Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Influence of row spacing and harvest date on Cephalaria joppensis performance as a forage crop

View through CrossRef
AbstractCephalaria joppensis Rchb. (CJ) has recently been domesticated as a new forage crop in Israel. Feeding trials with dairy cows and sheep have shown that CJ silage can replace wheat silage for these animals. The current work tested the effect of row spacing on the growth, yield, chemical composition and digestibility of CJ for forage. Two field trials were performed at a research farm in Acre to test three row spacings: (T1) 16 cm between rows (narrow row spacing), (T2) pairs of adjacent (16 cm apart) rows with 32 cm spacing between pairs (alternated row spacing) and (T3) 32 cm between rows (wide row spacing). T1 row spacing had the advantage of a better area coverage rate, which may be beneficial at the beginning of growth, reflected by the rapid establishment of the plants in the field, as well as in the competition with weeds. The growth rate was more significant in T2 and T3 row spacings. In the first year, a higher yield was obtained for T2 and T3 row spacings; in the second year, no differences in yield were found among the row spacing treatments. Row spacing did not affect the plant’s digestibility or chemical nutrition for ruminants. There was no uniformity in plant quality among the cultivars between the two years. Thus, we should define the phenological stages of Cephalaria joppensis and their relationship to nutritional quality at different sites having different climate conditions, in both small and semi-commercial plots.
Title: Influence of row spacing and harvest date on Cephalaria joppensis performance as a forage crop
Description:
AbstractCephalaria joppensis Rchb.
(CJ) has recently been domesticated as a new forage crop in Israel.
Feeding trials with dairy cows and sheep have shown that CJ silage can replace wheat silage for these animals.
The current work tested the effect of row spacing on the growth, yield, chemical composition and digestibility of CJ for forage.
Two field trials were performed at a research farm in Acre to test three row spacings: (T1) 16 cm between rows (narrow row spacing), (T2) pairs of adjacent (16 cm apart) rows with 32 cm spacing between pairs (alternated row spacing) and (T3) 32 cm between rows (wide row spacing).
T1 row spacing had the advantage of a better area coverage rate, which may be beneficial at the beginning of growth, reflected by the rapid establishment of the plants in the field, as well as in the competition with weeds.
The growth rate was more significant in T2 and T3 row spacings.
In the first year, a higher yield was obtained for T2 and T3 row spacings; in the second year, no differences in yield were found among the row spacing treatments.
Row spacing did not affect the plant’s digestibility or chemical nutrition for ruminants.
There was no uniformity in plant quality among the cultivars between the two years.
Thus, we should define the phenological stages of Cephalaria joppensis and their relationship to nutritional quality at different sites having different climate conditions, in both small and semi-commercial plots.

Related Results

Row Orientation and Planting Pattern of Relay Intercropped Soybean and Wheat
Row Orientation and Planting Pattern of Relay Intercropped Soybean and Wheat
Relay intercropping soybean [Glycine max(L.) Merr.] into winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) may increase soybean yields compared with doublecropping. Once the soybean crop is esta...
Evaluating Intercropping Limitations of Cowpea (Vignaunguiculata L.), Pearl Millet (Pennisetumglaucum L.), and Maize (Zea Mays L.)
Evaluating Intercropping Limitations of Cowpea (Vignaunguiculata L.), Pearl Millet (Pennisetumglaucum L.), and Maize (Zea Mays L.)
Fodder scarcity is a main problem in boosting of livestock sector. Hypothesis was made in order to increase fodder yield per unit of land by intercropping of cowpeas, pearl millet ...
INFLUENCE OF ROW SPACING ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF MAIZE HYBRIDS OF DIFFERENT MATURITY GROUPS
INFLUENCE OF ROW SPACING ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF MAIZE HYBRIDS OF DIFFERENT MATURITY GROUPS
Growing corn is a complex process, the success of which depends on compliance with the cultivation technology. Increasing the productivity of modern maize hybrids without incurring...
Potential of Spring Barley, Oat and Triticale Intercrops with Field Peas for Forage Production, Nutrition Quality and Beef Cattle Diet
Potential of Spring Barley, Oat and Triticale Intercrops with Field Peas for Forage Production, Nutrition Quality and Beef Cattle Diet
Spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), oat (Avena sativa L.) and triticale (x Triticosecale Wittmack) monocrops and their intercrops with two forage varieties (40-10 and Tucker) and o...

Back to Top