for treatment planning.
This chapter discusses the psychiatric evaluation of the neurologic patient in detail.
It includes examination techniques and questions as well as practical approaches to conducting an assessment of the patient’s cognitive state.
Along the way, common psychiatric symptoms encountered in neurologic patients are defined and differentiated from related symptoms.
The chapter concludes by illustrating how to generate a formulation and differential diagnosis.
The psychiatric evaluation consists of three parts: the history; the mental status examination (MSE); and the formulation, including the differential diagnosis.
The history, which is essential to defining the problem, is taken from the patient and from one or more informants.
The importance of taking a history from an informant is underscored in the context of neurologic disease because patients may be forgetful, lack insight, or have language and other cognitive problems that may limit their ability to provide a good history.
History-taking begins with defining the psychiatric chief complaint and then obtaining the family and personal history.
Starting in this way, rather than with the chief complaint followed by the history of present illness (HPI), makes it easier to see that the psychiatric symptoms may have been caused by, or influenced by, factors other than the neurologic disease—factors that can include psychiatric disorders as such, aspects of patients’ personalities, and responses patients have to the circumstances of their lives.
Table 1–1 provides an outline of important elements of the psychiatric history for neurologic patients and can be used as a checklist in clinical practice.
Defining the psychiatric chief complaint is the physician’s first task.
‘‘Psychiatric chief complaint’’ in this context refers to the occurrence of cognitive, affective, behavioral, or perceptual phenomena that are brought to the physician’s attention by the patient, a family member or other informant, or by the physician’s own observation.
Related Results
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Fregoli Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review
Fregoli Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction: Fregoli syndrome is a rare misidentification disorder that can disrupt behavior, endanger safety, and impair quality of life. Its occurrence in young adults ...
DETECTION OF NEUROLOGIC INJURY IN OPERATIVE PELVIC FRACTURES: A MISSED OPPORTUNITY?
DETECTION OF NEUROLOGIC INJURY IN OPERATIVE PELVIC FRACTURES: A MISSED OPPORTUNITY?
Neurologic injury after pelvic fractures occurs in 10–30% of cases and can lead to chronic pain, sexual dysfunction, limb weakness, and incontinence. Neurologic injury is also an i...
Voluntary and involuntary hospitalizations in acute psychiatric wards in Norway
Voluntary and involuntary hospitalizations in acute psychiatric wards in Norway
Background and aim The use of coercion in mental health care services has been widely debated, and it is agreed that the level of coercive hospitalizations should be as low as pos...
Psychiatric nursing techniques
Psychiatric nursing techniques
AbstractPsychiatric nursing as an entity has really only evolved since the Second World War. Psychiatric nurses (now often referred to as mental health nurses in the United Kingdom...
Influencing factors of moral resilience among psychiatric nurses: a cross-sectional survey
Influencing factors of moral resilience among psychiatric nurses: a cross-sectional survey
Abstract
Objective
This study investigates the level of moral resilience among psychiatric nurses and the factors influencing it. The aim is to provide foundational insight...
Neurologic manifestations of AIDS: a review of fifty cases in Santos
Neurologic manifestations of AIDS: a review of fifty cases in Santos
OBJECTIVE: To review the neurologic manifestations of AIDS in patients who were admitted to Hospital Guilherme Álvaro (HGA) due to any clinical manifestation of the disease. DESIGN...
Bridging Mental Health and National Security: The Transformative Impact of Psychiatric Nursing on Public Safety
Bridging Mental Health and National Security: The Transformative Impact of Psychiatric Nursing on Public Safety
Mental health is an essential but often overlooked component of national security and public safety. Untreated mental illnesses contribute to public disturbances, crime, and vulner...

