Javascript must be enabled to continue!
THEORY OF FORENSIC EXPERTOLOGY IN THE SYSTEM OF LAW
View through CrossRef
The article deals with the concept of a general theory of forensic expertology, the conditions for its creation, the place of forensic expert science in the system of legal sciences, the limits of its subject matter, the issues of interaction and the relationship of the science of forensic science and forensic expertology. The system and structure of the general theory of forensic expertology and its tasks are given.
Separate articles of the Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure, Administrative, Economic, Customs and Other Codes of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine “On Forensic Expertise” of 1994 and the constitutional confirmation (article 92, paragraph 14 of the Constitution of Ukraine) of the legislative provision of forensic expertise are the further legal basis development of legal, organizational and managerial directions of forensic expertology.
Forensic expertology does not only preserves the “birthmarks” of forensic science, but also, in turn, influences the dialectics of the development of the subject of forensic science and the content of its scientific fields (forensic techniques, forensic tactics and forensic methos). In particular, it requires clarifying the well-established view of the unity of forensic techniques for the investigator and expert. The first is made to collect “trace information”, the second is used for its in-depth study based on special knowledge in order to turn it into evidence-based information. Different goals are provided with different means of content. It is more accurate to raise the question of interaction, the “docking” of two, although closely related, but independent branches of scientific and technical means serving justice.
The tasks of the general theory of forensic expertise (expert studies) are similar to the tasks of forensic science. They can be divided into general and special.
General task is the creation of a scientific base for the purpose of the functioning and development of the industry of the use of special knowledge in examinations for the needs of legal proceedings, assistance in the fight against crime and other offenses, resolution of civil law disputes.
Special task is the study of the laws of formation and development of specific types of forensic expertises, the expansion of their capabilities; development and improvement of expert technologies, tools, methods and techniques; the formation of the scientific foundations of new types of forensic expertises in connection with the emergence of new objects (computer, art history, etc.); developing expert crime prevention measures; development of an automated workplace software (AWS) for an expert of various types of research, study and implementation of advanced expert experience; forecasting expert practice processes and research tasks.
Specific tasks are the up-to-date tasks that the practice puts before so the science of expert science to meet the needs that have arisen.
Key words: forensic expertology, forensic expertise, legal science, theory.
Kyiv Scientific Research Institute of Forensic Expertise
Title: THEORY OF FORENSIC EXPERTOLOGY IN THE SYSTEM OF LAW
Description:
The article deals with the concept of a general theory of forensic expertology, the conditions for its creation, the place of forensic expert science in the system of legal sciences, the limits of its subject matter, the issues of interaction and the relationship of the science of forensic science and forensic expertology.
The system and structure of the general theory of forensic expertology and its tasks are given.
Separate articles of the Criminal Procedure, Civil Procedure, Administrative, Economic, Customs and Other Codes of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine “On Forensic Expertise” of 1994 and the constitutional confirmation (article 92, paragraph 14 of the Constitution of Ukraine) of the legislative provision of forensic expertise are the further legal basis development of legal, organizational and managerial directions of forensic expertology.
Forensic expertology does not only preserves the “birthmarks” of forensic science, but also, in turn, influences the dialectics of the development of the subject of forensic science and the content of its scientific fields (forensic techniques, forensic tactics and forensic methos).
In particular, it requires clarifying the well-established view of the unity of forensic techniques for the investigator and expert.
The first is made to collect “trace information”, the second is used for its in-depth study based on special knowledge in order to turn it into evidence-based information.
Different goals are provided with different means of content.
It is more accurate to raise the question of interaction, the “docking” of two, although closely related, but independent branches of scientific and technical means serving justice.
The tasks of the general theory of forensic expertise (expert studies) are similar to the tasks of forensic science.
They can be divided into general and special.
General task is the creation of a scientific base for the purpose of the functioning and development of the industry of the use of special knowledge in examinations for the needs of legal proceedings, assistance in the fight against crime and other offenses, resolution of civil law disputes.
Special task is the study of the laws of formation and development of specific types of forensic expertises, the expansion of their capabilities; development and improvement of expert technologies, tools, methods and techniques; the formation of the scientific foundations of new types of forensic expertises in connection with the emergence of new objects (computer, art history, etc.
); developing expert crime prevention measures; development of an automated workplace software (AWS) for an expert of various types of research, study and implementation of advanced expert experience; forecasting expert practice processes and research tasks.
Specific tasks are the up-to-date tasks that the practice puts before so the science of expert science to meet the needs that have arisen.
Key words: forensic expertology, forensic expertise, legal science, theory.
Related Results
The System of Forensic Activity Digitalization Theory
The System of Forensic Activity Digitalization Theory
The article examines the system of private theory of forensic activity digitalization from the standpoint of forensic expertology. The subject, objects, tasks of the theory and its...
REGARDING RELATION BETWEEN CLASSIFICATION OF FORENSIC SCIENCE GENERAL THEORY TASKS AND PRACTICAL FORENSIC ACTIVITY (Review Article)
REGARDING RELATION BETWEEN CLASSIFICATION OF FORENSIC SCIENCE GENERAL THEORY TASKS AND PRACTICAL FORENSIC ACTIVITY (Review Article)
The article analyzes conceptual foundations, views and ideas as to understanding of the essence of the classification of forensic science general theory tasks. The main views of sc...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
CORRELATION AND STRUCTURE OF A FORENSIC TECHNIQUE AND FORENSIC SCIENCE
CORRELATION AND STRUCTURE OF A FORENSIC TECHNIQUE AND FORENSIC SCIENCE
A historical analysis of forensic techniques and forensic science emergence as scientific branches is outlined, their interconnection, differences are considered, the subject, obje...
The Significance of Professor Elena Rossinskaya’s Scientific School of Forensic Expertology for the Development of Forensic Science (in Celebration of the Scientist’s Milestone Birthday)
The Significance of Professor Elena Rossinskaya’s Scientific School of Forensic Expertology for the Development of Forensic Science (in Celebration of the Scientist’s Milestone Birthday)
The article is devoted to the contribution review of forensic expertology scientific school created at the Department of Forensic Expertise of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (...
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
Mezinárodní právo na prahu 21. století (dosažený stav, neúspěchy a perspektivy)
The study deal with selected problems of international law at the time of change of the 20th and 21st centuries. Such a milestone gives an opportunity to review the achieved state ...
ROLE OF M. M. BOKARIUS IN DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISHMENT OF CRIMINALISTICS AND FORENSIC SCIENCE IN UKRAINE
ROLE OF M. M. BOKARIUS IN DEVELOPMENT AND ESTABLISHMENT OF CRIMINALISTICS AND FORENSIC SCIENCE IN UKRAINE
This article purpose is to determine the role of Professor M. M. Bokarius in the development of forensic science and criminalistics in Ukraine, as well as to popularize forensic kn...
Forensic Pathology Fellowship Training Positions and Subsequent Forensic Pathology Work Effort of past Forensic Pathology Fellows
Forensic Pathology Fellowship Training Positions and Subsequent Forensic Pathology Work Effort of past Forensic Pathology Fellows
The purpose of this study is to document the number of accredited, funded, and filled forensic pathology fellowship positions in the United States and to document the subsequent wo...

