Retraction

Thermal Science 2022 Volume 26, Issue 2 Part A, Pages: 921-929 https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI201110210M by Vukman Bakic, Editor-in-Chief of the journal Thermal Science request that it is necessary to retract paper PERFORMANCE AND IMPACT OF CRYOGENIC PULSATING HEAT PIPE USING A DIFFERENT NUMBER OF TURNS AND HELIUM GAS by Arunkumar MUNIMATHANa*, Mohanavel VINAYAGAMb, Prabhu RAJALINGAMc, Ganesamoorthy RAJUd, and Ashraff Ali KAVERIPAKKAM SUBANe aDepartment of Agriculture Engineering, Sri Shakthi Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India bCentre for Materials Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India cDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan College of Engineering, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India dDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India eDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, C. Abdul Hakeem College of Engineering and Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India published in the journal THERMAL SCIENCE 2022 Volume 26, Issue 2 Part A, Pages: 921-929, since this paper is completely plagiarized the article Effect of Number of Turns and Configurations on the Heat Transfer Performance of Helium Cryogenic Pulsating Heat Pipe (DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.09.005) published in CRYOGENICS, Vol. 96, 2018, pp.159-165, by authors Monan Li, Laifeng Li, Dong Xu: Effect of number of turns and configurations on the heat transfer performance of helium cryogenic pulsating heat pipe Monan Li, Laifeng Li, Dong Xu Key Laboratory of Cryogenics, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Corresponding authors. E-mail addresses: laifengli@mail.ipc.ac.cn (L. Li), xudong@mail.ipc.ac.cn (D. Xu). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.09.005 Received 11 April 2018; Received in revised form 22 August 2018; Accepted 12 September 2018 Available online 14 September 2018 0011-2275/ ? 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Following presented data, paper https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI201110210M must be treated as a serious academic misconduct - plagiarism. <br><br><font color="red"><b> Link to the retracted article <u><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/TSCI201110210M">10.2298/TSCI201110210M</a></b></u>