Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

THEORETICAL AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW: MEANING, FUNCTIONS AND DIFFERENCES

View through CrossRef
Both theoretical and conceptual frameworks play a significant role in research studies. However, majority of the researchers do not properly understand their meaning, functions and differences between them. The present study had two objectives; first, to explore the meaning, differences and functions of theoretical and conceptual framework and second, to analyze the need of theoretical framework in legal research. After the systematic review of the literature, the present study found that a theoretical framework is the map constructed with one or more theories to guide a proposed study from inception to reporting. Similarly, the study found that a conceptual framework is constructed with various ideas and concepts taken from numerous theories or empirical studies. Besides, theoretical and conceptual frameworks are similar to the extent of their function and different to the extent of their constituents elements. Moreover, the study found that doctrinal legal research needs a normative framework whereas empirical legal studies require a theoretical or conceptual framework. It is hoped that the present study will enable the researchers to properly understand the meaning, functions and differences between theoretical and conceptual framework. Keywords: Theoretical Framework, Conceptual Framework, Functions of Theoretical and Conceptual Framework, Difference between Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
Title: THEORETICAL AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW: MEANING, FUNCTIONS AND DIFFERENCES
Description:
Both theoretical and conceptual frameworks play a significant role in research studies.
However, majority of the researchers do not properly understand their meaning, functions and differences between them.
The present study had two objectives; first, to explore the meaning, differences and functions of theoretical and conceptual framework and second, to analyze the need of theoretical framework in legal research.
After the systematic review of the literature, the present study found that a theoretical framework is the map constructed with one or more theories to guide a proposed study from inception to reporting.
Similarly, the study found that a conceptual framework is constructed with various ideas and concepts taken from numerous theories or empirical studies.
Besides, theoretical and conceptual frameworks are similar to the extent of their function and different to the extent of their constituents elements.
Moreover, the study found that doctrinal legal research needs a normative framework whereas empirical legal studies require a theoretical or conceptual framework.
It is hoped that the present study will enable the researchers to properly understand the meaning, functions and differences between theoretical and conceptual framework.
Keywords: Theoretical Framework, Conceptual Framework, Functions of Theoretical and Conceptual Framework, Difference between Theoretical and Conceptual Framework.

Related Results

From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR
DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR
DAFTAR PUSTAKAAditama, M. H. R., & Selfiardy, S. (2022). Kehidupan Mahasiswa Kuliah Sambil Bekerja di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Kidspedia: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 3(...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
The study deal with selected problems of international law at the time of change of the 20th and 21st centuries. Such a milestone gives an opportunity to review the achieved state ...
Paul’s view of the law in Romans and the Ethiopic tradition
Paul’s view of the law in Romans and the Ethiopic tradition
ABSTRACT This dissertation examines Paul’s view of the law in Romans, interacting with modern exegetical traditions addressing the Old, New, and Radical New Perspectives, aiming to...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com Abstract Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Editorial: Complexity of Medical Law
Editorial: Complexity of Medical Law
If one puts forward a question what medical law is all about, the common answer will be medical mishaps as result of clinical negligence leading to lawsuit and/or inquires of disci...

Back to Top