Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Magnitude, associated factors of difficult airway, and predictive value of airway examinations among maxillofacial surgery patients at public hospitals in Southern Ethiopia: a multicentre cross-sectional study

View through CrossRef
Background: “Difficult airway” is the clinical situation in which a conventionally trained anesthesiologist experiences difficulty with mask ventilation, laryngoscopy, and difficulty with tracheal intubation, or both. Associated factors and predictive value difficult airways, maxillofacial surgery study setup is under studied. Objective: To determine the magnitude and associated factors of difficult airways and predictive value of airway examinations among adult patients who underwent maxillofacial surgery at public hospitals in Southern Ethiopia 2022. Methods and materials: An institutional-based multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among 250 maxillofacial patients from March to 30 June 2022 at selected hospitals. The data were entered into Epi_Data software version 4.3 and analyzed by STATA software version 14. All variables that were statistically significant in bivariate analysis, at the P less than 0.25, were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The predictive value or the effectiveness of airway examinations in predicting difficult airways was analyzed by receiver operating curve. Results: In the current study, the magnitude of difficult airways was 21.2% (95% CI = 16.3–26.1%) and the magnitude of difficult intubation, difficult laryngoscopy, and difficult mask ventilation was 6.4% (95% CI 3.3–9.4%), 9.6% (95% CI 6.1–13%), and 13.6% (95% CI (9.1–16.8%), respectively. History of head and neck surgery adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=6.3, 95% CI (2.85–14.34), cervical collar AOR=4.9, 95% CI (1.96–12.49), and cervical spine injury AOR=2.4, 95% CI (1.07–5.38) were independently and significantly associated with difficulty of airway. Modified Mallampati class and sternomental distance were identified as good preoperative tests to predict difficult laryngoscopy, intubation, and mask ventilation. Conclusion and recommendation: The magnitude of difficult airways was maxillofacial surgery. Among various airway assessment tests, no single test was perfectly accurate. Anaesthesia professionals are recommended to use a combination of preoperative airway assessments.
Title: Magnitude, associated factors of difficult airway, and predictive value of airway examinations among maxillofacial surgery patients at public hospitals in Southern Ethiopia: a multicentre cross-sectional study
Description:
Background: “Difficult airway” is the clinical situation in which a conventionally trained anesthesiologist experiences difficulty with mask ventilation, laryngoscopy, and difficulty with tracheal intubation, or both.
Associated factors and predictive value difficult airways, maxillofacial surgery study setup is under studied.
Objective: To determine the magnitude and associated factors of difficult airways and predictive value of airway examinations among adult patients who underwent maxillofacial surgery at public hospitals in Southern Ethiopia 2022.
Methods and materials: An institutional-based multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among 250 maxillofacial patients from March to 30 June 2022 at selected hospitals.
The data were entered into Epi_Data software version 4.
3 and analyzed by STATA software version 14.
All variables that were statistically significant in bivariate analysis, at the P less than 0.
25, were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis.
The predictive value or the effectiveness of airway examinations in predicting difficult airways was analyzed by receiver operating curve.
Results: In the current study, the magnitude of difficult airways was 21.
2% (95% CI = 16.
3–26.
1%) and the magnitude of difficult intubation, difficult laryngoscopy, and difficult mask ventilation was 6.
4% (95% CI 3.
3–9.
4%), 9.
6% (95% CI 6.
1–13%), and 13.
6% (95% CI (9.
1–16.
8%), respectively.
History of head and neck surgery adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=6.
3, 95% CI (2.
85–14.
34), cervical collar AOR=4.
9, 95% CI (1.
96–12.
49), and cervical spine injury AOR=2.
4, 95% CI (1.
07–5.
38) were independently and significantly associated with difficulty of airway.
Modified Mallampati class and sternomental distance were identified as good preoperative tests to predict difficult laryngoscopy, intubation, and mask ventilation.
Conclusion and recommendation: The magnitude of difficult airways was maxillofacial surgery.
Among various airway assessment tests, no single test was perfectly accurate.
Anaesthesia professionals are recommended to use a combination of preoperative airway assessments.

Related Results

DIFFICULT AIRWAY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN KARACHI’S TERTIARY CARE HOSPITALS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS
DIFFICULT AIRWAY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN KARACHI’S TERTIARY CARE HOSPITALS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS
Background: Effective management of difficult airways is essential in anesthesia practice, particularly in critical “cannot intubate, cannot ventilate” (CICV) situations, which can...
Pediatric Difficult Airway Management: Assessment and Intervention
Pediatric Difficult Airway Management: Assessment and Intervention
Background : Pediatric airways exemplify the adage that children are not merely small adults. Their airway anatomical differences are markedly different than th...
A clinical survey of the current status of difficult airway information dissemination
A clinical survey of the current status of difficult airway information dissemination
Abstract Background Difficult airway is one of the greatest challenges faced by anesthesiologists and is a potential risk factor for increased fatality in patients. To date...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...

Back to Top