Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Risk Assessment Method for Bullheading Killing Based on the Uncertainty of Formation Parameters

View through CrossRef
Abstract To analyze the risks caused by the uncertainty of formation parameters to bullheading killing, a method for quantitatively evaluating the bullheading killing risks is established. Firstly, considering the influence of gas invasion volume, formation fracture, and killing parameters, a bullheading killing model is established based on a gas-liquid two-phase flow. Then, the uncertainties of formation parameters (formation pressure and permeability) are quantified. Based on the shut-in wellhead information, the range of formation pressure is predicted with the gas column model and multiphase flow model. Considering the influence of formation fracture on the permeability, Monte Carlo random sampling is applied to predict the range of formation permeability. Based on industry standards, a safety pressure value is set up, and the wellbore pressure corresponding to all value combinations of formation parameters under the given killing parameters is obtained by killing model. Moreover, according to the probability and degree that wellbore pressure exceeds the safety value, the risks are rated to quantify the risk of bullheading killing. Under this circumstance, the feasibility and accuracy of this method are validated by practical cases, and it is found by simulation that flow rate can affect the risk of wellhead damage to the greatest extent, and there exists a critical rate. When the flow rate is greater than the critical rate, the increase in flow rate will greatly improve the risk probability. In such case, improving the density of kill fluid can reduce the risk of wellhead damage in a limited way, but it will greatly increase the risks of formation fracture and casing damage. Therefore, for bullheading killing, it is not advisable to employ high-density kill fluid. By this method, the bullheading killing risks can be fully assessed before actual construction, thus providing reference for determining reasonable construction parameters of bullheading killing.
Title: Risk Assessment Method for Bullheading Killing Based on the Uncertainty of Formation Parameters
Description:
Abstract To analyze the risks caused by the uncertainty of formation parameters to bullheading killing, a method for quantitatively evaluating the bullheading killing risks is established.
Firstly, considering the influence of gas invasion volume, formation fracture, and killing parameters, a bullheading killing model is established based on a gas-liquid two-phase flow.
Then, the uncertainties of formation parameters (formation pressure and permeability) are quantified.
Based on the shut-in wellhead information, the range of formation pressure is predicted with the gas column model and multiphase flow model.
Considering the influence of formation fracture on the permeability, Monte Carlo random sampling is applied to predict the range of formation permeability.
Based on industry standards, a safety pressure value is set up, and the wellbore pressure corresponding to all value combinations of formation parameters under the given killing parameters is obtained by killing model.
Moreover, according to the probability and degree that wellbore pressure exceeds the safety value, the risks are rated to quantify the risk of bullheading killing.
Under this circumstance, the feasibility and accuracy of this method are validated by practical cases, and it is found by simulation that flow rate can affect the risk of wellhead damage to the greatest extent, and there exists a critical rate.
When the flow rate is greater than the critical rate, the increase in flow rate will greatly improve the risk probability.
In such case, improving the density of kill fluid can reduce the risk of wellhead damage in a limited way, but it will greatly increase the risks of formation fracture and casing damage.
Therefore, for bullheading killing, it is not advisable to employ high-density kill fluid.
By this method, the bullheading killing risks can be fully assessed before actual construction, thus providing reference for determining reasonable construction parameters of bullheading killing.

Related Results

New Perspectives for 3D Visualization of Dynamic Reservoir Uncertainty
New Perspectives for 3D Visualization of Dynamic Reservoir Uncertainty
This reference is for an abstract only. A full paper was not submitted for this conference. Abstract 1 Int...
Reserves Uncertainty Calculation Accounting for Parameter Uncertainty
Reserves Uncertainty Calculation Accounting for Parameter Uncertainty
Abstract An important goal of geostatistical modeling is to assess output uncertainty after processing realizations through a transfer function, in particular, to...
The uncertainty–investment relationship: scrutinizing the role of firm size
The uncertainty–investment relationship: scrutinizing the role of firm size
PurposeThe objective of this paper is threefold. First, it aims to empirically study whether firm-specific/idiosyncratic uncertainty, macroeconomic/aggregate uncertainty and politi...
Sampling Space of Uncertainty Through Stochastic Modelling of Geological Facies
Sampling Space of Uncertainty Through Stochastic Modelling of Geological Facies
Abstract The way the space of uncertainty should be sampled from reservoir models is an essential point for discussion that can have a major impact on the assessm...
Studies on Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses for SCOPE and WAFT With Uncertainty Propagation Methods
Studies on Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses for SCOPE and WAFT With Uncertainty Propagation Methods
The purpose of Steam condensation on cold plate experiment facility (SCOPE) and Water film test (WAFT) is to verify the steam condensation and water film evaporation correlation wi...
Abstract 1636: TNF-driven paracrine killing determines the cytotoxic efficacy of Teclistamab in Myeloma
Abstract 1636: TNF-driven paracrine killing determines the cytotoxic efficacy of Teclistamab in Myeloma
Abstract Multiple Myeloma is the second most common hematologic malignancy among US adults and remains incurable. Immunotherapies, including bispecific T cell eng...
Impact of Common Anticoagulants on Complete Blood Count Parameters Among Humans
Impact of Common Anticoagulants on Complete Blood Count Parameters Among Humans
Abstract Introduction Among the most frequently used anticoagulants in hematological testing are tetra-acetic acid (EDTA), sodium citrate, and sodium heparin. However, there is a n...

Back to Top