Javascript must be enabled to continue!
P280 Concomitant use of ivabradine and cyp3a4 inhibitors in critical cardiac patients
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
In recent years there have been warnings concerning drug-induced life-threatening arrhythmias. Drug interactions can increase the risk of QT interval prolongation via interaction of pharmacokinetic mechanism. Some drugs such as Ivabradine does not affect the repolarization or affect the QT interval themselves. However, it can increase the risk of QT prolongation when taken with drugs that block the metabolic breakdown which inhibit the CYP3A4 enzyme particularly. Predisposing factors of QT prolongation include female sex, age over 65 years, brady-arrhythmia, electrolyte disturbances (hypokalemia, hypomagnesaemia), cardiac disease (congestive heart failure, ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation), impaired hepatic/renal function and hypothyroidism.
Purpose
To assess potential Ivabradine – CYP3A4 inhibitor interactions in a Cardiac Critical Care Unit (CCCU).
Method
We prospectively observed patients admitted at CCCU received Ivabradine and CYP3A4 inhibitor (QTprolonging agent) concomitantlyfrom Feb 2018 to July 2018 at National Heart Institute, Malaysia. We use a clinical drug decision support system (CDDSS) to identify the potential drug-drug interactions (PDDI) and assessed the likelihood of drug - drug interactions (DDI) using Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIPS).
Results
Patients admitted at CCCU co-administered with Ivabradine and CYP3A4 inhibitors (amiodarone/azithromycin) were analyzed. The severity level for both potential Ivabradine – Azithromycin and Ivabradine – Amiodarone interactions were alerted by the CDDSS as Major. Total 10 (M = 70%) patients were screened. The mean age was ± 57 years old. They had no previous exposure to both or one of the medications before. All patients had underlying cardiac disease. The left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) ranged from 15% - 65%. Adverse drug event (ADE) occurred in 7 (70%) patients [Male = 5 (71%), Female = 2 (67%)]. 70% of patients had prolonged QT interval induced by Ivabradine – Amiodarone and Ivabradine – Azithromycin All patients had QTc interval < 500 ms before co-administration and had a change of ± 100 ms after coadministration. The onset of ADE ranged from day 2 to day 5 in all patients. One had life threatening arrhythmia; ventricular fibrillation and require defibrillator and another one patient had non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. The most common precipitating factor was underlying cardiac disease. All suspected precipitating drug was discontinued. DIPS revealed; 57% patients scored 9 points (highly probable DDI) and the rest scored between 5-7 points (probable DDI).
Conclusion
Ivabradine potentially associated to fatal arrhythmia when it is co-administered with CYP3A4 inhibitor. Hence, the physician should reconsider such combination within the correct clinical context to avoid cardiovascular deterioration especially in a critical care setting.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: P280 Concomitant use of ivabradine and cyp3a4 inhibitors in critical cardiac patients
Description:
Abstract
Background
In recent years there have been warnings concerning drug-induced life-threatening arrhythmias.
Drug interactions can increase the risk of QT interval prolongation via interaction of pharmacokinetic mechanism.
Some drugs such as Ivabradine does not affect the repolarization or affect the QT interval themselves.
However, it can increase the risk of QT prolongation when taken with drugs that block the metabolic breakdown which inhibit the CYP3A4 enzyme particularly.
Predisposing factors of QT prolongation include female sex, age over 65 years, brady-arrhythmia, electrolyte disturbances (hypokalemia, hypomagnesaemia), cardiac disease (congestive heart failure, ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation), impaired hepatic/renal function and hypothyroidism.
Purpose
To assess potential Ivabradine – CYP3A4 inhibitor interactions in a Cardiac Critical Care Unit (CCCU).
Method
We prospectively observed patients admitted at CCCU received Ivabradine and CYP3A4 inhibitor (QTprolonging agent) concomitantlyfrom Feb 2018 to July 2018 at National Heart Institute, Malaysia.
We use a clinical drug decision support system (CDDSS) to identify the potential drug-drug interactions (PDDI) and assessed the likelihood of drug - drug interactions (DDI) using Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIPS).
