Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of START triage categories to emergency department triage levels to determine need for urgent care and to predict hospitalization

View through CrossRef
Objective: To compare Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage levels and Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) triage colors for urgent care and hospitalization.Design: Cross sectional.Setting: Inner city emergency department (ED).Participants: Patients years transported by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) participating in the state triage tag exercise, October 9-15, 2011.Interventions: EMS assigned each patient a START triage tag. ED staff recorded tag number and color. Demographics, vital signs, 22 emergent interventions, and disposition were obtained via chart review. Institutional review board approval was obtained.Main outcome measures: Presence of more than two abnormal vital sign on arrival and need for more than one emergent intervention in ED were considered indicators of acuity and severity. START triage colors were recategorized as urgent (Red, Yellow) and less acute (Green, White), and ESI was recategorized as urgent (1, 2, 3) and less acute (4, 5). Results: Both ED and EMS staff were blinded to the study, and 95% confidence intervals were presented for statistical significance. Of 233 participants, START triage colors were Black = 0, Red = 12 percent, Yellow = 26 percent, Green = 53 percent, and White = 9 percent. ESI triage levels were level 1 = 1 percent, level 2 = 34 percent, level 3 = 51 percent, level 4 = 14 percent, and level 5 = 1 percent. ESI (1, 2, 3) identified 88 percent (75-95 percent) of 49 patients with abnormal vital signs; START (Red, Yellow) only identified 51 percent (35-64 percent). Twenty-one patients needed emergent intervention. ESI (1, 2, 3) identified 95 percent (76-99 percent) of these patients; START (Red, Yellow) identified 33 percent (17-55 percent). ESI (1, 2, 3) identified 98 percent of the 96(92-100 percent) admitted patients; only 48 percent (38-58 percent) were tagged START (Red, Yellow).Conclusion: ESI better identified patients with abnormal vital signs, those who needed emergent interventions, and those admitted than START.
Title: Comparison of START triage categories to emergency department triage levels to determine need for urgent care and to predict hospitalization
Description:
Objective: To compare Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage levels and Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) triage colors for urgent care and hospitalization.
Design: Cross sectional.
Setting: Inner city emergency department (ED).
Participants: Patients years transported by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) participating in the state triage tag exercise, October 9-15, 2011.
Interventions: EMS assigned each patient a START triage tag.
ED staff recorded tag number and color.
Demographics, vital signs, 22 emergent interventions, and disposition were obtained via chart review.
Institutional review board approval was obtained.
Main outcome measures: Presence of more than two abnormal vital sign on arrival and need for more than one emergent intervention in ED were considered indicators of acuity and severity.
START triage colors were recategorized as urgent (Red, Yellow) and less acute (Green, White), and ESI was recategorized as urgent (1, 2, 3) and less acute (4, 5).
Results: Both ED and EMS staff were blinded to the study, and 95% confidence intervals were presented for statistical significance.
Of 233 participants, START triage colors were Black = 0, Red = 12 percent, Yellow = 26 percent, Green = 53 percent, and White = 9 percent.
ESI triage levels were level 1 = 1 percent, level 2 = 34 percent, level 3 = 51 percent, level 4 = 14 percent, and level 5 = 1 percent.
ESI (1, 2, 3) identified 88 percent (75-95 percent) of 49 patients with abnormal vital signs; START (Red, Yellow) only identified 51 percent (35-64 percent).
Twenty-one patients needed emergent intervention.
ESI (1, 2, 3) identified 95 percent (76-99 percent) of these patients; START (Red, Yellow) identified 33 percent (17-55 percent).
ESI (1, 2, 3) identified 98 percent of the 96(92-100 percent) admitted patients; only 48 percent (38-58 percent) were tagged START (Red, Yellow).
Conclusion: ESI better identified patients with abnormal vital signs, those who needed emergent interventions, and those admitted than START.

Related Results

Improving emergency department triage quality improvement project
Improving emergency department triage quality improvement project
Background: Healthcare presents challenges that require nursing professionals to continually evaluate their practice. Overcrowding in the emergency department (ED) has become a wor...
Proceedings of the Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine 2026 Conference - Selected Abstracts
Proceedings of the Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine 2026 Conference - Selected Abstracts
Welcome to this issue of Panorama of Emergency Medicine (POEM) dedicated to the 10th Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine (Q-PEM) International Conference which was organised and ho...
Comparison of START and SALT triage methodologies to reference standard definitions and to a field mass casualty simulation
Comparison of START and SALT triage methodologies to reference standard definitions and to a field mass casualty simulation
Objectives: We compared Sort, Assess, Lifesaving Intervention, Treatment/Transport (SALT) and Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) triage methodologies to a published referenc...
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
Organisatie van geestelijke gezondheidszorg voor mensen met een ernstige en persisterende mentale aandoening
1 INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS 5 -- 2 GENERAL BACKGROUND: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 7 -- 2.1 CHRONIC AND COMPLEX MENTAL DISORDERS: DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE OF THE -- S...
“We can’t do without it”: Parent and call-handler experiences of video triage of children at a medical helpline
“We can’t do without it”: Parent and call-handler experiences of video triage of children at a medical helpline
BackgroundPediatric out-of-hours calls are common, as parents worry and seek reassurance and shared responsibility. Nevertheless, most children assessed in this context are not ser...
Referral to geriatric rehabilitation
Referral to geriatric rehabilitation
Summary Older hospital patients are vulnerable to adverse outcomes of hospital stay. In aging societies, post-acute care (PAC) programs were developed to support functional recov...

Back to Top