Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Freud, Bose, and the “Maternal Deity”
View through CrossRef
Chapter 5 treats Bose’s discussion of “the sources of the maternal deity” by which, conjointly with his treatment of “the Oedipus mother,” he challenged Freud in a 1929 letter. The key text is Bose’s “Psychological Outlook of Indian Philosophy,” a 1930 address to the Indian Philosophical Association. Here Bose juxtaposes two approaches to deity. First, he cites Freudian projection theory, leaving open what a projection theory of “the sources of the maternal deity” would look like, but implies that it would be equally childish. He then turns to methods of envisioning devatās or “divinities,” and recalls debates over “what is a devatā” that were carried out between the philosophical schools of Mīmāṃsa and Vedānta in the early classical period. Thus a sophisticated, mature, and unchildish way of defining the sources of maternal deity emerges.
Title: Freud, Bose, and the “Maternal Deity”
Description:
Chapter 5 treats Bose’s discussion of “the sources of the maternal deity” by which, conjointly with his treatment of “the Oedipus mother,” he challenged Freud in a 1929 letter.
The key text is Bose’s “Psychological Outlook of Indian Philosophy,” a 1930 address to the Indian Philosophical Association.
Here Bose juxtaposes two approaches to deity.
First, he cites Freudian projection theory, leaving open what a projection theory of “the sources of the maternal deity” would look like, but implies that it would be equally childish.
He then turns to methods of envisioning devatās or “divinities,” and recalls debates over “what is a devatā” that were carried out between the philosophical schools of Mīmāṃsa and Vedānta in the early classical period.
Thus a sophisticated, mature, and unchildish way of defining the sources of maternal deity emerges.
Related Results
Restoration of the Bose–Freud Correspondence
Restoration of the Bose–Freud Correspondence
Chapter 2 compares the second phase of the Bose–Freud correspondence with the first two periods of Freud’s correspondence with Romain Rolland. Freud’s preference for Oedipal insigh...
Introduction
Introduction
Chapter 1 compares Freud and Bose biographically: their childhoods, early psychoanalytic discoveries, marriages, residences, careers, founding of psychoanalytic movements in Europe...
Freud's Mahābhārata
Freud's Mahābhārata
This book has a three-part structure, with the first and last chapters being the first and third parts, respectively. Chapter 1 examines Freud’s essay “The ‘Uncanny,’ ” and works b...
The Oedipus Mother
The Oedipus Mother
Chapter 6 complements chapter 5 as a discussion of what Bose means by the Oedipus mother. Bose’s joint-parental image positions the mother as pre-Oedipal at her source in the secon...
Opposite Wishes
Opposite Wishes
The first of the book’s next three chapters that deal with concepts of Bose by which he sought to challenge Freud in their letters, chapter 4 addresses Bose’s signature theory of o...
Subordinate-Deity Models of Ultimate Reality
Subordinate-Deity Models of Ultimate Reality
Subordinate-deity models of ultimate reality affirm that God is Highest Being within an ultimate reality that is neither conceptually tractable nor religiously relevant. Subordinat...
Sigmund Freud
Sigmund Freud
Can Freud be abandoned? Interrelations between sacer, ambivalence, exception, suspension, property, use and civil war around the origin of law are traces of Freud that manifest the...

