Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Finite Element Modeling Strategies for Dynamic Aircraft Seats
View through CrossRef
<div class="htmlview paragraph">Dynamic aircraft seat regulations are identified in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 14 CFR Parts § 23.562 [<span class="xref">1</span>] and § 25.562 [<span class="xref">2</span>] for crashworthy evaluation of a seat in dynamic environment. The regulations specify full-scale dynamic testing on production seats. The dynamic tests are designed to demonstrate the structural integrity of the seat to withstand an emergency landing event and occupant safety. SAE standard AS 8049 [<span class="xref">3</span>] supports detailed information on dynamic seat testing procedure and acceptance criteria. Full-scale dynamic testing in support of certification is expensive and repeated testing due to failure drastically increases the expense. Involvement of impact environment, flexibility in interior configuration and complicated nature of seat engineering design makes this problem quite complex, so that classical hand calculations are practically impossible. Efforts have been made to improve the occupant safety and to reduce the testing costs through substantiation via computer modeling analysis techniques.</div>
<div class="htmlview paragraph">The goal of the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) in product development is not only to design a seat but to substantiate the certification tests or possibly replace the certification tests. The case of a certification by substantiation tests increases the necessity of validation of the Finite Element (FE) model. Advisory Circular (AC) 20-146 [<span class="xref">4</span>] demonstrates the methodology for dynamic seat “Certification By Analysis” for use in Parts 23, 25, 27 and 29 airplanes and rotorcraft. This AC provides guidance on how to validate the computer model and under what conditions the model may be used in support of certification or Technical Standard Order (TSO) approval/ authorization.</div>
<div class="htmlview paragraph">In this study, best FE modeling practices for dynamic aircraft seats are presented using explicit nonlinear FE code such as LS-DYNA [<span class="xref">5</span>, <span class="xref">6</span>] with a brief case study of an aircraft passenger seat. Comparison of FEA results and test results indicate reasonable correlations, establishing confidence in the Dynamic Finite Element Analysis (DFEA) methodology.</div>
<div class="htmlview paragraph">Development in DFEA methodology helps aircraft industry in designing and certifying dynamic seats and interior configurations more economically and confidently. Objective of this paper is to provide simple guidelines for the aircraft seating industry in developing simulation techniques for the dynamic environment.</div>
Title: Finite Element Modeling Strategies for Dynamic Aircraft Seats
Description:
<div class="htmlview paragraph">Dynamic aircraft seat regulations are identified in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 14 CFR Parts § 23.
562 [<span class="xref">1</span>] and § 25.
562 [<span class="xref">2</span>] for crashworthy evaluation of a seat in dynamic environment.
The regulations specify full-scale dynamic testing on production seats.
The dynamic tests are designed to demonstrate the structural integrity of the seat to withstand an emergency landing event and occupant safety.
SAE standard AS 8049 [<span class="xref">3</span>] supports detailed information on dynamic seat testing procedure and acceptance criteria.
Full-scale dynamic testing in support of certification is expensive and repeated testing due to failure drastically increases the expense.
Involvement of impact environment, flexibility in interior configuration and complicated nature of seat engineering design makes this problem quite complex, so that classical hand calculations are practically impossible.
Efforts have been made to improve the occupant safety and to reduce the testing costs through substantiation via computer modeling analysis techniques.
</div>
<div class="htmlview paragraph">The goal of the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) in product development is not only to design a seat but to substantiate the certification tests or possibly replace the certification tests.
The case of a certification by substantiation tests increases the necessity of validation of the Finite Element (FE) model.
Advisory Circular (AC) 20-146 [<span class="xref">4</span>] demonstrates the methodology for dynamic seat “Certification By Analysis” for use in Parts 23, 25, 27 and 29 airplanes and rotorcraft.
This AC provides guidance on how to validate the computer model and under what conditions the model may be used in support of certification or Technical Standard Order (TSO) approval/ authorization.
</div>
<div class="htmlview paragraph">In this study, best FE modeling practices for dynamic aircraft seats are presented using explicit nonlinear FE code such as LS-DYNA [<span class="xref">5</span>, <span class="xref">6</span>] with a brief case study of an aircraft passenger seat.
Comparison of FEA results and test results indicate reasonable correlations, establishing confidence in the Dynamic Finite Element Analysis (DFEA) methodology.
</div>
<div class="htmlview paragraph">Development in DFEA methodology helps aircraft industry in designing and certifying dynamic seats and interior configurations more economically and confidently.
Objective of this paper is to provide simple guidelines for the aircraft seating industry in developing simulation techniques for the dynamic environment.
</div>.
Related Results
Aircraft Precipitation Static Certification
Aircraft Precipitation Static Certification
<div class="section abstract">
<div class="htmlview paragraph">Aircraft surface precipitation static (p-static) charge can be generated when aircraft fly through ice ...
Session 5: Integration / certification
Session 5: Integration / certification
**Chair: Moti Karpel (Technion)**
Integration & certification of high aspect ratio wings and enabling technologies
...
Closed-loop identification for aircraft flutter model parameters
Closed-loop identification for aircraft flutter model parameters
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to extend the authors’ previous contributions on aircraft flutter model parameters identification. Because closed-loop condition is more widely...
An Differential Quadrature Finite Element and the Differential Quadrature Hierarchical Finite Element Methods for the Dynamics Analysis of on Board Shaft
An Differential Quadrature Finite Element and the Differential Quadrature Hierarchical Finite Element Methods for the Dynamics Analysis of on Board Shaft
In this paper the dynamic analysis of a shaft rotor whose support is mobile is studied. For the calculation of kinetic energy and stiffness energy, the beam theory of Euler Bernoul...
Contrail-Aware Aircraft Design Optimization: A Comparative Study of Kerosene and LH2 Aircraft
Contrail-Aware Aircraft Design Optimization: A Comparative Study of Kerosene and LH2 Aircraft
Aviation is one of the most rapidly growing contributors to anthropogenic climate change, driven not only by carbon emissions but also by non-carbon effects such as contrail-induce...
Nonlinear geometric multivariable control for unmanned aircraft flight system
Nonlinear geometric multivariable control for unmanned aircraft flight system
Purpose
Due to the important role of unmanned aircraft in military and human’s normal practical application, this paper aims to extend the interesting research ...
Assessment of Cargo Space Seating Performance in Pave Hawk and Black Hawk Aircraft
Assessment of Cargo Space Seating Performance in Pave Hawk and Black Hawk Aircraft
Operational mishap data shows that helicopter cabin passengers are more likely to have major or fatal injuries than pilots. The purpose of this study was to compare occupant protec...
Market and Technological Perspectives for the New Generation of Regional Passenger Aircraft
Market and Technological Perspectives for the New Generation of Regional Passenger Aircraft
This article describes the extent to which hybrid aircraft and all-electric aircraft can present a solution for reducing HC, CO, and NO x emissions and noise in the vicinit...

