Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Evolution of FMVSS 213: Child Restraint Systems

View through CrossRef
<div class="htmlview paragraph"><i>Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 213</i> specifies requirements for child restraint systems used in motor vehicles and was first introduced by the National Highway Safety Bureau in 1971. In 1981, the standard was modified to require dynamic testing of child restraints. Over the following 21 years, Standard No.</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">213 was modified on numerous occasions, most recently in June of 2003. This paper outlines the history of Standard No. 213 with a discussion of the changes that have been proposed, the comments submitted to NHTSA in response to these proposed changes, and NHTSA's final decision (rule making) regarding which changes to adopt. Detailed discussion is included regarding NHTSA's May 2002 proposal to change the crash pulse, test dummies, injury criteria, and test bench required as part of the dynamic testing. The 2002 proposal also included expansion of the standard to cover child restraints for children weighing up to 65 pounds. Before issuing a final rule, NHTSA reviewed numerous comments from industry, academia, professional societies, special interest groups, and private citizens. In addition, both NHTSA and the Juvenile Products Manufacturers Association conducted extensive test programs to evaluate NHTSA's proposed changes to Standard No. 213. In June 2003, NHTSA issued a final rule that adopted the revised crash pulse, test dummies, and test bench. The final rule also adopted the proposal to cover child restraints for children weighing up to 65 pounds. However, the standard did not adopt the proposed modifications to the injury criteria, with the exception of a modification to the way that the head injury criterion (HIC) is calculated. This paper discusses the reasons that NHTSA adopted the modifications to the crash pulse, test dummies, and test bench, yet did not adopt the revised injury criteria.</div>
Title: The Evolution of FMVSS 213: Child Restraint Systems
Description:
<div class="htmlview paragraph"><i>Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No.
213</i> specifies requirements for child restraint systems used in motor vehicles and was first introduced by the National Highway Safety Bureau in 1971.
In 1981, the standard was modified to require dynamic testing of child restraints.
Over the following 21 years, Standard No.
</div> <div class="htmlview paragraph">213 was modified on numerous occasions, most recently in June of 2003.
This paper outlines the history of Standard No.
213 with a discussion of the changes that have been proposed, the comments submitted to NHTSA in response to these proposed changes, and NHTSA's final decision (rule making) regarding which changes to adopt.
Detailed discussion is included regarding NHTSA's May 2002 proposal to change the crash pulse, test dummies, injury criteria, and test bench required as part of the dynamic testing.
The 2002 proposal also included expansion of the standard to cover child restraints for children weighing up to 65 pounds.
Before issuing a final rule, NHTSA reviewed numerous comments from industry, academia, professional societies, special interest groups, and private citizens.
In addition, both NHTSA and the Juvenile Products Manufacturers Association conducted extensive test programs to evaluate NHTSA's proposed changes to Standard No.
213.
In June 2003, NHTSA issued a final rule that adopted the revised crash pulse, test dummies, and test bench.
The final rule also adopted the proposal to cover child restraints for children weighing up to 65 pounds.
However, the standard did not adopt the proposed modifications to the injury criteria, with the exception of a modification to the way that the head injury criterion (HIC) is calculated.
This paper discusses the reasons that NHTSA adopted the modifications to the crash pulse, test dummies, and test bench, yet did not adopt the revised injury criteria.
</div>.

Related Results

FMVSS Child Occupant Protection Regulations
FMVSS Child Occupant Protection Regulations
<div class="htmlview paragraph">The <i>Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards</i> (FMVSS) include a number of different regulations that are applicable to child o...
Prevalence of child restraint system use and parental knowledge of such systems in Mianyang, China
Prevalence of child restraint system use and parental knowledge of such systems in Mianyang, China
Abstract Background This study investigated the prevalence of restraint system use for children passengers in cars, and it assessed parental knowledge and attitudes about ...
Minimizing the Use of Restraint in Patients with Mental Disorders at a Mental Hospital: A Systematic Review
Minimizing the Use of Restraint in Patients with Mental Disorders at a Mental Hospital: A Systematic Review
Background: Restraint in the psychiatric unit is a common practice but it is very controversial and it has undergone a poor evaluation according to methodological investigations. U...
Restraint reduction in general hospital care by preventive patient involvement: a pilot study
Restraint reduction in general hospital care by preventive patient involvement: a pilot study
Abstract Background For general hospital settings, effective restraint reduction strategies are lacking. Patient involvement is proven to be usef...
Improving Child Safety Seat Performance Through Finite Element Simulations
Improving Child Safety Seat Performance Through Finite Element Simulations
In this study, a finite element (FE) model of a child seat was developed. This model along with a HIII 6-year-old child ATD model was validated against four sled tests with differe...
The Design and Application of a New Type of Bed Sheet Restraint Device: A Randomized Controlled Study
The Design and Application of a New Type of Bed Sheet Restraint Device: A Randomized Controlled Study
Objective: To observe the application effect of the new type of bed sheet restraint device in NICU. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was carried out. A total of 100 patient...
Impact of Dieting Status and Dietary Restraint on Postexercise Energy Intake in Overweight Women
Impact of Dieting Status and Dietary Restraint on Postexercise Energy Intake in Overweight Women
AbstractObjective: To investigate the unknown relationship between dieting status and dietary restraint on postexercise energy intake (PE‐EI) in overweight sedentary women after a ...
The Eileen Skellern Lecture 2014: physical restraint: in defence of the indefensible?
The Eileen Skellern Lecture 2014: physical restraint: in defence of the indefensible?
Accessible summary What is known on the subject: The physical and psychological trauma that can occur as a result of physical restraint is increasingly highlighted in the media and...

Back to Top