Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Distinct Neural Representations of Decision Uncertainty in Metacognition and Mentalizing

View through CrossRef
Abstract Metacognition and mentalizing are both associated with meta-level mental state representations. Specifically, metacognition refers to monitoring one’s own cognitive processes, while mentalizing refers to monitoring others’ cognitive processes. However, this self-other dichotomy is insufficient to delineate the two high-level mental processes. We here used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to systematically investigate the neural representations of different levels of decision uncertainty in monitoring different targets (the current self, the past self, and others) performing a perceptual decision-making task. Our results reveal diverse formats of intrinsic mental state representations of decision uncertainty in mentalizing, separate from the associations with external information. External information was commonly represented in the right inferior parietal lobe (IPL) across the mentalizing tasks. However, the meta-level mental states of decision uncertainty attributed to others were uniquely represented in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), rather than the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) that also equivalently represented the object-level mental states of decision inaccuracy attributed to others. Further, the object-level and meta-level mental states of decision uncertainty, when attributed to the past self, were represented in the precuneus and the lateral frontopolar cortex (lFPC), respectively. In contrast, the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) consistently represented both decision uncertainty in metacognition and estimate uncertainty during monitoring the different mentalizing processes, but not the inferred decision uncertainty in mentalizing. Hence, our findings identify neural signatures to clearly delineate metacognition and mentalizing and further imply distinct neural computations on the mental states of decision uncertainty during metacognition and mentalizing.
Title: Distinct Neural Representations of Decision Uncertainty in Metacognition and Mentalizing
Description:
Abstract Metacognition and mentalizing are both associated with meta-level mental state representations.
Specifically, metacognition refers to monitoring one’s own cognitive processes, while mentalizing refers to monitoring others’ cognitive processes.
However, this self-other dichotomy is insufficient to delineate the two high-level mental processes.
We here used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to systematically investigate the neural representations of different levels of decision uncertainty in monitoring different targets (the current self, the past self, and others) performing a perceptual decision-making task.
Our results reveal diverse formats of intrinsic mental state representations of decision uncertainty in mentalizing, separate from the associations with external information.
External information was commonly represented in the right inferior parietal lobe (IPL) across the mentalizing tasks.
However, the meta-level mental states of decision uncertainty attributed to others were uniquely represented in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), rather than the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) that also equivalently represented the object-level mental states of decision inaccuracy attributed to others.
Further, the object-level and meta-level mental states of decision uncertainty, when attributed to the past self, were represented in the precuneus and the lateral frontopolar cortex (lFPC), respectively.
In contrast, the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) consistently represented both decision uncertainty in metacognition and estimate uncertainty during monitoring the different mentalizing processes, but not the inferred decision uncertainty in mentalizing.
Hence, our findings identify neural signatures to clearly delineate metacognition and mentalizing and further imply distinct neural computations on the mental states of decision uncertainty during metacognition and mentalizing.

Related Results

Children with Cornelia de Lange and Fragile X Syndromes Spontaneously Represent Others' False Beliefs
Children with Cornelia de Lange and Fragile X Syndromes Spontaneously Represent Others' False Beliefs
It has been suggested that mentalizing abilities underlie the distinct profiles of autism characteristics observed in Cornelia de Lange (CdLS) and fragile X syndromes (FXS). Howeve...
IDENTIFICATION OF STUDENTS METACOGNITION LEVELS IN PROBLEM-SOLVING AND MATHEMATICAL LITERACY
IDENTIFICATION OF STUDENTS METACOGNITION LEVELS IN PROBLEM-SOLVING AND MATHEMATICAL LITERACY
Metacognition is knowledge and awareness about the process of cognition or learning about the mind and how it works. Solving mathematical problems requires the involvement of metac...
New Perspectives for 3D Visualization of Dynamic Reservoir Uncertainty
New Perspectives for 3D Visualization of Dynamic Reservoir Uncertainty
This reference is for an abstract only. A full paper was not submitted for this conference. Abstract 1 Int...
Distinct Origins of Two-order Hierarchical Cognitive Abilities in Human Adults
Distinct Origins of Two-order Hierarchical Cognitive Abilities in Human Adults
Abstract Human cognitive abilities are considerably diverse from basic perceptions to complex social behaviors. All human cognitive functions are principally catego...
Teachers’ Role in Chemistry Metacognition
Teachers’ Role in Chemistry Metacognition
Teachers’ role in chemistry metacognition describes what metacognition and chemistry metacognition are, their importance in chemistry education and how they can be taught or improv...
Reserves Uncertainty Calculation Accounting for Parameter Uncertainty
Reserves Uncertainty Calculation Accounting for Parameter Uncertainty
Abstract An important goal of geostatistical modeling is to assess output uncertainty after processing realizations through a transfer function, in particular, to...
The uncertainty–investment relationship: scrutinizing the role of firm size
The uncertainty–investment relationship: scrutinizing the role of firm size
PurposeThe objective of this paper is threefold. First, it aims to empirically study whether firm-specific/idiosyncratic uncertainty, macroeconomic/aggregate uncertainty and politi...
When do comprehenders mentalize for pragmatic inference?
When do comprehenders mentalize for pragmatic inference?
People often speak indirectly. For example, “It’s cold in here” might be intended not only as a comment on the temperature, but also as a request to turn on the heater. How are com...

Back to Top