Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

An Analysis of Veterans Cases for Military Self-inflicted Deaths and Suggestions for Improving Honorable Treatment

View through CrossRef
The 2012 「Veterans Act」 reform aimed to clarify the distinction between national meritorious persons and veterans' compensation beneficiaries. This was done to ensure those deserving public respect and honor are recognized as national meritorious persons, while those needing compensation are classified as veterans' compensation beneficiaries. This distinction strengthens the identity of veterans' affairs, making the current system of honors and compensation appropriate. The inconsistency between 「the Military Personnel Act」 and 「the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons」, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State, combined with the broad discretion of the Military Death Review Committee, has led to dissatisfaction and confusion among bereaved families and the public. Therefore, it is necessary to clearly define the binding authority of the Veterans Review Committee of the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs over the Military Death Review Committees' decisions to control this discretion. From the 1988 amendment of 「the Act on the Honorable Treatment of Persons of Distinguished Services to the State」 until the 2012 reform, deaths from self-inflicted acts were excluded from the scope of national meritorious persons, their bereaved families, and relatives. Despite the removal of this exclusion in 2012, the criteria for recognizing such deaths as national meritorious persons remain stringent. However, the enactment of 「the Act on the Support of Persons Eligible for Veterans' Compensation」 in 2011 has increased the likelihood of recognizing these individuals as veterans' compensation beneficiaries, which is a positive development. Given our conscription system, a shift in the state's perspective on military deaths, particularly self-inflicted ones, is needed. The state should strengthen its responsibility by reversing the burden of proof in these cases, expanding the recognition of national meritorious persons and veterans' compensation beneficiaries. Additionally, the contributory negligence ratio in state compensation lawsuits involving self-inflicted deaths should be reduced. Lastly, it is important to recognize the administrative nature of decisions by the Military Death Review Committees of each military headquarters and the Ministry of National Defense. Expanding rights relief through constitutional complaints under Article 68, Paragraph 1 of 「the Constitutional Court Act」 in cases of dismissal is also necessary.
Institute of Legal Studies, Kyung Hee University
Title: An Analysis of Veterans Cases for Military Self-inflicted Deaths and Suggestions for Improving Honorable Treatment
Description:
The 2012 「Veterans Act」 reform aimed to clarify the distinction between national meritorious persons and veterans' compensation beneficiaries.
This was done to ensure those deserving public respect and honor are recognized as national meritorious persons, while those needing compensation are classified as veterans' compensation beneficiaries.
This distinction strengthens the identity of veterans' affairs, making the current system of honors and compensation appropriate.
The inconsistency between 「the Military Personnel Act」 and 「the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons」, etc.
of Distinguished Services to the State, combined with the broad discretion of the Military Death Review Committee, has led to dissatisfaction and confusion among bereaved families and the public.
Therefore, it is necessary to clearly define the binding authority of the Veterans Review Committee of the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs over the Military Death Review Committees' decisions to control this discretion.
From the 1988 amendment of 「the Act on the Honorable Treatment of Persons of Distinguished Services to the State」 until the 2012 reform, deaths from self-inflicted acts were excluded from the scope of national meritorious persons, their bereaved families, and relatives.
Despite the removal of this exclusion in 2012, the criteria for recognizing such deaths as national meritorious persons remain stringent.
However, the enactment of 「the Act on the Support of Persons Eligible for Veterans' Compensation」 in 2011 has increased the likelihood of recognizing these individuals as veterans' compensation beneficiaries, which is a positive development.
Given our conscription system, a shift in the state's perspective on military deaths, particularly self-inflicted ones, is needed.
The state should strengthen its responsibility by reversing the burden of proof in these cases, expanding the recognition of national meritorious persons and veterans' compensation beneficiaries.
Additionally, the contributory negligence ratio in state compensation lawsuits involving self-inflicted deaths should be reduced.
Lastly, it is important to recognize the administrative nature of decisions by the Military Death Review Committees of each military headquarters and the Ministry of National Defense.
Expanding rights relief through constitutional complaints under Article 68, Paragraph 1 of 「the Constitutional Court Act」 in cases of dismissal is also necessary.

Related Results

All‐Cause and Suicide Mortality Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Veterans Who Utilize Care through the Veterans Health Administration
All‐Cause and Suicide Mortality Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Veterans Who Utilize Care through the Veterans Health Administration
AbstractResearch ObjectiveLesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals have higher risk of suicide ideation and attempts than their heterosexual counterparts, but suicide data, and...
Integrating corporate social responsibility with financial outcomes: stock performance of firms hiring US veterans during COVID-19
Integrating corporate social responsibility with financial outcomes: stock performance of firms hiring US veterans during COVID-19
PurposeWe propose an alternative rationale for why some firms employ veterans, driven not solely by benevolence but also by the prospect of enhanced outcomes. Financially, hiring v...
SOCIOHUMANITARIAN PROBLEMS OF VETERANS OF THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN WAR IN THE MASS MEDIA SPACE OF UKRAINE (2014–2022)
SOCIOHUMANITARIAN PROBLEMS OF VETERANS OF THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN WAR IN THE MASS MEDIA SPACE OF UKRAINE (2014–2022)
The article revealed the characteristics and assessments of the socio-humanitarian problems of the veterans of the Anti-Terrorist Operation and the Operation of the Allied Forces i...
Exploring how military culture shapes veterans’ perception of aortic aneurysm repair: A qualitative study
Exploring how military culture shapes veterans’ perception of aortic aneurysm repair: A qualitative study
Background Veterans represent a distinct cultural group whose perceptions of illness and treatment are influenced by military culture. The study explores how pr...
Life quality of injured defence forces veterans who play sitting volleyball
Life quality of injured defence forces veterans who play sitting volleyball
The purpose of the study was to analyse the life quality and changes in it throughout three different periods in Estonian injured war veterans’ life (before the injury, after the i...
Reintegration potential of veterans as a factor of successful reintegration of them into society
Reintegration potential of veterans as a factor of successful reintegration of them into society
The article examines the main components that determine the reintegration potential of veterans. The results of a practical study implemented in the form of a questionnaire of vete...
Socio-institutional reintegration characteristics of hybrid war veterans
Socio-institutional reintegration characteristics of hybrid war veterans
The article considers the main areas of social work with veterans of the hybrid war. An analysis of scientific works on the research problem has been carried out in order to determ...
Mother’s education and late-life disparities in memory and dementia risk among US military veterans and non-veterans
Mother’s education and late-life disparities in memory and dementia risk among US military veterans and non-veterans
Background Adverse childhood socioeconomic status (cSES) predicts higher late-life risk of memory loss and dementia. Veterans of U.S. wars are eligible for educat...

Back to Top