Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

FEMOSEAL CLOSE: multi-centre observational study with FemoSeal™ vascular closure device following peripheral percutaneous endovascular procedures

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background The purpose of the FEMOSEAL CLOSE study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of FemoSeal™ vascular closure device in achieving haemostasis following transfemoral peripheral procedures in routine clinical practice. Materials and methods This prospective, European, multi-centre, single-arm, post-market clinical follow-up study enrolled patients undergoing diagnostic or interventional peripheral endovascular procedures with FemoSeal™ vascular closure device in inpatient or outpatient settings. The primary endpoint was a composite of safety and effectiveness, with effectiveness defined as cessation of arterial bleeding without adjunctive treatment, and safety as freedom from major vascular complications in the first 6 h. Secondary endpoints included: minor access-site complications and major complications 6 h to 30 days post-procedure, and time to haemostasis, ambulation and discharge. Quality of life was assessed at baseline, discharge and 30-day follow-up. Device usability was also surveyed. Results Between December 2021 and July 2022, 230 patients were enrolled in three European centres. The primary composite endpoint was achieved in 95.1% (215/226) [95% confidence interval: 91.46–97.55] of patients. The effectiveness component was achieved in 96.9% (219/226) [95% confidence interval: 93.70–98.70], and the safety component in 95.2% (220/230) [95% confidence interval: 92.15–97.90] of patients. FemoSeal™ vascular closure device deployment failure occurred in 1.6% (4/230) of cases, with subsequent manual compression achieving haemostasis. The median time to haemostasis was 0.42 min. Conclusions The study device provides effective haemostasis and low rates of access-site complications up to 30 days post-procedure for patients undergoing peripheral endovascular interventions. It demonstrates good performance with rapid haemostasis. Trial registration The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. (ClinicalTrials identifier: NCT05027698).
Title: FEMOSEAL CLOSE: multi-centre observational study with FemoSeal™ vascular closure device following peripheral percutaneous endovascular procedures
Description:
Abstract Background The purpose of the FEMOSEAL CLOSE study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of FemoSeal™ vascular closure device in achieving haemostasis following transfemoral peripheral procedures in routine clinical practice.
Materials and methods This prospective, European, multi-centre, single-arm, post-market clinical follow-up study enrolled patients undergoing diagnostic or interventional peripheral endovascular procedures with FemoSeal™ vascular closure device in inpatient or outpatient settings.
The primary endpoint was a composite of safety and effectiveness, with effectiveness defined as cessation of arterial bleeding without adjunctive treatment, and safety as freedom from major vascular complications in the first 6 h.
Secondary endpoints included: minor access-site complications and major complications 6 h to 30 days post-procedure, and time to haemostasis, ambulation and discharge.
Quality of life was assessed at baseline, discharge and 30-day follow-up.
Device usability was also surveyed.
Results Between December 2021 and July 2022, 230 patients were enrolled in three European centres.
The primary composite endpoint was achieved in 95.
1% (215/226) [95% confidence interval: 91.
46–97.
55] of patients.
The effectiveness component was achieved in 96.
9% (219/226) [95% confidence interval: 93.
70–98.
70], and the safety component in 95.
2% (220/230) [95% confidence interval: 92.
15–97.
90] of patients.
FemoSeal™ vascular closure device deployment failure occurred in 1.
6% (4/230) of cases, with subsequent manual compression achieving haemostasis.
The median time to haemostasis was 0.
42 min.
Conclusions The study device provides effective haemostasis and low rates of access-site complications up to 30 days post-procedure for patients undergoing peripheral endovascular interventions.
It demonstrates good performance with rapid haemostasis.
Trial registration The study is registered at clinicaltrials.
gov.
(ClinicalTrials identifier: NCT05027698).

Related Results

Early Onset of Coronary Subclavian Steal Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review
Early Onset of Coronary Subclavian Steal Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Coronary subclavian steal syndrome (CSSS) is a rare phenomenon that often goes undiagnosed and causes severe complications, including death. This report prese...
Deciphering Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Patient Diversity: Insights From a Cluster Analysis of the POPART Registry
Deciphering Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Patient Diversity: Insights From a Cluster Analysis of the POPART Registry
Background Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) are the most common peripheral aneurysm. However, due to its rarity, the cumulative body of evidence regarding patient patt...
Osoby niejednokrotnie przebywające w izbie wytrzeźwień
Osoby niejednokrotnie przebywające w izbie wytrzeźwień
In Poland we have at present in towns 29 detoxication centres with 1,226 beds; people found by the police in public places in a state of intoxication are more and more often taken ...
ONE- VERSUS TWO-LAYER CLOSURE AT CESAREAN BIRTH
ONE- VERSUS TWO-LAYER CLOSURE AT CESAREAN BIRTH
Background: Cesarean delivery is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide. The technique of uterine closure plays a significant role in postoperative recove...
Endovascular biometrics and engineering
Endovascular biometrics and engineering
Aim. To study technical problems in the provision of endovascular care and to develop technological solutions for its improvement based on endovascular biometry. Methods. For...
Comparison of Closure versus Non-closure of Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvesting Site in Urethroplasty.
Comparison of Closure versus Non-closure of Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvesting Site in Urethroplasty.
Background: Buccal mucosal graft is commonly used in substitution urethroplasty for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures. However, the optimal management of the donor site...

Back to Top