Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The imaginative mind

View through CrossRef
AbstractThe astounding capacity for the human imagination to be engaged across a wide range of contexts is limitless and fundamental to our day‐to‐day experiences. Although processes of imagination are central to human psychological function, they rarely occupy center stage in academic discourse or empirical study within psychological and neuroscientific realms. The aim of this paper is to tackle this imbalance by drawing together the multitudinous facets of imagination within a common framework. The processes fall into one of five categories depending on whether they are characterized as involving perceptual/motor related mental imagery, intentionality or recollective processing, novel combinatorial or generative processing, exceptional phenomenology in the aesthetic response, or altered psychological states which range from commonplace to dysfunctional. These proposed categories are defined on the basis of theoretical ideas from philosophy as well as empirical evidence from neuroscience. By synthesizing the findings across these domains of imagination, this novel five‐part or quinquepartite classification of the human imagination aids in systematizing, and thereby abets, our understanding of the workings and neural foundations of the human imagination. It would serve as a blueprint to direct further advances in the field of imagination while also promoting crosstalk with reference to stimulus‐oriented facets of information processing. A biologically and ecologically valid psychology is one that seeks to explain fundamental aspects of human nature. Given the ubiquitous nature of the imaginative operations in our daily lives, there can be little doubt that these quintessential aspects of the mind should be central to the discussion. Hum Brain Mapp 37:4197–4211, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Title: The imaginative mind
Description:
AbstractThe astounding capacity for the human imagination to be engaged across a wide range of contexts is limitless and fundamental to our day‐to‐day experiences.
Although processes of imagination are central to human psychological function, they rarely occupy center stage in academic discourse or empirical study within psychological and neuroscientific realms.
The aim of this paper is to tackle this imbalance by drawing together the multitudinous facets of imagination within a common framework.
The processes fall into one of five categories depending on whether they are characterized as involving perceptual/motor related mental imagery, intentionality or recollective processing, novel combinatorial or generative processing, exceptional phenomenology in the aesthetic response, or altered psychological states which range from commonplace to dysfunctional.
These proposed categories are defined on the basis of theoretical ideas from philosophy as well as empirical evidence from neuroscience.
By synthesizing the findings across these domains of imagination, this novel five‐part or quinquepartite classification of the human imagination aids in systematizing, and thereby abets, our understanding of the workings and neural foundations of the human imagination.
It would serve as a blueprint to direct further advances in the field of imagination while also promoting crosstalk with reference to stimulus‐oriented facets of information processing.
A biologically and ecologically valid psychology is one that seeks to explain fundamental aspects of human nature.
Given the ubiquitous nature of the imaginative operations in our daily lives, there can be little doubt that these quintessential aspects of the mind should be central to the discussion.
Hum Brain Mapp 37:4197–4211, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Related Results

The relationship between transliminality, hypnotic and imaginative suggestibility, and other personality traits.
The relationship between transliminality, hypnotic and imaginative suggestibility, and other personality traits.
Transliminality may be considered as the tendency for an individual to experience a blurring of boundaries between unconscious and conscious states. The purpose of this study was t...
The wandering mind, the focussed mind and the meta-aware mind
The wandering mind, the focussed mind and the meta-aware mind
Caught within fast paced- urban industrial society, many of us may not ask questions about the nature of our mind, thoughts, although our mind, and thoughts often cause distress to...
The Foundations of Cognitive Archaeology
The Foundations of Cognitive Archaeology
An empirically supported proposal for synthesizing multiple approaches to the study of the mind in the past. In The Foundations of Cognitive Archaeology, Marc Abrami...
Kedudukan Wahyu dan Akal dalam Penghujahan berdasarkan Ilmu Mantik
Kedudukan Wahyu dan Akal dalam Penghujahan berdasarkan Ilmu Mantik
This article focuses on the discussion about the positions of the human mind and prophetic revelations in Islamic research. In the usual Social Science research, only the human min...
Emotion in Imaginative Resistance
Emotion in Imaginative Resistance
Imaginative resistance refers to cases in which one’s otherwise flexible imaginative capacity is constrained by an unwillingness or inability to imaginatively engage with a given c...
Assessing the Impact of Creative Tasks on Cognitive and Imaginative Development in Children
Assessing the Impact of Creative Tasks on Cognitive and Imaginative Development in Children
Children's cognitive and imaginative development is greatly enhanced by creative projects, which establish the groundwork for critical thinking, problem-solving, and flexibility. B...
WITTGENSTEIN’S LINGUISTIC TURN ON MIND-BODY PROBLEM
WITTGENSTEIN’S LINGUISTIC TURN ON MIND-BODY PROBLEM
The paper proposes to discuss famous linguistic philosopher, Ludwig Wittgenstein’s stand point of linguistic school. Wittgenstein brings a linguistic turn to the mind-body problem....

Back to Top