Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Reimagining the Mughal Emperors Akbar and Aurangzeb in the 21st Century
View through CrossRef
The paper focuses on the reigns and policies of the two Mughal Emperors, Akbar and Aurangzeb, and analyses how they have been remembered in the wider social memory. While Akbar is glorified as a 'secular' and 'liberal' leader, Aurangzeb is often dismissed and ridiculed as a 'religious bigot', who tried to impose the Shari'ah law in diversified India. The paper traces and evaluates the construction of these two grand narratives which were initially formed by the British historians in colonial India and then continued by specific nationalist historians of India and Pakistan, after the independence of the two nation-states. By citing some of the most popular misconceptions surrounding the two Mughal Emperors, this study attempts to understand the policies of these two emperors in a wider socio-political narrative and attempts to deconstruct these ‘convenient’ misinterpretations. Concluding the analysis of how these two emperors are viewed differently in both India and Pakistan, the paper asserts the importance of leaving behind the modern concepts of 'liberal versus conservative' while understanding these emperors and reinforces the practice to understand these historical figures on their own terms.
Title: Reimagining the Mughal Emperors Akbar and Aurangzeb in the 21st Century
Description:
The paper focuses on the reigns and policies of the two Mughal Emperors, Akbar and Aurangzeb, and analyses how they have been remembered in the wider social memory.
While Akbar is glorified as a 'secular' and 'liberal' leader, Aurangzeb is often dismissed and ridiculed as a 'religious bigot', who tried to impose the Shari'ah law in diversified India.
The paper traces and evaluates the construction of these two grand narratives which were initially formed by the British historians in colonial India and then continued by specific nationalist historians of India and Pakistan, after the independence of the two nation-states.
By citing some of the most popular misconceptions surrounding the two Mughal Emperors, this study attempts to understand the policies of these two emperors in a wider socio-political narrative and attempts to deconstruct these ‘convenient’ misinterpretations.
Concluding the analysis of how these two emperors are viewed differently in both India and Pakistan, the paper asserts the importance of leaving behind the modern concepts of 'liberal versus conservative' while understanding these emperors and reinforces the practice to understand these historical figures on their own terms.
.
Related Results
Reassessing the Role and Status of the Diwan al-Sadarat within the Mughal State under Aurangzeb (1658-1707)
Reassessing the Role and Status of the Diwan al-Sadarat within the Mughal State under Aurangzeb (1658-1707)
Abstract
The effectiveness of the Mughal Empire’s governance in India was supported by the role played by each department or diwan. One of the important diwan was the Diwan al-Sada...
Aurangzeb Beyond Orthodoxy: Veena Player and Calligrapher and the Politics of Mughal Aesthetics
Aurangzeb Beyond Orthodoxy: Veena Player and Calligrapher and the Politics of Mughal Aesthetics
Aurangzeb Alamgir (r. 1658–1707), the sixth emperor of the Mughal dynasty, has long held a central and contested place in the historiography of South Asia. Celebrated by some as a ...
The Reflection of Sufi Influence on the Mughal Empire (1526-1857): A Spiritual and Cultural Analysis
The Reflection of Sufi Influence on the Mughal Empire (1526-1857): A Spiritual and Cultural Analysis
This article examines the role of Mughal emperors in promoting Sufism and their contributions to the religious, social, and economic development of the Indian subcontinent during t...
A Study of Relations between Mughal India and the Ottoman Empire 1556-1748
A Study of Relations between Mughal India and the Ottoman Empire 1556-1748
In India, relationship with Ottoman was not found until the foundation of the Mughal empire in the early sixteenth century that India was able to break this self-imposed isolation ...
MUGHAL GARDENS IN KASHMIR: A REVIEW
MUGHAL GARDENS IN KASHMIR: A REVIEW
Mughal Gardens are a type of gardens built by the Mughal emperors following the Persian Empire. Which represents earthly management. The rulers of the Mughal Empire took care of ga...
Jain Elites and the Mughal State under Shahjahan
Jain Elites and the Mughal State under Shahjahan
This article is an attempt to analyse the double-edged social relationship between the merchant communities and the state beyond the technicalities of the economic considerations. ...
Mughal State and the Information System: 1556–1707
Mughal State and the Information System: 1556–1707
News reporting was an essential part of the administration of the Mughal Empire. Many sources such as biography, autobiography, court chronicles, akhbarat and travelogues indicate ...
Aurangzeb as seen from Gujarat: Shi‘i and Millenarian Challenges to Mughal Sovereignty
Aurangzeb as seen from Gujarat: Shi‘i and Millenarian Challenges to Mughal Sovereignty
AbstractThis article argues for a re-evaluation of the ‘Islamist’ policies of the Mughal ruler Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir (r. 1658–1707), many of which were arguably harsher towards Shi‘i ...

