Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Biostratigraphy and depositional environments of the Palaeocene–Eocene succession at Um El Huwaitat area, Eastern Desert, Egypt

View through CrossRef
The Palaeocene–Eocene succession in southwest Safaga, Eastern Desert, Egypt has been studied to determine its lithostratigraphic units, biostratigraphic zonation, microfacies association, and depositional environments. The variation in lithofacies allows the subdivision of the Danian–Ypresian interval into four lithostratigraphic units that are arranged, from base to top, as the Dakhla Shale (only its upper part), Tarawan Chalk, Esna Shale, and Thebes Formation (only its lower part). Moreover, the Esna Shale is further subdivided into four members, arranged from base to top, as El Hanadi, Dababiya Quarry, El Mahmiya, and Abu Had. The depositional setting is interpreted to primarily reflect the relative sea‐level changes. The planktonic/benthic (P/B) foraminiferal ratio is indicative of oscillations of depositional settings in normal open marine conditions, ranging from shallow inner to outer neritic environments. Biostratigraphically, the Palaeocene–Eocene succession in the studied area is subdivided into 12 biozones and subbiozones. These are correlated with the standard biozonation of the Palaeocene–Eocene. Deposition of the Palaeocene–Eocene succession in the studied area took place on a relatively stable shelf. Three lithofacies were recognized: shale, marl, and limestone. The shale lithofacies is differentiated into two sub‐lithofacies; pure shale and calcareous foraminiferal shale, whereas marl lithofacies contains abundant planktonic foraminifera. The encountered carbonate rocks comprise eight microfacies types. In addition, the studied interval is correlated with the Global Standard Stratotype Section and Point in the Dababiya section, south of Luxor, Egypt.
Title: Biostratigraphy and depositional environments of the Palaeocene–Eocene succession at Um El Huwaitat area, Eastern Desert, Egypt
Description:
The Palaeocene–Eocene succession in southwest Safaga, Eastern Desert, Egypt has been studied to determine its lithostratigraphic units, biostratigraphic zonation, microfacies association, and depositional environments.
The variation in lithofacies allows the subdivision of the Danian–Ypresian interval into four lithostratigraphic units that are arranged, from base to top, as the Dakhla Shale (only its upper part), Tarawan Chalk, Esna Shale, and Thebes Formation (only its lower part).
Moreover, the Esna Shale is further subdivided into four members, arranged from base to top, as El Hanadi, Dababiya Quarry, El Mahmiya, and Abu Had.
The depositional setting is interpreted to primarily reflect the relative sea‐level changes.
The planktonic/benthic (P/B) foraminiferal ratio is indicative of oscillations of depositional settings in normal open marine conditions, ranging from shallow inner to outer neritic environments.
Biostratigraphically, the Palaeocene–Eocene succession in the studied area is subdivided into 12 biozones and subbiozones.
These are correlated with the standard biozonation of the Palaeocene–Eocene.
Deposition of the Palaeocene–Eocene succession in the studied area took place on a relatively stable shelf.
Three lithofacies were recognized: shale, marl, and limestone.
The shale lithofacies is differentiated into two sub‐lithofacies; pure shale and calcareous foraminiferal shale, whereas marl lithofacies contains abundant planktonic foraminifera.
The encountered carbonate rocks comprise eight microfacies types.
In addition, the studied interval is correlated with the Global Standard Stratotype Section and Point in the Dababiya section, south of Luxor, Egypt.

Related Results

Biosiliceous and geochemical response to biotic and climatic events in the Palaeocene
Biosiliceous and geochemical response to biotic and climatic events in the Palaeocene
Abstract. Hyperthermal events are a key element in understanding Palaeogene climate history, but many of these events outside of prominent Palaeocene Eocene Thermal Maximum are poo...
NEPTUNE: an Innovative Approach to significantly Improve Reservoir Modeling in Carbonate Reservoirs
NEPTUNE: an Innovative Approach to significantly Improve Reservoir Modeling in Carbonate Reservoirs
Abstract In all shelf marine depositional environments, and it is specially true in Carbonates, preserving 3D geological consistency while building reservoir mode...
Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Ecological Sensitivity in the Desert of China from 1981 to 2022
Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Ecological Sensitivity in the Desert of China from 1981 to 2022
The northern desert of China plays an important strategic role in land resource security and national economic development. Research on the spatio-temporal changes of ecological se...
The Eurasian epicontinental sea was an important carbon sink during the Palaeocene-Eocene thermal maximum
The Eurasian epicontinental sea was an important carbon sink during the Palaeocene-Eocene thermal maximum
AbstractThe Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (ca. 56 million years ago) offers a primary analogue for future global warming and carbon cycle recovery. Yet, where and how massive c...

Back to Top