Results
Patients admitted at CCCU co-administered with Ivabradine and CYP3A4 inhibitors (amiodarone/azithromycin) were analyzed.
The severity level for both potential Ivabradine – Azithromycin and Ivabradine – Amiodarone interactions were alerted by the CDDSS as Major.
Total 10 (M = 70%) patients were screened.
The mean age was ± 57 years old.
They had no previous exposure to both or one of the medications before.
All patients had underlying cardiac disease.
The left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) ranged from 15% - 65%.
Adverse drug event (ADE) occurred in 7 (70%) patients [Male = 5 (71%), Female = 2 (67%)].
70% of patients had prolonged QT interval induced by Ivabradine – Amiodarone and Ivabradine – Azithromycin All patients had QTc interval < 500 ms before co-administration and had a change of ± 100 ms after coadministration.
The onset of ADE ranged from day 2 to day 5 in all patients.
One had life threatening arrhythmia; ventricular fibrillation and require defibrillator and another one patient had non-sustained ventricular tachycardia.
The most common precipitating factor was underlying cardiac disease.
All suspected precipitating drug was discontinued.
DIPS revealed; 57% patients scored 9 points (highly probable DDI) and the rest scored between 5-7 points (probable DDI).
Conclusion
Ivabradine potentially associated to fatal arrhythmia when it is co-administered with CYP3A4 inhibitor.
Hence, the physician should reconsider such combination within the correct clinical context to avoid cardiovascular deterioration especially in a critical care setting.
Related Results
COMPARISON OF ORAL IVABRADINE AND METOPROLOL FOR CONTROL OF HEART RATE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CT CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY
COMPARISON OF ORAL IVABRADINE AND METOPROLOL FOR CONTROL OF HEART RATE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CT CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY
Objectives
Optimisation of heart rate (HR) to limit motion artefacts is mandatory in all patients undergoing CT coronary angiography (CTCA). Despite use of β-bloc...
CYP3A Genotypes in Bangladeshi Tuberculosis Patients
CYP3A Genotypes in Bangladeshi Tuberculosis Patients
The purpose of this study is to investigate the genotype and allelic frequencies of CYP3A in Bangladeshi Tuberculosis (TB) patients which may help for individualized drug dosing an...
Ivabradine Attenuates the Microcirculatory Derangements Evoked by Experimental Sepsis
Ivabradine Attenuates the Microcirculatory Derangements Evoked by Experimental Sepsis
Abstract
Background
Experimental data suggest that ivabradine, an inhibitor of the pacemaker current in sinoatrial node, exerts beneficial effect...
Inadekvát, aránytalan sinuscsomó-tachycardia: egy régi szívritmuszavar új megvilágításban (II.)
Inadekvát, aránytalan sinuscsomó-tachycardia: egy régi szívritmuszavar új megvilágításban (II.)
Összefoglaló.
Bevezetés: Az inadekvát, aránytalan sinuscsomó-tachycardia a
szív nomotop ingerképzési zavarával járó, nem ritka klinikai szin...
Ivabradine for Treatment of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Ivabradine for Treatment of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Aim To evaluate the effect of combination ivabradine-containing therapy for chronic heart failure (CHF) with preserved ejection fraction on quality of life (QoL) and the prima...
Ivabradine efficacy and safety in treatment of chronic stable angina
Ivabradine efficacy and safety in treatment of chronic stable angina
An elevated heart rate is an established marker of cardiovascular risk. Previous analyses have suggested that ivabradine, a heart-rate–reducing agent, may improve outcomes in patie...
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in Romanian Kidney Transplant Recipients: Effect on Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in a Single-Center Experience
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in Romanian Kidney Transplant Recipients: Effect on Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in a Single-Center Experience
Background: This study examines the impact of CYP3A4 and CYP 3A5 genotypes on tacrolimus (Tac) pharmacokinetics in Romanian kidney transplanted patients. Methods: We included 112 k...

