Anterior lamellar recession versus bilamellar tarsal rotation in upper lid cicatricial trichiasis

Abstract PURPOSE: In recent years, there has been a significant shift from this destructive procedure to a reconstructive procedure such as anterior lamellar recession (ALR) and bilamellar tarsal rotation (BLTR). The aim is to report the outcomes and success rates of ALR compared to BLTR in patients with upper lid cicatricial trichiasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study is a prospective, interventional, comparative study that was conducted at the Ophthalmology Department of Al-Azhar University Hospital, New Damietta, Egypt. Our study was conducted on 62 eyes of 45 consecutive patients suffering from upper lid cicatricial trichiasis that required surgical intervention (17 patients were bilateral and 28 were unilateral). Thirty-three of them were treated by ALR (group 1), and 29 of them by BLTR (group 2). All statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 26. RESULTS: As regards the immediate postoperative correction, we found that adequate correction was significantly higher in the ALR group at all follow-up periods (P < 0.05). However, the overcorrection and undercorrection were significantly higher in the BLTR group (P < 0.05). Compared to the ALR group, the BLTR group saw a greater undercorrection at 1, 3, and 6 months (9.3%% vs. 0%; P = 0.048, 18.6% vs. 1.8%%; P = 0.009, 18.6%% vs. 1.8%; P = 0.009, 18.6%% vs. 1.8%; P = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: ALR is better than BLTR in the treatment of upper lid cicatricial trichiasis.