Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Practical guidance on the assessment of radiation risks for diagnostic radiological examinations

View through CrossRef
Abstract Patient doses cannot be limited; instead, radiological examinations should be justified and optimised to ensure the necessary diagnostic or therapeutic effect with the lowest patient dose achievable. Assessment of the radiation risks from patient exposure is important part of the justification process. Hence, medical staff within the framework of their professional activities should possess necessary information on the data on radiation risk from different types of radiological procedures. An approach has been developed that allows considering age and gender dependences of the risk coefficients of radiogenic cancer and the age and gender distribution of patients for various radiological examinations to assess the individual radiation risk for patient and collective risk for population from medical exposure. The approach is based on a new expanded use of the effective dose concept proposed in ICRP Publication 147 and demonstrated using the medical exposure in the Russian Federation as the example. For 30 radiological examinations that compose about 80% of the collective dose from medical exposure of the public in the Russian Federation radiation risk was assessed based on calculated age and gender specific risk coefficients per unit effective dose. For the rest of the examinations a simplified approach was used to assess the risk, which was based on using an age and gender specific risk coefficient determined for one of 4 anatomical regions (head, neck, chest and abdomen) or for uniform irradiation of the whole body. The proposed approach allows significantly improving the assessment of the radiation risk while continuing to use the effective dose as a dosimetric quantity within the framework of the state program in the Russian Federation. As a result the collective risk from medical examinations in the Russian Federation in 2022 was lower by the factor of 3 compared to the previous assessment based on the effective dose with the nominal risk coefficient.
Title: Practical guidance on the assessment of radiation risks for diagnostic radiological examinations
Description:
Abstract Patient doses cannot be limited; instead, radiological examinations should be justified and optimised to ensure the necessary diagnostic or therapeutic effect with the lowest patient dose achievable.
Assessment of the radiation risks from patient exposure is important part of the justification process.
Hence, medical staff within the framework of their professional activities should possess necessary information on the data on radiation risk from different types of radiological procedures.
An approach has been developed that allows considering age and gender dependences of the risk coefficients of radiogenic cancer and the age and gender distribution of patients for various radiological examinations to assess the individual radiation risk for patient and collective risk for population from medical exposure.
The approach is based on a new expanded use of the effective dose concept proposed in ICRP Publication 147 and demonstrated using the medical exposure in the Russian Federation as the example.
For 30 radiological examinations that compose about 80% of the collective dose from medical exposure of the public in the Russian Federation radiation risk was assessed based on calculated age and gender specific risk coefficients per unit effective dose.
For the rest of the examinations a simplified approach was used to assess the risk, which was based on using an age and gender specific risk coefficient determined for one of 4 anatomical regions (head, neck, chest and abdomen) or for uniform irradiation of the whole body.
The proposed approach allows significantly improving the assessment of the radiation risk while continuing to use the effective dose as a dosimetric quantity within the framework of the state program in the Russian Federation.
As a result the collective risk from medical examinations in the Russian Federation in 2022 was lower by the factor of 3 compared to the previous assessment based on the effective dose with the nominal risk coefficient.

Related Results

Suffering of Patients with Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (TOS); The First Qualitative study in TOS
Suffering of Patients with Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (TOS); The First Qualitative study in TOS
Abstract Background Diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) is hindered by symptom overlap with cervical radiculopathy, carpal tunnel syndrome, or psychosomatic dis...
The Effect of Clinical Knee Measurement in Children with Genu Varus
The Effect of Clinical Knee Measurement in Children with Genu Varus
Abstract Introduction Children with genu varus needs frequent assessment and follow up that may need several radiographies. This study investigates the effectiveness of the clinica...
Hidden Radiation Exposure: Daily Life vs Medical Imaging
Hidden Radiation Exposure: Daily Life vs Medical Imaging
Radiation is a natural and unavoidable part of human life, present in the environment as well as in medical imaging procedures. While many people fear radiation from diagnostic ima...
Radiation Injury
Radiation Injury
Since the development of x-rays in the late 19th century, radiation has increasingly been used for diagnostic imaging and various industrial purposes. The human health consequences...
PENGARUH PELATIHAN PROTEKSI RADIASI TERHADAP BUDAYA KESELAMATAN RADIASI
PENGARUH PELATIHAN PROTEKSI RADIASI TERHADAP BUDAYA KESELAMATAN RADIASI
Radiology examination in Indonesia is bound by radiation protection policy. Radiographers, as radiation workers, must ensure radiation safety during radiology examinations. A stron...
Decisions in the Diagnostic Process
Decisions in the Diagnostic Process
The medical diagnostic process is complex and involves multiple phases of gathering, integrating, and interpreting information. Physicians often perform these tasks in stressful en...

Back to Top